July 26, 2023

EP260 - The Business of PPC

EP260 - The Business of PPC

#ppcchat Twitter discussion that runs on Tuesdays at 5pm GMT - Led by Julie Bacchini (@NeptuneMoon)

Q1 How long have you been working in PPC? And are you/have you been agency, in-house or consultant/freelancer?


Q2 Let’s start with contracts or agreements. Do you currently use contracts or agreements with your clients? If not, why not?


Q3 Is there anything in your contract that is there because you learned something the hard way? If so, what is it?


Q4 What is your biggest challenge on the business side of PPC?


Q5 Do you have a business of PPC questions vexing you right now? Maybe we can help!


Please help grow the podcast - and rate/review on Spotify, Amazon, Apple Podcast & more - linktr.ee/ppcchat_roundup



1
00:00:00,680 --> 00:00:03,880
Hello and welcome to this week's
episode of the PPC chat roundup.

2
00:00:03,920 --> 00:00:07,600
In today's episode, we have the
amazing Julie Bichini leading us

3
00:00:07,600 --> 00:00:11,400
again on a topic of the business
of PPC.

4
00:00:11,680 --> 00:00:15,280
So this is where we answer
questions around what's it like

5
00:00:15,280 --> 00:00:18,520
working in PPC, how long we've
been doing there, how do we do

6
00:00:18,520 --> 00:00:22,240
contracts and agreements, what
do we find challenging talking

7
00:00:22,240 --> 00:00:25,480
about with clients, dealing with
clients, you know any of our

8
00:00:25,480 --> 00:00:27,400
business questions and and so
forth.

9
00:00:27,400 --> 00:00:29,680
So we've got five questions that
we go through today.

10
00:00:30,010 --> 00:00:32,930
And yeah, it's an interesting
chat from people who have been

11
00:00:33,010 --> 00:00:35,970
in this industry for a long
time, including myself.

12
00:00:35,970 --> 00:00:39,610
I can't believe it's been as
long as I've been in it.

13
00:00:39,610 --> 00:00:42,570
So yeah, I would give it away.
You're going to have to listen

14
00:00:42,610 --> 00:00:46,170
after the the intro to to hear
how long we've been in this

15
00:00:46,170 --> 00:00:50,050
industry, Is there many, many
veterans in this industry who

16
00:00:50,050 --> 00:00:54,450
give their advice on how to keep
going on in this industry, how

17
00:00:54,450 --> 00:00:57,930
to have longevity in this
industry.

18
00:00:57,930 --> 00:01:00,740
So yeah, I hope you listen and
join Lun.

19
00:01:00,860 --> 00:01:12,340
All right.
Hello and a warm welcome to this

20
00:01:12,340 --> 00:01:15,820
week's episode of the PPC Chat
Roundup, a podcast where I round

21
00:01:15,820 --> 00:01:19,510
up the usually Twitter
discussion that happens on

22
00:01:19,510 --> 00:01:22,950
Tuesdays at 5:00 PM GMT.
I'm your host Anu and I'm

23
00:01:22,950 --> 00:01:25,630
recording from my studio here in
London, UK and I use this

24
00:01:25,630 --> 00:01:28,830
platform to share not just
expert but also my ideas and

25
00:01:28,830 --> 00:01:31,990
considered best practices about
paid media and the direction the

26
00:01:31,990 --> 00:01:34,870
digital industry is going in.
So if you wanna keep up to date

27
00:01:34,870 --> 00:01:37,630
with my tips and tricks in the
industry and get the latest on

28
00:01:37,630 --> 00:01:39,830
the podcast that has been called
your go to.

29
00:01:40,420 --> 00:01:43,460
If you don't make it to the PPC
chat, live discussions and even

30
00:01:43,460 --> 00:01:47,740
if you do then like follow,
share and retweet or reshare or

31
00:01:47,740 --> 00:01:51,500
repost on Twitter and threads
with my handle the marketing

32
00:01:51,580 --> 00:01:53,900
annu.
Or join us on our LinkedIn group

33
00:01:53,900 --> 00:01:57,940
which is the PPC chat roundup.
Or if you're on Instagram, you

34
00:01:57,940 --> 00:02:01,540
can check us out at PPC chat on
this call roundup to get quotes

35
00:02:01,740 --> 00:02:03,740
and snippets from our previous
episodes.

36
00:02:04,140 --> 00:02:07,660
So, yeah, we have Julie taken us
on a great topic of the business

37
00:02:07,660 --> 00:02:12,440
of PPC and you might have gotten
a few clues from my intro, from

38
00:02:12,440 --> 00:02:17,440
some stuff that I what I've just
said here right after the intro

39
00:02:17,440 --> 00:02:22,560
music as to the the the feelings
that we're having towards

40
00:02:22,560 --> 00:02:26,840
Twitter at the moment.
So you know I said usually the

41
00:02:26,840 --> 00:02:29,440
Twitter discussion, why that
specifically?

42
00:02:29,440 --> 00:02:31,320
Because today we had the
discussion on Slack.

43
00:02:31,640 --> 00:02:35,240
So yeah, we we tested that out.
It was amazing, You know, the

44
00:02:35,320 --> 00:02:38,570
all the questions were written
out and all the answers were put

45
00:02:38,570 --> 00:02:41,330
in threads of that question.
So I think that was a great

46
00:02:41,330 --> 00:02:44,250
method of doing it.
And yes, I'm on threads because

47
00:02:44,250 --> 00:02:47,890
Twitter is becoming a bit of a
bum site.

48
00:02:48,250 --> 00:02:50,090
I feel it's just getting all
crazy.

49
00:02:50,090 --> 00:02:54,690
There was a new branding.
It's not a cold X, not even sure

50
00:02:55,290 --> 00:02:57,770
my brain cannot even get my head
around that.

51
00:02:58,090 --> 00:03:02,090
So you'll probably be hearing
more about my podcast episode on

52
00:03:02,090 --> 00:03:05,050
threads on Twitter.
A little bit on Twitter, if they

53
00:03:05,700 --> 00:03:09,660
they still allow it for as much
as the for as long as the PPC

54
00:03:09,660 --> 00:03:14,340
community is still on there, on
LinkedIn as usual for my podcast

55
00:03:14,340 --> 00:03:18,100
Friday post and as well
elsewhere on Instagram as I

56
00:03:18,100 --> 00:03:21,180
mentioned on there as well.
We're also on Facebook, so check

57
00:03:21,180 --> 00:03:24,120
us out on there.
So yeah, enough of the rambling.

58
00:03:24,120 --> 00:03:28,280
Let's see how this Slack
conversation went before we

59
00:03:28,520 --> 00:03:31,240
Julie goes into the questions
she reads out saying that, yeah,

60
00:03:31,240 --> 00:03:34,800
this chat is intended for PPC
professionals of all levels, and

61
00:03:34,800 --> 00:03:37,040
if you have something you want
to share, please do.

62
00:03:37,240 --> 00:03:39,520
We are a friendly and supportive
community.

63
00:03:39,720 --> 00:03:42,200
Please don't be afraid to
participate.

64
00:03:42,200 --> 00:03:47,000
So even though we've got about
457 people in this Slack channel

65
00:03:47,000 --> 00:03:51,160
specifically, it's only like a
handful of of people that do

66
00:03:51,450 --> 00:03:54,330
join the chat.
And we we're welcoming everybody

67
00:03:54,330 --> 00:03:57,410
that just wants to lurk around
or people who just want to

68
00:03:57,410 --> 00:03:59,730
listen to the podcast.
You are very, very welcome.

69
00:03:59,730 --> 00:04:04,690
And thank you for listening to
another episode as we journey

70
00:04:04,970 --> 00:04:07,290
into this new world of Slack
chat.

71
00:04:07,610 --> 00:04:10,970
Slack chat, could that be a new
phrase instead of Twitter chat

72
00:04:10,970 --> 00:04:13,090
is a Slack chat.
Let's get into our questions.

73
00:04:13,090 --> 00:04:16,810
So question 1, Julie asks how
long have you been working in

74
00:04:16,810 --> 00:04:20,250
PPC and are you or have you been
agency in House of consultant

75
00:04:20,760 --> 00:04:23,880
freelancer?
Julia Vice herself says 15 years

76
00:04:24,160 --> 00:04:28,520
agency life is the PPC person.
So yeah, agency life as the PPC

77
00:04:28,520 --> 00:04:31,320
person for her.
I've also been close to 15 years

78
00:04:31,320 --> 00:04:33,160
now.
I've done all of the above.

79
00:04:33,160 --> 00:04:39,560
So I have been in house agency
tech company now freelancer.

80
00:04:40,180 --> 00:04:43,820
I've done it all I feel Julie
goes I've been working in PPC

81
00:04:43,820 --> 00:04:47,300
since literally the beginning
and I'm a consultant and always

82
00:04:47,300 --> 00:04:49,900
have been.
Melissa McKee goes, yeah I'm

83
00:04:49,900 --> 00:04:53,220
doing it with a 121 years since
2002.

84
00:04:53,220 --> 00:04:55,540
I started in inhouse and did
that for five years.

85
00:04:55,780 --> 00:04:58,220
Fraser Andrews goes been working
in PPC for eight years

86
00:04:58,220 --> 00:05:01,660
predominantly agency side.
I did have a brief stint in

87
00:05:01,660 --> 00:05:05,100
higher education marketing for
UK Uni, but discovered it

88
00:05:05,100 --> 00:05:08,370
definitely wasn't for me,
Michelle Yeager says.

89
00:05:08,370 --> 00:05:12,570
Technically eight years OMG,
first three at Google as an

90
00:05:12,570 --> 00:05:15,610
account manager and then past
five as a solar consultant.

91
00:05:15,610 --> 00:05:18,490
I attempted a few other things
on the side.

92
00:05:18,490 --> 00:05:21,970
Wine making grad school
interesting and this has been

93
00:05:21,970 --> 00:05:24,450
the bulk of my income for the
past five years.

94
00:05:24,890 --> 00:05:27,490
Gil Gilner goes, yeah, marketing
since 2008.

95
00:05:27,490 --> 00:05:30,570
PPC specifically.
Only since 2016 I was inhouse

96
00:05:30,570 --> 00:05:34,570
director of special projects a
KA marketing Jack of all trades.

97
00:05:34,970 --> 00:05:37,970
Travis Bare shell responds
saying, yeah, I've been in PPC

98
00:05:37,970 --> 00:05:41,810
for about 10 years, mostly
agency side and consulting for

99
00:05:41,810 --> 00:05:45,170
the past five years.
Started across all digital

100
00:05:45,170 --> 00:05:48,730
channels, social search,
display, video, audio and now

101
00:05:48,730 --> 00:05:51,730
specialized predominantly in
SEM&SCEO.

102
00:05:52,130 --> 00:05:55,930
Dave Gallegos goes there.
I'm in the 20 plus camp PBC

103
00:05:55,930 --> 00:06:00,290
affiliate to start later agency
and in house Dan Patterson goes

104
00:06:00,290 --> 00:06:04,670
I started an SEO then in 2010
moved in house and took over PPC

105
00:06:04,670 --> 00:06:08,230
display and affiliates as well.
And yeah Ashton Cargo's been in

106
00:06:08,230 --> 00:06:11,870
the agency and consulting life
for five years not always PPC.

107
00:06:12,510 --> 00:06:15,430
And yeah Julie then answers Dan
Patterson who mentioned his

108
00:06:15,430 --> 00:06:18,510
stint with starting with SEO.
Julie goes I did SEO back in the

109
00:06:18,510 --> 00:06:21,350
beginning to you know when you
could make a decent title tag

110
00:06:21,350 --> 00:06:25,910
and get on page one of Google.
Julie goes as well same.

111
00:06:26,150 --> 00:06:30,330
So Julia Vice even saying SEO
writer to PPC Dan Patterson's

112
00:06:30,330 --> 00:06:33,370
gag goes Back in the good old
days I set up a stupid little

113
00:06:33,370 --> 00:06:37,010
WordPress site and was beating
out major banks for sometimes

114
00:06:37,010 --> 00:06:39,330
nice one.
Fraze Andrews goes.

115
00:06:39,330 --> 00:06:43,210
Yeah I did six months of PPC and
SEO work in my first agency and

116
00:06:43,210 --> 00:06:46,210
I cannot stress enough how
beneficial even having the

117
00:06:46,210 --> 00:06:48,170
smallest level of SEO knowledge
has helped.

118
00:06:48,570 --> 00:06:51,090
I don't think I ever really
bought into the whole SEO versus

119
00:06:51,090 --> 00:06:53,930
PPC thing.
I am so glad to hear that and

120
00:06:53,930 --> 00:06:58,830
even I did a chat with Viaduct
Jen earlier on today about our

121
00:06:58,830 --> 00:07:01,790
SEO and PPC can work well
together and the benefits of

122
00:07:01,790 --> 00:07:04,830
both and Fraser Goes are we all
SEO converts.

123
00:07:04,990 --> 00:07:09,510
Melissa goes not me being in PPC
from the beginning and Gil

124
00:07:09,510 --> 00:07:12,110
Gilner says I did almost
exclusively SEO for the first

125
00:07:12,110 --> 00:07:14,870
few years as well.
I also did SEO in the first

126
00:07:14,870 --> 00:07:18,270
first few months of my career,
but it was more linked building

127
00:07:18,670 --> 00:07:21,150
and it was very boring and
salesy.

128
00:07:21,150 --> 00:07:25,110
So I got out of there quick and
glad that I landed in PPC.

129
00:07:25,110 --> 00:07:27,550
Fraser Andrews goes, I couldn't
call myself a convert.

130
00:07:27,550 --> 00:07:31,520
I literally fell into a CEO but
was always interested in PPC

131
00:07:31,520 --> 00:07:35,360
because of the data.
Yeah and Dave Semperon says I'm

132
00:07:35,360 --> 00:07:38,600
I I just joined the channel.
I've been doing PPC for 14 years

133
00:07:38,880 --> 00:07:41,280
River goes.
I've been in PPC for over 15

134
00:07:41,280 --> 00:07:43,280
years now and have been all of
the above.

135
00:07:43,320 --> 00:07:47,280
Agency inhouse consultancy
freelance big little like me

136
00:07:47,640 --> 00:07:50,520
Dave Gallegos goes random ad I
hate when people hate on

137
00:07:50,520 --> 00:07:53,640
domainers.
I feel like they are cure people

138
00:07:53,640 --> 00:07:58,920
too like Seo's and PPCRS.
That's interesting, the tertiary

139
00:07:58,920 --> 00:08:00,280
goes.
I've been in marketing since

140
00:08:00,280 --> 00:08:03,320
2019, so quite young.
I was a freelancer before, a

141
00:08:03,320 --> 00:08:07,360
full stock developer, automation
developer for funnel marketing.

142
00:08:07,360 --> 00:08:09,720
I did that for seven years
before I go into PPC.

143
00:08:10,320 --> 00:08:13,240
Now the Hopkins goes 15 years
and I've done it all in house.

144
00:08:13,240 --> 00:08:15,960
Software agency.
I'm a SAS girl at heart, but I

145
00:08:15,960 --> 00:08:18,720
value my other experiences as
well.

146
00:08:18,720 --> 00:08:22,280
Jillian Phillips as well.
I've been in PPC for five years

147
00:08:22,280 --> 00:08:24,880
doing Brown.
I've been in PPC since for 17

148
00:08:24,880 --> 00:08:28,970
years since I got started.
Been 17 years even since I got

149
00:08:28,970 --> 00:08:31,930
started the last seven years.
Running an agency.

150
00:08:32,010 --> 00:08:36,530
So it's a very good agency.
Take some risks.com, check them

151
00:08:36,530 --> 00:08:39,690
out.
Robert Brady, PPC since 2006.

152
00:08:39,690 --> 00:08:42,929
Agency and consulting mostly
with a small in house stint at

153
00:08:42,929 --> 00:08:45,450
the beginning.
Austin Dillman in house from

154
00:08:45,450 --> 00:08:48,690
2006 to 2019.
Starting my consulting business

155
00:08:48,690 --> 00:08:51,890
in March 2019 and never looked
back.

156
00:08:52,440 --> 00:08:55,440
And those are answers for
question one and look at all the

157
00:08:55,440 --> 00:08:58,840
experience shared then.
This is why this is such an

158
00:08:58,840 --> 00:09:03,080
amazing group to follow and to
to hear what they have to say on

159
00:09:03,080 --> 00:09:05,880
things.
So we go to question 2.

160
00:09:05,880 --> 00:09:08,680
Julie asks, let's start with
contracts or agreements.

161
00:09:09,040 --> 00:09:11,840
Do you currently use contracts
or agreements with your clients?

162
00:09:11,840 --> 00:09:14,840
If not, why not?
Julia, VICE, yes.

163
00:09:15,000 --> 00:09:17,200
Oh heck here.
And we have a whole legal team

164
00:09:17,200 --> 00:09:19,910
to help us with it.
Julie goes, yeah, absolutely,

165
00:09:19,910 --> 00:09:22,750
100% of the time, yes.
Gil Gilner goes, yes.

166
00:09:22,750 --> 00:09:25,950
But usually clients have counsel
that develop their contracts and

167
00:09:25,950 --> 00:09:29,550
we have to adapt.
Melissa 100% Yes, very different

168
00:09:29,550 --> 00:09:31,830
at a small agency versus the
whole code though.

169
00:09:32,630 --> 00:09:35,670
And Michelle Yeager goes, yes I
do, Mostly for legal reasons by.

170
00:09:35,990 --> 00:09:39,510
But practically so far it's been
the best way for me to try to

171
00:09:39,510 --> 00:09:42,790
clarify the scope from the
beginning as an attempt to avoid

172
00:09:42,790 --> 00:09:46,470
massive scope creep.
I think it has helped, but I'm

173
00:09:46,470 --> 00:09:50,350
still majorly struggling with
boundaries, scope creep, knowing

174
00:09:50,350 --> 00:09:52,790
when to say no.
As a consultant, I find myself

175
00:09:52,790 --> 00:09:56,790
in a lot of Gray areas, which I
think might be more of a me

176
00:09:57,110 --> 00:10:00,280
problem and Gil Gillner goes.
In my experience, the bigger

177
00:10:00,280 --> 00:10:03,520
clients have bigger requirements
is a hassle, but I guess it pays

178
00:10:03,520 --> 00:10:06,040
off in the end.
Most of our smaller clients just

179
00:10:06,040 --> 00:10:09,120
do a a boilerplate sort of
thing.

180
00:10:09,480 --> 00:10:12,640
However, a lot of our clients
are foreign, so the contracts

181
00:10:12,640 --> 00:10:16,200
are questionably enforceable
either way.

182
00:10:16,760 --> 00:10:19,440
I say yeah, currently no, but
even when I was freelance, I

183
00:10:19,440 --> 00:10:24,540
dealt with contracting agencies.
So agencies that dual let me

184
00:10:24,540 --> 00:10:27,620
know about agent digital
marketing agencies that are

185
00:10:27,620 --> 00:10:32,700
looking for people to hire on a
freelance basis.

186
00:10:32,740 --> 00:10:36,790
And so they dealt with the
contracts and yeah, I just had

187
00:10:36,790 --> 00:10:39,750
to invoice every month and it
was always done through the

188
00:10:39,750 --> 00:10:42,950
agency and I'll be paid at
Friday of every week.

189
00:10:43,150 --> 00:10:45,750
Well every Friday.
So he was ah, I missed that.

190
00:10:45,750 --> 00:10:49,670
But yeah, trying to find clients
was also a tough started

191
00:10:49,670 --> 00:10:52,110
becoming a bit tough.
So yeah, didn't want to do that

192
00:10:52,110 --> 00:10:55,150
and some clients will delay
payment which is annoying.

193
00:10:55,550 --> 00:10:57,670
But no that's when I wasn't
using the agency.

194
00:10:57,670 --> 00:11:00,710
So yeah different experiences
Travis.

195
00:11:00,710 --> 00:11:04,560
Responsing agreement with
periodic Sow's and change

196
00:11:04,560 --> 00:11:07,160
orders.
Most clients have legal that

197
00:11:07,280 --> 00:11:10,880
legal that modifies the MSA.
That's an MSA as needed and

198
00:11:10,880 --> 00:11:13,600
Sow's and CEO's are rarely
touched, only signed.

199
00:11:14,080 --> 00:11:15,880
Julie goes.
Agreements or contracts both

200
00:11:15,880 --> 00:11:19,960
cover your butt and also clearly
layout expectations and terms

201
00:11:19,960 --> 00:11:23,120
when done properly.
Julia Weisko's contracts and

202
00:11:23,160 --> 00:11:26,240
Sow's are so important.
Never word it vaguely, but clear

203
00:11:26,520 --> 00:11:29,040
about what is included.
Yes, I'm in a discussion over

204
00:11:29,040 --> 00:11:32,020
this right now.
Nitish goes, yes, we are using

205
00:11:32,020 --> 00:11:34,900
contracts with every client
shared some very helpful tips

206
00:11:34,900 --> 00:11:39,100
regarding contracts as in Julie.
Julie Bichini shared very

207
00:11:39,100 --> 00:11:42,620
helpful tips regarding contracts
over Foxwall PPC discussion last

208
00:11:42,620 --> 00:11:44,460
week.
Thanks for that.

209
00:11:44,900 --> 00:11:47,940
Julie goes, I have had to sue a
client, so trust me when I say

210
00:11:47,940 --> 00:11:50,820
read all contracts and be sure
what is in them.

211
00:11:50,900 --> 00:11:56,850
Oh my God, read your contracts,
read, read, read the contract.

212
00:11:56,850 --> 00:12:00,530
It's so annoying with clients
who are going, Oh yeah, you

213
00:12:00,530 --> 00:12:03,450
tricked us into a new term.
No we didn't.

214
00:12:03,450 --> 00:12:07,290
If you read your contract, we're
following exactly what the term

215
00:12:07,330 --> 00:12:10,770
period is and what the rules of
the term of a current contract

216
00:12:10,770 --> 00:12:13,530
is.
And then Julia Vice goes, yeah,

217
00:12:13,530 --> 00:12:20,150
we are essentially at 150% on
hours due to reasons, but 50% on

218
00:12:20,150 --> 00:12:23,270
revenue from the pitch.
And now they want more stuff

219
00:12:23,270 --> 00:12:25,750
that is technically in scope,
says Madams.

220
00:12:25,750 --> 00:12:28,670
And all clients everywhere.
You cannot have what's in the

221
00:12:28,670 --> 00:12:33,110
SOW's if you consistently ask
for more than we agreed to

222
00:12:33,510 --> 00:12:36,510
deliver.
Julie also says, I also let me

223
00:12:36,510 --> 00:12:40,550
say here that if a client is
ever giving you grief about

224
00:12:40,550 --> 00:12:43,270
signing a contract, take that as
a major red flag.

225
00:12:43,270 --> 00:12:45,670
Absolutely.
If they are worried about a

226
00:12:45,670 --> 00:12:48,110
particular aspect of the
language, discuss it.

227
00:12:48,590 --> 00:12:52,350
I always stress that contracts
protect both parties, as the

228
00:12:52,350 --> 00:12:56,550
scope of work, price and other
details are all clearly defined

229
00:12:56,550 --> 00:13:01,190
and agreed to by both parties.
Now, Hopkins responds, saying

230
00:13:01,470 --> 00:13:05,750
contracts are safeguards for
both the clients and us. 10,000

231
00:13:05,750 --> 00:13:09,210
percent, 100,000% even they are
there.

232
00:13:09,370 --> 00:13:12,650
I will say I shifted my
perspective from six months or

233
00:13:12,650 --> 00:13:16,810
an annual to month to month.
This is in large part due to how

234
00:13:16,810 --> 00:13:20,770
campaigns types have shifted.
Google Now responsing We are

235
00:13:20,770 --> 00:13:24,090
month to month for the vast
majority of our clients as well.

236
00:13:24,090 --> 00:13:29,610
Some are annual duly responsing.
I use a hybrid model Nava with a

237
00:13:29,610 --> 00:13:33,130
commitment of three months after
the discovery strategy initial

238
00:13:33,170 --> 00:13:37,380
implementation part is complete
and then month to month after

239
00:13:37,460 --> 00:13:40,060
that phrase.
Andrews response saying super

240
00:13:40,060 --> 00:13:43,540
interesting around SOW and good
and bad clients.

241
00:13:43,980 --> 00:13:47,860
Bit of a plug, but Kirk Williams
of course stop the scale

242
00:13:47,860 --> 00:13:51,220
outlines.
So Kirk's book Stop the Scale

243
00:13:51,460 --> 00:13:53,860
outlines really well.
Some practical approaches to

244
00:13:53,860 --> 00:13:56,820
stop scope of work getting out
of hand?

245
00:13:56,820 --> 00:13:59,520
Absolutely, Julia.
Vice responsing, we stick to

246
00:13:59,560 --> 00:14:03,920
annual with 30 day out clauses
on both sides.

247
00:14:04,280 --> 00:14:08,160
The difference comes down to
retainer plus percentage or

248
00:14:08,160 --> 00:14:10,080
hourly.
There are good and bad versions

249
00:14:10,080 --> 00:14:13,280
of each.
We use an initial three month

250
00:14:13,280 --> 00:14:17,240
contract and after that it's
transitioned to monthly and

251
00:14:17,240 --> 00:14:20,200
Navagos as well saying I think
the other factor is whether

252
00:14:20,200 --> 00:14:23,560
we're percentage of spend or
flat rate lead or management

253
00:14:23,560 --> 00:14:26,200
fee.
I find that clients who go lead

254
00:14:26,200 --> 00:14:30,320
based or performance based need
more timelines in place in the

255
00:14:30,320 --> 00:14:33,920
contract because they get
temperamental general

256
00:14:33,920 --> 00:14:37,240
management.
There tends to be more trust

257
00:14:37,640 --> 00:14:40,640
doing Brown responsing.
We have a proposal SOW's and

258
00:14:40,640 --> 00:14:44,580
contracts as one doc.
We use Proposify to get

259
00:14:44,580 --> 00:14:46,900
everything digital digitally
signed.

260
00:14:47,260 --> 00:14:51,340
Been using it since 2019 and it
works well for clients of all

261
00:14:51,340 --> 00:14:54,140
sizes.
Julian Phillips says they are my

262
00:14:54,140 --> 00:14:57,380
most lucrative contracts so far
have been verbal, but I have

263
00:14:57,380 --> 00:15:00,980
much to learn about this stuff.
His contracts have been verbal.

264
00:15:01,220 --> 00:15:02,740
Oh, interesting.
Curious to see what others have

265
00:15:02,740 --> 00:15:05,340
been doing.
Well, we've listed it all out

266
00:15:05,340 --> 00:15:08,820
there for you Julian, and then
Brown says I know some who don't

267
00:15:08,820 --> 00:15:10,700
use one.
Those few times clients

268
00:15:10,700 --> 00:15:12,620
questions what we did or didn't
do.

269
00:15:12,620 --> 00:15:17,020
And I just pointed to the
proposal sow a couple years ago.

270
00:15:17,060 --> 00:15:20,540
One client wanted to shove the
contract terms in our face even

271
00:15:20,540 --> 00:15:23,660
when they didn't read it.
Then two weeks claim they are

272
00:15:23,660 --> 00:15:27,140
unsure that if we did something
because unsure of the very

273
00:15:27,140 --> 00:15:31,060
contract they had access to.
You cannot make this stuff up.

274
00:15:31,060 --> 00:15:34,820
Better to get it in writing.
As Julie Bichini said, not

275
00:15:34,820 --> 00:15:37,060
wanting to sign one is a big red
flag.

276
00:15:37,140 --> 00:15:41,220
Have good agencies.
Peeps are not pieces.

277
00:15:41,220 --> 00:15:44,700
You can just change out and
everything will be fine.

278
00:15:45,420 --> 00:15:48,060
Eric, how can responsing I tend
to work with smaller, more

279
00:15:48,060 --> 00:15:52,500
personal businesses with major
contract legalese isn't what

280
00:15:52,580 --> 00:15:56,500
either party cares for.
Sure, it exposes me to some more

281
00:15:56,500 --> 00:16:00,140
risk, but from a legal
standpoint, agreement emails

282
00:16:00,140 --> 00:16:03,900
with terms are legally binding,
just not as airtight.

283
00:16:04,480 --> 00:16:07,360
Robert Brady says I always have
a contract or agreement in place

284
00:16:07,520 --> 00:16:11,240
signed by both parties helps to
clarify the payment terms and

285
00:16:11,240 --> 00:16:13,560
scope.
It's a rolling month to month so

286
00:16:13,560 --> 00:16:17,400
I'm not locking anything into a
long term deal.

287
00:16:17,800 --> 00:16:23,280
So an Austin Dillman goes, every
client gets an NDA, MSA and SOW

288
00:16:23,880 --> 00:16:27,000
MSA.
We need a new acronym fill for

289
00:16:27,000 --> 00:16:31,510
that one and we simply go on to
question three, saying is there

290
00:16:31,510 --> 00:16:35,310
anything in your contract that
is there because you learned

291
00:16:35,310 --> 00:16:38,030
something the hard way?
If so, what is it?

292
00:16:38,030 --> 00:16:41,950
So what have people learned the
hard way and decided to put in

293
00:16:42,110 --> 00:16:43,950
interesting fact here that I
learned.

294
00:16:43,950 --> 00:16:49,590
I think it was doing my Rd. test
or Rd. driving test or something

295
00:16:49,590 --> 00:16:50,990
like that.
The lessons I was taking.

296
00:16:51,190 --> 00:16:55,070
One of my instructors said that
some signs, like the signs of

297
00:16:55,070 --> 00:16:58,380
like, you know, slow down.
You're about to go to an area

298
00:16:58,380 --> 00:17:01,660
that you can't see around the
bend and there's a sign of like

299
00:17:02,020 --> 00:17:05,660
a boomerang shaped sign kind of
thing telling you to slow down.

300
00:17:06,099 --> 00:17:10,140
Those kind of signs came into
place after an accident

301
00:17:10,140 --> 00:17:13,099
happened, so on some roads.
So they don't just put it

302
00:17:13,180 --> 00:17:15,700
everywhere, they put it after an
accident happened.

303
00:17:15,900 --> 00:17:19,119
So it just reminds me of that
because obviously you're asking

304
00:17:19,119 --> 00:17:22,560
the question of what have you
put in place after an accident

305
00:17:22,560 --> 00:17:24,839
has happened.
So Melissa McKee kicks us off

306
00:17:24,839 --> 00:17:28,000
saying I learned to spell out
the exact meeting and reporting

307
00:17:28,000 --> 00:17:30,520
cadence.
Otherwise your smallest client,

308
00:17:30,560 --> 00:17:34,200
smallest clients will demand the
biggest chunk of your time

309
00:17:34,200 --> 00:17:36,480
always.
It's the smallest, the ones that

310
00:17:36,480 --> 00:17:40,040
that that pay the least that
will demand the most honesty

311
00:17:40,480 --> 00:17:42,600
never Hopkins goes account to
build fees.

312
00:17:42,600 --> 00:17:46,810
I used to build campaigns as
part of the core engagement, but

313
00:17:46,810 --> 00:17:50,930
I found that folks who pay for
the build are more invested and

314
00:17:50,930 --> 00:17:54,450
buy into the process more than
those who get it for free.

315
00:17:54,890 --> 00:17:57,650
Julie Vice responsing?
Yes, actually, but it's a pretty

316
00:17:57,650 --> 00:18:01,090
corporate example.
We need credit protection ends

317
00:18:01,370 --> 00:18:05,010
for clients because we buy all
media and then bill it plus

318
00:18:05,010 --> 00:18:07,210
fees.
If they are not creditworthy,

319
00:18:07,250 --> 00:18:09,770
all platforms have to bill them
directly.

320
00:18:10,600 --> 00:18:14,080
Delivers response in response to
Nava Hawkins saying yes, those

321
00:18:14,080 --> 00:18:17,800
build fees need to be identified
and built separately.

322
00:18:18,240 --> 00:18:21,440
Travis responds, saying the two
biggest things I've learned are

323
00:18:21,440 --> 00:18:25,400
one clause that indicates all
work product is the property of

324
00:18:25,400 --> 00:18:28,320
client campaigns, payment
profiles, data research.

325
00:18:28,320 --> 00:18:32,720
Yes, two clause that mandates
that work product may be used

326
00:18:32,960 --> 00:18:35,920
with approval in final form to
promote my business.

327
00:18:36,160 --> 00:18:37,560
So case studies that kind of
thing.

328
00:18:38,330 --> 00:18:41,450
The former satisfies clients
that they own the work, plain

329
00:18:41,450 --> 00:18:44,490
and simple.
They pay and XYZ output is

330
00:18:44,490 --> 00:18:46,570
theirs.
The latter allows for self

331
00:18:46,570 --> 00:18:50,890
promotion, earning future work
and creates A symbiosis that's

332
00:18:50,890 --> 00:18:54,730
healthy in my experience.
You'll go now respond saying no.

333
00:18:54,730 --> 00:18:57,730
In our experience we have found
that we are better served by pre

334
00:18:57,730 --> 00:19:01,450
qualifying clients than spending
too much time enforcing things.

335
00:19:01,730 --> 00:19:04,490
Of course things always slip
through the cracks, but we try

336
00:19:04,490 --> 00:19:07,610
to keep things as open and easy
as possible.

337
00:19:08,010 --> 00:19:12,530
Since we're month to month with
the vast majority of clients, we

338
00:19:12,530 --> 00:19:15,890
have never had issues.
Granted, most of our clients are

339
00:19:15,890 --> 00:19:21,090
smaller, think less than
$2,000,000 per year of of spend,

340
00:19:21,290 --> 00:19:24,050
so they are usually pretty
flexible with things.

341
00:19:24,290 --> 00:19:27,010
Almost everything is in writing
in some way or the other.

342
00:19:27,010 --> 00:19:30,010
However, phrase Andrew's
responsing normally things like

343
00:19:30,010 --> 00:19:32,730
3 month clause.
If things aren't working well

344
00:19:32,730 --> 00:19:35,890
from the offset, it allows both
parties to leave and typically

345
00:19:36,400 --> 00:19:39,960
is a good way to keep things
relatively amicable.

346
00:19:40,360 --> 00:19:43,240
Michelle responds in I include
call cadence, and also

347
00:19:43,240 --> 00:19:46,360
expectations around conversion,
tracking, troubleshooting, et

348
00:19:46,360 --> 00:19:48,920
cetera.
Julia Vice responds in I'm

349
00:19:48,920 --> 00:19:53,400
Jealous and That's here, and
she's jealous of Travis saying

350
00:19:53,400 --> 00:19:56,880
specific brand permission needed
for every blog post, awards

351
00:19:56,880 --> 00:19:59,840
submission, and conference.
So yeah, especially for the

352
00:20:00,000 --> 00:20:04,600
close to that Travis mentioned
in terms of being able to use

353
00:20:04,600 --> 00:20:08,760
the work that he's things that
he's worked on for you know,

354
00:20:08,760 --> 00:20:13,440
promotion purposes for examples,
response saying, yeah, pre

355
00:20:13,440 --> 00:20:16,920
qualification is something that
nowhere near enough agencies are

356
00:20:17,200 --> 00:20:21,000
doing but totally should never
goes pre qualify stress free

357
00:20:21,000 --> 00:20:24,080
equals pre qualify equals to
stress free contracts.

358
00:20:24,470 --> 00:20:26,950
Julie goes level of
communication that is included.

359
00:20:26,950 --> 00:20:30,470
We have all had a client who
wants to e-mail, talk, etcetera

360
00:20:30,710 --> 00:20:32,470
way too much for what they're
paying.

361
00:20:32,750 --> 00:20:36,790
My working hours and time zone
and exclusion section about what

362
00:20:36,790 --> 00:20:39,590
is not included.
Oh, she continues.

363
00:20:39,630 --> 00:20:42,710
And what is an actual emergency
and how different types are

364
00:20:42,710 --> 00:20:47,110
handled as such as one did my
work caused the emergency, two

365
00:20:47,110 --> 00:20:50,310
did the platform caused the
emergency, three did the client

366
00:20:50,310 --> 00:20:53,720
caused the emergency.
Melissa goes that's part of the

367
00:20:53,720 --> 00:20:55,600
problem with being on Slack with
clients.

368
00:20:55,600 --> 00:20:59,160
They think it gives them free
reign to just ping you all day

369
00:20:59,160 --> 00:21:02,240
and night.
And Travis responds to Julia

370
00:21:02,240 --> 00:21:05,160
Vice saying, yeah, the
conversation that I have is what

371
00:21:05,160 --> 00:21:08,720
pace do you want to operate at
If you require granular

372
00:21:08,720 --> 00:21:11,600
permissions will operate slower
than we could.

373
00:21:12,040 --> 00:21:14,640
If we can achieve a mutual
trust, we can work towards

374
00:21:14,640 --> 00:21:17,860
breakneck speed.
It's not perfect, but it served

375
00:21:17,860 --> 00:21:19,740
me well.
Clients like that.

376
00:21:19,740 --> 00:21:23,100
They have control over the
things that matter and the

377
00:21:23,100 --> 00:21:25,100
respect that I need things out
of.

378
00:21:25,100 --> 00:21:27,900
The engagement as well,
absolutely should be mutually

379
00:21:27,900 --> 00:21:31,900
beneficial, not just from a
money perspective, Julie

380
00:21:31,900 --> 00:21:34,460
responds saying yeah, in
response to Melissa McKee

381
00:21:34,460 --> 00:21:38,300
saying, I try very, very hard to
not be on clients slack.

382
00:21:38,300 --> 00:21:41,860
If they insist they pay extra
and I am not instantly available

383
00:21:41,860 --> 00:21:45,520
for them, specify how frequently
I will check their Slack on

384
00:21:45,520 --> 00:21:48,800
business days.
That part is important too.

385
00:21:49,360 --> 00:21:53,000
And yeah, Julie Vice goes that
Status notifications is IT.

386
00:21:53,440 --> 00:21:56,560
Phrase Andrews Great says 24
hours response time in the

387
00:21:56,560 --> 00:21:59,400
working week are a nice way to
ensure that clients don't

388
00:21:59,400 --> 00:22:03,200
bombard you with messages.
This response can even just be

389
00:22:03,200 --> 00:22:06,320
an acknowledgement of receiving
the message, but it helps to

390
00:22:06,320 --> 00:22:10,120
stop clients and employees
feeling the need to be on it at

391
00:22:10,120 --> 00:22:12,720
all times.
Julie Vice responds very into

392
00:22:12,720 --> 00:22:16,520
this confirming receipt note
with next steps and timelines in

393
00:22:16,520 --> 00:22:19,120
the body.
And Julie as well says make sure

394
00:22:19,120 --> 00:22:21,440
you put in there your billing
terms too.

395
00:22:21,440 --> 00:22:24,800
In terms of the contract, that
is our invoices due upon

396
00:22:24,800 --> 00:22:27,680
request, Are they due within 30
days and what happens if they

397
00:22:27,680 --> 00:22:30,200
are late?
Lots of things in contracts are

398
00:22:30,240 --> 00:22:34,080
there for worst case scenario
and just because it is in there

399
00:22:34,400 --> 00:22:36,480
does not mean you have to
enforce it.

400
00:22:36,680 --> 00:22:40,720
You can certainly tell a client
that you're waiving the fee that

401
00:22:40,760 --> 00:22:44,720
is in the contract for late
payment etc, but it is there if

402
00:22:44,720 --> 00:22:47,760
you need to enforce it.
But as it goes, yeah, same

403
00:22:47,760 --> 00:22:51,320
reconfirming receipt.
Not saying I'll drop everything

404
00:22:51,320 --> 00:22:54,000
and do this.
Now River goes, we have a list

405
00:22:54,000 --> 00:22:56,160
of our responsibilities and
their responsibilities.

406
00:22:56,160 --> 00:22:59,280
Glad we have that.
So it's clear that they need to

407
00:22:59,280 --> 00:23:03,000
pay their bills with engines,
give us assets, etc.

408
00:23:03,760 --> 00:23:07,120
I have a turnaround times
specified to Julie goes, Julia

409
00:23:07,120 --> 00:23:09,800
goes.
I love a work back schedule with

410
00:23:09,800 --> 00:23:11,480
our deliverables.
They're deliverables.

411
00:23:11,480 --> 00:23:15,360
Creative deliverables.
Google, Microsoft deliverables.

412
00:23:15,560 --> 00:23:18,400
Chefs.
Kiss van Brown goes, if I look

413
00:23:18,400 --> 00:23:22,440
back at 2019 versus now, way
more detail and sometimes

414
00:23:22,440 --> 00:23:26,200
repeating things a few times.
Comms has gotten a couple

415
00:23:26,200 --> 00:23:29,920
updates to make it more clear we
don't do weekly meetings that

416
00:23:29,920 --> 00:23:33,600
are often a waste of time for
clients of exercise.

417
00:23:34,000 --> 00:23:38,040
Gil Gilner responds saying
nearly 100% of our clients comes

418
00:23:38,080 --> 00:23:41,440
are via e-mail.
The good ones get my cell phone

419
00:23:41,440 --> 00:23:44,160
number.
Even the good ones I think

420
00:23:44,160 --> 00:23:46,040
shouldn't get your cell phone
number.

421
00:23:46,040 --> 00:23:48,720
But anyway, Michelle responds.
I've been dreaming about

422
00:23:48,720 --> 00:23:53,510
including some part about baking
in vacation time for me since I

423
00:23:53,510 --> 00:23:58,230
usually usually do retainer, but
not sure if this is standard at

424
00:23:58,310 --> 00:24:00,910
all.
Eric Hiken responds not from a

425
00:24:00,910 --> 00:24:06,310
PPC standpoint, but if I take on
any web dev job, I'm writing an

426
00:24:06,310 --> 00:24:08,070
expiry period into my
agreements.

427
00:24:08,070 --> 00:24:10,190
Moving forward.
I've agreed to read you a

428
00:24:10,190 --> 00:24:12,910
friend's business website for an
X flat fee.

429
00:24:12,910 --> 00:24:16,350
It's been probably three years
I've had the full payment, but

430
00:24:16,350 --> 00:24:18,870
he stopped providing assets to
complete the job.

431
00:24:19,310 --> 00:24:22,950
So it sits there as a liability
to me that I have yet to make

432
00:24:23,030 --> 00:24:26,790
good on.
Oh Lord, Julie goes, yeah, you

433
00:24:26,790 --> 00:24:30,270
can absolutely stipulate how
your work shifts when you are on

434
00:24:30,270 --> 00:24:32,470
vacation and what kind of notice
you give.

435
00:24:32,470 --> 00:24:36,870
Although be careful on that as
when you give too much notice, I

436
00:24:36,870 --> 00:24:39,510
swear some clients hear that
you're retiring and not going to

437
00:24:39,510 --> 00:24:42,910
the beach for a week.
So all of a sudden it's like,

438
00:24:43,230 --> 00:24:48,070
OK, let's find a new paid search
consultant, Michelle goes, LOL.

439
00:24:48,070 --> 00:24:50,550
I get worried that they are
going to freak out and be like

440
00:24:50,550 --> 00:24:53,390
checking on stuff every day and
assuming things are emergencies

441
00:24:53,390 --> 00:24:56,990
when they are not, but I think I
need to just do it at some

442
00:24:56,990 --> 00:24:59,750
point.
Austin Dillman goes, yeah, more

443
00:24:59,750 --> 00:25:02,790
thorough in scope and out of
scope sections and stricter

444
00:25:02,790 --> 00:25:06,510
payment terms.
Minimum 50% upfront before work

445
00:25:06,510 --> 00:25:08,790
starts and shorter payment
cycles.

446
00:25:09,070 --> 00:25:13,270
Net 15 and now we go on to
question four.

447
00:25:13,470 --> 00:25:17,150
What is your biggest challenge
on the business side of PPC?

448
00:25:17,510 --> 00:25:21,470
Gilgilna goes hiring.
Nitish goes our second at a very

449
00:25:21,470 --> 00:25:24,030
time intensive process that I do
not enjoy.

450
00:25:24,510 --> 00:25:26,390
Julian Phillips goes finding new
clients.

451
00:25:26,390 --> 00:25:30,710
My first client is an agency and
I manage a number of accounts

452
00:25:30,710 --> 00:25:33,190
through them.
However, the time has come where

453
00:25:33,190 --> 00:25:36,190
I need to attract new clients
and I feel out of practice.

454
00:25:36,670 --> 00:25:41,170
Julia Weiss goes expectations.
I am great at what I do, and I

455
00:25:41,170 --> 00:25:43,810
lead a great team.
We are not Wizards and can't

456
00:25:43,810 --> 00:25:45,890
force Google to do things it
won't do.

457
00:25:45,890 --> 00:25:50,410
Clients tend to be unrealistic
about my limitations how much of

458
00:25:50,410 --> 00:25:53,050
their budgets can afford, and
partners like Google can be

459
00:25:53,050 --> 00:25:56,610
unrealistic about how much
budgets my clients actually

460
00:25:56,610 --> 00:25:58,890
have.
Travis goes inevitably.

461
00:25:58,890 --> 00:26:02,240
PPC is like a spool of yarn that
unravels.

462
00:26:02,320 --> 00:26:06,000
It uncovers creative and query
level insights that make clients

463
00:26:06,000 --> 00:26:08,160
go.
I need to address that.

464
00:26:08,720 --> 00:26:12,520
The resulting scope creep and
getting clients to pay for it is

465
00:26:12,520 --> 00:26:16,280
the biggest challenge for me.
Me, I said people not paying

466
00:26:16,280 --> 00:26:18,400
their invoices or even not on
time.

467
00:26:18,400 --> 00:26:21,600
So when they're just very late
with it and pretending they have

468
00:26:21,600 --> 00:26:25,880
no idea, we will make of
responsing pricing what clients

469
00:26:25,880 --> 00:26:29,320
can realistically and actually
afford to pay versus all the

470
00:26:29,320 --> 00:26:33,240
various costs involved.
A Julie goes, we can help you

471
00:26:33,240 --> 00:26:36,520
get better at this.
That was to Gillian Phillips,

472
00:26:36,960 --> 00:26:38,720
Fraser goes managing
expectations.

473
00:26:38,720 --> 00:26:42,920
I think it's always one a huge
part of tackling that is cross

474
00:26:42,920 --> 00:26:46,560
training teams to understand
that is what is isn't

475
00:26:46,600 --> 00:26:49,240
acceptable.
Also pricing can often be an

476
00:26:49,240 --> 00:26:51,360
ongoing issue.
It takes a lot to say.

477
00:26:51,360 --> 00:26:53,200
We've built this pricing for a
reason.

478
00:26:53,640 --> 00:26:56,680
One can't go lower.
Of course, there's some room for

479
00:26:56,680 --> 00:27:01,720
movement, but clients asking for
50% off is a huge red flag.

480
00:27:01,720 --> 00:27:04,680
Yeah, right.
Nava goes, yeah, to Gil's points

481
00:27:04,720 --> 00:27:07,360
charge upfront and don't do work
till it's paid.

482
00:27:07,880 --> 00:27:11,280
And Nava goes.
I lost roughly 15 K 15,000.

483
00:27:11,280 --> 00:27:14,320
Yeah.
Dollars. 15 K dollars because of

484
00:27:14,320 --> 00:27:16,080
trust in the decency of human
beings.

485
00:27:16,080 --> 00:27:18,360
Never again.
And then Julia Weiss goes, yeah,

486
00:27:18,360 --> 00:27:22,440
an immediate discount, 100%.
No, a la Pubel.

487
00:27:22,900 --> 00:27:24,420
I imagine that's how to say
nothing.

488
00:27:24,420 --> 00:27:27,900
Not possible.
If I'm too much, go find less

489
00:27:27,900 --> 00:27:31,180
exactly careful, find less in
price and go find less in the

490
00:27:31,180 --> 00:27:32,940
level of work that you're going
to get.

491
00:27:33,380 --> 00:27:36,420
Gil Gilner goes, we charge
upfront for every client.

492
00:27:36,500 --> 00:27:41,380
Even our annual clients pay in
one lump annual sum upfront.

493
00:27:41,700 --> 00:27:44,780
Wow, I find that very bold.
I find that very scary to do.

494
00:27:45,580 --> 00:27:48,620
Julie goes, yeah, prior to that,
getting checks in a timely

495
00:27:48,620 --> 00:27:53,100
manner was challenging about 50%
of the time for ongoing clients.

496
00:27:53,540 --> 00:27:57,500
And Michelle goes, yeah, the
Pandora's box that PPC lovers to

497
00:27:57,500 --> 00:28:00,980
open, that loves to open.
It leads to an insane amount of

498
00:28:00,980 --> 00:28:03,980
business related things for
clients that go way beyond the

499
00:28:03,980 --> 00:28:08,540
normal scope of what PPC is.
So yeah, the ensuing scope creep

500
00:28:08,540 --> 00:28:12,240
for me is the issue.
Julia Vice goes businesses have

501
00:28:12,240 --> 00:28:14,240
to pay.
It doesn't have to be emotional

502
00:28:14,240 --> 00:28:16,200
or dramatic.
Here's the bill, here's the

503
00:28:16,200 --> 00:28:18,280
payment terms.
If you need relief, we'll have a

504
00:28:18,280 --> 00:28:20,840
discussion and move on from
there.

505
00:28:21,200 --> 00:28:24,160
Julie as well says always get
paid at least some of the money

506
00:28:24,160 --> 00:28:29,040
upfront and do not let them get
too far into you if they are

507
00:28:29,040 --> 00:28:32,280
slow players.
We can't repossess our work, so

508
00:28:32,280 --> 00:28:35,920
make sure you're staying in pace
with the clients payments and if

509
00:28:36,390 --> 00:28:39,950
they start out great and then
get slow, address it in the

510
00:28:39,950 --> 00:28:43,350
first month.
And yeah, Nitish as well says

511
00:28:43,350 --> 00:28:46,590
contract needs to be signed, an
invoice paid before any work

512
00:28:46,590 --> 00:28:49,030
gets started.
Also every step of onboarding

513
00:28:49,350 --> 00:28:52,030
needs to be done before we start
working.

514
00:28:52,510 --> 00:28:55,390
Navigo is helping clients
understand whether they are in

515
00:28:55,390 --> 00:29:00,020
fact the right fit for PPC.
I see a lot of folks swindled

516
00:29:00,020 --> 00:29:03,540
into smaller budgets that are
not going to do anything, not

517
00:29:03,540 --> 00:29:06,620
knocking great account
management of smaller accounts.

518
00:29:06,620 --> 00:29:09,260
I just find it's more common
than smaller budgets.

519
00:29:09,300 --> 00:29:13,220
Accounts struggle here the most.
I talk more people out of

520
00:29:13,220 --> 00:29:16,540
running Google ads nowadays than
I do empowering them to leverage

521
00:29:16,580 --> 00:29:20,620
it because of auction prices and
creative requirements.

522
00:29:21,220 --> 00:29:23,780
Dan Patterson goes Honest
question for those of you that

523
00:29:23,860 --> 00:29:28,060
are agencies of fly solo with
all the big strategies and other

524
00:29:28,060 --> 00:29:30,980
services available in Google, is
it harder to justify your

525
00:29:30,980 --> 00:29:34,420
services these days or do you
mainly focus on consulting,

526
00:29:34,500 --> 00:29:38,300
working for companies that don't
have an internal team etcetera,

527
00:29:38,580 --> 00:29:41,940
something I've been wondering
about for a while now.

528
00:29:43,220 --> 00:29:46,340
Travis goes, yeah, for initial
work I charged 50% upfront and

529
00:29:46,460 --> 00:29:50,380
and then I'm Moretize the rest
of the bill over the remaining

530
00:29:50,380 --> 00:29:53,500
duration of work together it
requires both parties leaning in

531
00:29:53,500 --> 00:29:56,340
and serves well for longer term
agreements.

532
00:29:56,890 --> 00:29:59,770
Julia Vice responds to Dan
Patterson and his work on terms

533
00:29:59,770 --> 00:30:03,530
of getting clients.
Yeah, especially the whole bit

534
00:30:03,530 --> 00:30:07,250
strategies development and
automation development in Google

535
00:30:07,250 --> 00:30:09,610
especially Julia Vice was not at
all.

536
00:30:09,610 --> 00:30:13,090
While individual bit strategies
are more automated they still

537
00:30:13,090 --> 00:30:15,810
need expert advice and teams to
run the program.

538
00:30:16,130 --> 00:30:18,050
My clients are experts at their
business.

539
00:30:18,090 --> 00:30:22,020
I'm expert at this.
Love that Julian response.

540
00:30:22,020 --> 00:30:26,100
I also spend more time talking
folks out of PPC2 than in two.

541
00:30:26,140 --> 00:30:28,620
I know it's the right thing to
do, but it registers as

542
00:30:28,620 --> 00:30:31,860
counterproductive to people who
saw themselves as a potential

543
00:30:31,860 --> 00:30:34,140
client.
Feels like a lose, lose.

544
00:30:34,140 --> 00:30:37,580
It's not a lose, lose, Gil
Gilner responds to Dan Patterson

545
00:30:37,580 --> 00:30:40,220
as well, saying landscape has
definitely changed in the past

546
00:30:40,220 --> 00:30:43,220
couple of years.
But most of our clients have in

547
00:30:43,220 --> 00:30:45,980
house marketing departments,
even if it's just two to three

548
00:30:45,980 --> 00:30:48,560
folks.
The answer is going up markets,

549
00:30:48,560 --> 00:30:52,040
small businesses, small business
clients are going to be able to

550
00:30:52,040 --> 00:30:54,480
do all this themselves soon very
well.

551
00:30:55,000 --> 00:30:58,960
And clients will only be hiring
as and when the budgets are big

552
00:30:58,960 --> 00:31:02,920
enough to justify some real life
eyeballs on the campaigns.

553
00:31:03,520 --> 00:31:06,000
Julie as well says, I think our
work has shifted.

554
00:31:06,000 --> 00:31:08,960
That is, we are not watching
bids like Hawks these days.

555
00:31:09,320 --> 00:31:12,960
But there's so much to do.
There's so much to do to have

556
00:31:12,960 --> 00:31:16,480
even the most automated of
campaigns running optimally.

557
00:31:16,760 --> 00:31:20,040
The machines are still kind of
dumb in a lot of areas that we

558
00:31:20,040 --> 00:31:23,040
are not.
The machines are a lot dumb in a

559
00:31:23,040 --> 00:31:26,720
lot of areas that we are not.
So yeah, our our role is not

560
00:31:26,720 --> 00:31:30,040
going away.
Nava Hopkins, as well as

561
00:31:30,040 --> 00:31:31,600
responsing.
If the only value you were

562
00:31:31,600 --> 00:31:34,160
providing was bid adjustment,
you were likely in trouble.

563
00:31:34,160 --> 00:31:37,200
Absolutely.
I I suspect that if you dig into

564
00:31:37,200 --> 00:31:41,010
how you enable folks to succeed,
you'll see that there was quite

565
00:31:41,050 --> 00:31:45,330
a bit more you're doing on the
technical or analytics side.

566
00:31:45,330 --> 00:31:49,090
Conversion, tracking, setup and
vetting, creative and message

567
00:31:49,090 --> 00:31:51,850
mapping, as well as overall
strategy by channel.

568
00:31:52,130 --> 00:31:55,650
I'd argue this is probably the
most useful time to be a PPC

569
00:31:55,650 --> 00:31:59,170
practitioner because most brands
can't keep up with all the

570
00:31:59,170 --> 00:32:03,320
changes being made.
For examples as well says yeah

571
00:32:03,320 --> 00:32:06,320
it's an interesting one.
I've seen our role change more

572
00:32:06,320 --> 00:32:10,160
into data interpreters and truly
understanding the platforms to

573
00:32:10,160 --> 00:32:13,840
turn the right cogs.
I still think many clients can

574
00:32:13,840 --> 00:32:17,840
just shove a load of keywords
into the platform and think it

575
00:32:17,840 --> 00:32:20,720
will make them rich.
The biggest thing for me is the

576
00:32:20,720 --> 00:32:23,440
role of Google reaching out to
clients directly.

577
00:32:24,320 --> 00:32:27,200
And if anybody's experienced
this experiencing this, I

578
00:32:27,200 --> 00:32:30,990
recommend checking out Boris's
and his latest threads about

579
00:32:30,990 --> 00:32:33,390
teleperformance.
Interesting.

580
00:32:33,910 --> 00:32:36,670
Reva Minkov says that yeah, I
was literally just having this

581
00:32:36,670 --> 00:32:40,510
semi existential conversation
with my team as to what's going

582
00:32:40,510 --> 00:32:44,310
to work with smaller budgets.
Now I don't always think it's

583
00:32:44,310 --> 00:32:47,950
more money that's the solution,
but the tactics for PPC are

584
00:32:47,950 --> 00:32:52,830
changing, especially on Google.
And yeah, Reva Minkov as well

585
00:32:52,830 --> 00:32:55,490
say I agreed that AI is less of
an issue.

586
00:32:55,490 --> 00:32:58,450
You still really, really need
someone who knows what they're

587
00:32:58,450 --> 00:33:01,930
doing to stare the ship.
Julie goes smaller budget

588
00:33:01,930 --> 00:33:05,530
accounts are in trouble.
Such ads are very much mature

589
00:33:05,530 --> 00:33:08,570
ecosystem now and that means
it's pricing out smaller

590
00:33:08,570 --> 00:33:11,970
advertisers, which is what Nava
was talking about, you know,

591
00:33:11,970 --> 00:33:15,290
talking about up thread with
helping clients determine if

592
00:33:15,290 --> 00:33:17,970
such ads are even for them
today.

593
00:33:18,250 --> 00:33:21,010
It's all about keeping our
integrity and if you're just

594
00:33:21,010 --> 00:33:24,340
going to take someone's money,
take someone's budget and not

595
00:33:24,340 --> 00:33:27,540
actually deliver with them, you
shouldn't be in this industry.

596
00:33:27,820 --> 00:33:30,540
That's my opinion.
Fred Andrews response saying

597
00:33:30,580 --> 00:33:33,300
also super passionate about
spend efficiency.

598
00:33:33,300 --> 00:33:37,460
It's our job to fight back and
in will Reynolds words stop

599
00:33:37,460 --> 00:33:39,820
Google taking more of our
clients money right.

600
00:33:40,340 --> 00:33:42,180
That's what SC is also trying to
do as well.

601
00:33:42,420 --> 00:33:44,420
So that's why I love them Riva
as well.

602
00:33:44,420 --> 00:33:47,500
See I agreed that PPC isn't the
right answer for everyone but

603
00:33:47,500 --> 00:33:51,180
what are you using as your other
options these days feel feel

604
00:33:51,180 --> 00:33:55,330
like the new Serps, SEO's
especially is less effective

605
00:33:55,330 --> 00:33:59,410
than it was as is a good chunk
of organic social.

606
00:34:00,250 --> 00:34:03,130
And Julie says as let's not
forget the influence we had can

607
00:34:03,130 --> 00:34:06,530
have in the post click part of
the equation 2 right.

608
00:34:06,770 --> 00:34:10,330
Historically I know many have
been pretty hands off but I

609
00:34:10,330 --> 00:34:15,050
think that is a smart place to
build skills right now.

610
00:34:15,690 --> 00:34:20,250
And then we go on to question
five, our last question for very

611
00:34:20,330 --> 00:34:23,900
detailed and the most
interactive chat.

612
00:34:23,900 --> 00:34:26,739
I don't think there have been
this many answers that I've been

613
00:34:26,739 --> 00:34:29,260
given by this many people on any
of our Twitter chats.

614
00:34:29,340 --> 00:34:32,219
Honestly, I don't know, maybe
just people don't sometimes find

615
00:34:32,219 --> 00:34:34,260
the questions which I found is
the case.

616
00:34:34,260 --> 00:34:38,460
But this has been a very
detailed chat and probably one

617
00:34:38,460 --> 00:34:40,500
of the most that I've found over
Twitter.

618
00:34:40,500 --> 00:34:43,739
So yeah, be prepared, they're
like over 30 replies to this.

619
00:34:43,739 --> 00:34:47,139
But it'll be a summary to this
question I'll be giving, So not

620
00:34:47,219 --> 00:34:51,739
every response I'll read out.
So our last question of this

621
00:34:51,739 --> 00:34:56,260
chat is, do you have a business
of PPC questions vexing you

622
00:34:56,260 --> 00:34:59,500
right now?
Maybe we can help now the whole

623
00:34:59,500 --> 00:35:01,180
concerns.
I want to help everyone and I

624
00:35:01,180 --> 00:35:04,220
know I can't and that makes me
sad, you know, right.

625
00:35:04,810 --> 00:35:06,890
Julia Vice goes yes with one
particular client.

626
00:35:06,890 --> 00:35:08,610
I don't think y'all can help
with that.

627
00:35:08,610 --> 00:35:12,290
But I appreciate, I appreciate
chairs and well wishes are big

628
00:35:12,290 --> 00:35:15,850
chairs to you Julia And then
Julie goes, yeah, I want to help

629
00:35:15,890 --> 00:35:18,530
all the small businesses to in
response to Nava Hopkins

630
00:35:18,570 --> 00:35:22,090
especially don't want them to
get scammed or waste money on

631
00:35:22,090 --> 00:35:26,810
things that won't bring sales.
And I think that is a big thing

632
00:35:26,810 --> 00:35:29,970
for why paid search market is
with integrity.

633
00:35:30,450 --> 00:35:34,460
We'll still be able to find a
job, will still have clients,

634
00:35:34,460 --> 00:35:36,980
you know, we need to stay in
this industry for the sake of

635
00:35:36,980 --> 00:35:40,620
the clients who might be getting
scammed and duped by the ones

636
00:35:40,620 --> 00:35:43,500
that have no integrity.
So yeah, if you're one of those,

637
00:35:43,620 --> 00:35:48,100
keep in it, keep fighting for
telling how business this Our

638
00:35:48,100 --> 00:35:51,340
paid search should be done well.
Our businesses should be doing

639
00:35:51,580 --> 00:35:55,580
paid search well and not just
doing any kind of paid search.

640
00:35:56,440 --> 00:35:59,240
Travis goes what vexes means the
poor association with price

641
00:35:59,240 --> 00:36:02,200
versus value among businesses.
No one disagrees with the price

642
00:36:02,200 --> 00:36:05,640
of an apple.
It's $1.50 per pound and we pay

643
00:36:05,640 --> 00:36:09,040
that, no questions asked.
When mechanic says it costs X

644
00:36:09,040 --> 00:36:11,920
for the part, Y for the labor,
we pay the invoice.

645
00:36:12,160 --> 00:36:14,880
When it comes to online
services, people are far less

646
00:36:14,880 --> 00:36:17,360
seasoned.
Clients come to the table

647
00:36:17,360 --> 00:36:20,400
feeling like it's a negotiation,
and I don't yet have a complete

648
00:36:20,400 --> 00:36:22,680
solution for that.
Yeah.

649
00:36:22,680 --> 00:36:25,400
And so Gil asks, how do you
charge a flat rate?

650
00:36:26,130 --> 00:36:29,130
Go Travis goes.
I fully scope out services at an

651
00:36:29,170 --> 00:36:33,290
hourly rate and 50% upfront, the
rest spread evenly over the

652
00:36:33,290 --> 00:36:37,090
duration of work.
I try to be as blatantly

653
00:36:37,090 --> 00:36:41,370
transparent as possible.
Go says Ali, is a very difficult

654
00:36:41,370 --> 00:36:45,050
model unless you're a holder and
then never goes.

655
00:36:45,090 --> 00:36:46,810
Actually, maybe you all can help
me.

656
00:36:46,810 --> 00:36:50,490
I have some consulting clients
who use another PPC vendor to

657
00:36:50,490 --> 00:36:53,850
manage their accounts and they
do so many bad things.

658
00:36:54,430 --> 00:36:57,790
Don't let my clients own their
GA four and add accounts.

659
00:36:57,790 --> 00:37:00,470
No negative.
Almost all broad search with

660
00:37:00,470 --> 00:37:03,550
display select.
How do I help my client?

661
00:37:03,550 --> 00:37:06,190
They know they could fire the
agency but they don't.

662
00:37:06,550 --> 00:37:11,030
Also the agency manages the SEOI
was gobsmacked at how much My

663
00:37:11,030 --> 00:37:15,550
client pays them 18% management
fee to do Essentially nothing.

664
00:37:16,310 --> 00:37:18,430
Michelle responds.
I was wondering how often people

665
00:37:18,430 --> 00:37:20,470
renegotiate contracts with
clients.

666
00:37:20,470 --> 00:37:24,200
I have several clients who have
grown pretty significantly under

667
00:37:24,200 --> 00:37:29,920
my watch, like 5 to 20% X ad
spend return, et cetera.

668
00:37:29,920 --> 00:37:33,240
And the work is a lot more, my
responsibilities are greater, et

669
00:37:33,240 --> 00:37:35,200
cetera.
And I want to start having

670
00:37:35,200 --> 00:37:38,880
contract renegotiations built
into my process.

671
00:37:39,040 --> 00:37:41,960
How do others approach this?
I know we've talked about this

672
00:37:41,960 --> 00:37:46,390
and I think a good answer I
heard was review things on a

673
00:37:46,390 --> 00:37:49,870
yearly basis and let the clients
know that you plan that at at

674
00:37:49,870 --> 00:37:52,510
certain points of the year you
review the contractor, you

675
00:37:52,510 --> 00:37:56,710
review the work and increases in
price can happen.

676
00:37:56,710 --> 00:37:59,750
I think we did a whole
discussion about how you charge

677
00:37:59,750 --> 00:38:03,870
when you charge, how you, you
know, ensure clients know that

678
00:38:04,230 --> 00:38:06,830
the more work that you do the
more you need to charge them.

679
00:38:06,830 --> 00:38:10,580
That really needs to be part of
the contract or sow's.

680
00:38:10,580 --> 00:38:13,700
No, not sow, but the contract as
well, the Ogilner responds

681
00:38:13,700 --> 00:38:17,180
saying that we went 100% flat
rate retainer model tiered based

682
00:38:17,180 --> 00:38:19,340
on ad spend.
It's much easier and lets us

683
00:38:19,340 --> 00:38:23,700
build totally upfront phrase
Andrews goes ideas around how to

684
00:38:23,700 --> 00:38:26,740
approach completely cold clients
are always welcome.

685
00:38:27,420 --> 00:38:29,620
Build relationships.
That's my my advice.

686
00:38:29,620 --> 00:38:31,780
Build relationship, Build
people.

687
00:38:31,780 --> 00:38:34,180
Who will be your biggest
cheerleaders who would really

688
00:38:34,180 --> 00:38:37,410
want to work not just with the
company, but with their the

689
00:38:37,410 --> 00:38:40,890
account managers, the account
contact, so that even when they

690
00:38:40,890 --> 00:38:45,450
move on and leave a brand,
they're still singing your

691
00:38:45,450 --> 00:38:48,770
praise in their new job.
Julie responds, saying there is

692
00:38:48,770 --> 00:38:51,970
an annoyingly persistent
perception that things on or

693
00:38:51,970 --> 00:38:53,850
related to the Internet should
be cheap.

694
00:38:53,850 --> 00:38:56,170
I think the best way I have
found to handle this is by

695
00:38:56,170 --> 00:38:59,470
saying I am not the least
expensive provider out there.

696
00:38:59,670 --> 00:39:02,390
If that is your number one
priority and probably not the

697
00:39:02,390 --> 00:39:05,630
consultant for you.
Because if they don't inherently

698
00:39:05,630 --> 00:39:09,550
see or understand the value in
what I bring to the table, they

699
00:39:09,550 --> 00:39:12,110
will never be satisfied And who
needs that in their life?

700
00:39:12,150 --> 00:39:14,870
Absolutely.
Now Hopkins responsing consider

701
00:39:14,870 --> 00:39:18,990
letting them know that you have
them on a League legacy plan and

702
00:39:18,990 --> 00:39:23,190
you want to keep working with
them but need to move them into

703
00:39:23,190 --> 00:39:24,830
a different plan.
And that's what that's in

704
00:39:24,830 --> 00:39:28,630
response to Michelle talking
about how work has increased.

705
00:39:28,630 --> 00:39:30,550
She has really improved the
accounts.

706
00:39:30,790 --> 00:39:33,190
How does she charge more then
continuing?

707
00:39:33,190 --> 00:39:35,750
Nava goes however, as a thank
you for their loyalty.

708
00:39:35,750 --> 00:39:38,790
You'll discount the new plan
even if it's an upsell on where

709
00:39:38,950 --> 00:39:42,190
they are now.
Julie responds saying a response

710
00:39:42,190 --> 00:39:45,350
to Nava saying I think all you
can do in that scenario in terms

711
00:39:45,390 --> 00:39:49,600
of she has this clients, that or
possible client.

712
00:39:49,600 --> 00:39:54,200
It sounds like they have a paid
search agency doing bad PPC for

713
00:39:54,200 --> 00:39:55,880
them.
Just let's just call it bad.

714
00:39:55,960 --> 00:39:59,280
All the best practices are being
ignored and they're doing little

715
00:39:59,280 --> 00:40:04,440
to nothing for 18% of management
fee, Julie continues.

716
00:40:04,440 --> 00:40:07,160
I think all you can do in that
scenario is tactfully point out

717
00:40:07,200 --> 00:40:09,480
the issues whenever they are
relevant to what you're

718
00:40:09,480 --> 00:40:12,800
discussing with them.
You can lead a host to water,

719
00:40:12,800 --> 00:40:15,000
dot dot dot or you can't force
them to drink.

720
00:40:15,910 --> 00:40:18,630
Julia Vice response to Michelle
saying that I'd like to review

721
00:40:18,630 --> 00:40:20,550
regularly.
Doesn't need to be each year

722
00:40:20,550 --> 00:40:23,710
just a good cadence and share
new platforms, complexity,

723
00:40:23,710 --> 00:40:27,070
changes, hours needed to do new
talks, tasks.

724
00:40:27,110 --> 00:40:29,750
It can be very positive.
It can be a very positive

725
00:40:29,950 --> 00:40:32,830
conversation and if you show
them they might be the ones

726
00:40:32,830 --> 00:40:36,510
going oh wow, you've not
increased our spend.

727
00:40:36,910 --> 00:40:39,430
And I actually think by the fact
that you've not done it

728
00:40:39,430 --> 00:40:43,340
immediately should be a way to
encourage them to, you know,

729
00:40:43,340 --> 00:40:46,660
sign on that new contract, just
show them for like, hey, for X

730
00:40:46,660 --> 00:40:48,940
amount of months.
I've actually done be doing a

731
00:40:48,940 --> 00:40:52,780
lot more than when I started
writing when when we when we

732
00:40:52,860 --> 00:40:56,300
first signed this contract.
Based on that we're going to

733
00:40:56,300 --> 00:40:58,060
increase it.
And because I'm already giving

734
00:40:58,060 --> 00:41:01,740
you a discount, sign this new
contract quickly and I think

735
00:41:01,740 --> 00:41:04,220
people will understand that
people know that you need to get

736
00:41:04,220 --> 00:41:06,380
paid for the job you do, don't
they?

737
00:41:07,100 --> 00:41:08,210
They do, right?
Right.

738
00:41:08,650 --> 00:41:11,490
Anyway, Julia, Vice responds.
What is your role in this?

739
00:41:11,490 --> 00:41:14,090
Do you do they see you as a PPC
expert?

740
00:41:14,530 --> 00:41:15,770
Never.
Hawkins goes, yeah.

741
00:41:15,970 --> 00:41:19,450
Kirk put this in a great way.
Our E hourly rate, and that's

742
00:41:19,450 --> 00:41:22,450
the person who does hourly In
response to the person who does

743
00:41:22,490 --> 00:41:26,130
hourly, you're not paying for
how much time it takes.

744
00:41:26,450 --> 00:41:28,730
Me.
You're paying for how well I can

745
00:41:28,730 --> 00:41:30,250
get it done as quickly as
possible.

746
00:41:30,730 --> 00:41:33,450
If I get it done quicker, I
should get to get paid more, not

747
00:41:33,450 --> 00:41:36,050
less time, not less.
So that's why hourly is very

748
00:41:36,050 --> 00:41:38,810
dangerous.
Travis goes, yeah, perhaps you

749
00:41:38,810 --> 00:41:41,570
expose them to how much freedom
you offer.

750
00:41:42,490 --> 00:41:46,210
With me, you own 100% of what
you should GA four is yours as

751
00:41:46,210 --> 00:41:50,210
your work product your own.
Here's a third party source or

752
00:41:50,210 --> 00:41:53,530
article that validates what I'm
saying so you can hear it

753
00:41:53,530 --> 00:41:56,450
elsewhere.
I want to extend that freedom to

754
00:41:56,610 --> 00:41:59,650
the business.
So yeah, in terms of nervous

755
00:41:59,690 --> 00:42:02,520
issue with her very problematic
client?

756
00:42:02,960 --> 00:42:05,480
Never response saying yes.
They hired me specifically to

757
00:42:05,480 --> 00:42:07,280
help them challenge their
vendors.

758
00:42:08,000 --> 00:42:10,640
Gogonas responsing my single
most important tip?

759
00:42:10,640 --> 00:42:12,840
Charge more.
The more you charge, the less

760
00:42:12,840 --> 00:42:16,840
fuss anyone has about the price.
PPC experts are rarer than

761
00:42:16,840 --> 00:42:19,240
you'll think, right?
Right.

762
00:42:19,280 --> 00:42:20,680
I should get back into
freelancing.

763
00:42:21,000 --> 00:42:23,080
Don't tell anyone now the
Hopkins goes.

764
00:42:23,080 --> 00:42:26,520
To be clear, I don't want to
take the business away from the

765
00:42:26,520 --> 00:42:29,440
vendor.
If anything, I want them to pay

766
00:42:29,640 --> 00:42:32,480
their team more and grow their
current staff.

767
00:42:33,000 --> 00:42:36,160
Julie Vice goes, aha, then roll
up your sleeves, build out a

768
00:42:36,160 --> 00:42:39,680
strategy with specifics on what
could be done differently, and

769
00:42:39,680 --> 00:42:43,400
show what the spend could
potentially get on the different

770
00:42:43,400 --> 00:42:46,480
management.
Then let them decide.

771
00:42:47,200 --> 00:42:51,080
And yeah, Julie goes built it,
built it, build it into having a

772
00:42:51,080 --> 00:42:52,720
yearly conversation with ongoing
clients.

773
00:42:52,720 --> 00:42:55,560
And that's a response to
Michelle about the scope of what

774
00:42:55,560 --> 00:42:58,200
you're doing for them.
You can even position it along

775
00:42:58,200 --> 00:43:01,480
the lines of let's make sure we
have this set up in the most

776
00:43:01,480 --> 00:43:05,320
efficient way possible.
And then Julia Vice goes, yeah,

777
00:43:05,720 --> 00:43:07,920
something's not connecting for
me.

778
00:43:07,920 --> 00:43:11,440
In response to Nava, the work is
below par in terms of quality.

779
00:43:11,440 --> 00:43:14,360
So they want more dollars in
order to do better.

780
00:43:14,770 --> 00:43:17,450
I'd get that vendor to make
serious commitments in that

781
00:43:17,610 --> 00:43:21,330
issue, in that situation.
And yeah, and response.

782
00:43:21,330 --> 00:43:25,570
So about Michelle's issue in
regards into making more money

783
00:43:25,570 --> 00:43:29,490
with more work, we sometimes do
climate meetings to ensure we're

784
00:43:29,490 --> 00:43:34,570
on track, communicating well and
to create room to change or grow

785
00:43:34,650 --> 00:43:38,250
the relationship where needed.
And yeah, Michelle goes, I love

786
00:43:38,250 --> 00:43:41,530
this idea because I also want
better feedback from my kind on

787
00:43:41,530 --> 00:43:46,020
how the partnership is going and
when Brown responds here in

788
00:43:46,020 --> 00:43:49,900
terms of what Travis was saying
about like about hourly rates,

789
00:43:49,900 --> 00:43:52,020
interesting take on hours.
I like your thinking.

790
00:43:52,020 --> 00:43:55,660
We took on one hourly brand last
year as they really wanted to

791
00:43:55,660 --> 00:43:58,660
work with us.
I just had to charge a high rate

792
00:43:58,660 --> 00:44:02,700
to make it worthwhile for the
work, which was 30% or higher

793
00:44:02,700 --> 00:44:05,620
than the two closest competitors
pitching.

794
00:44:05,860 --> 00:44:10,460
I still don't love hours, but
you got to charge for it, as you

795
00:44:10,460 --> 00:44:12,750
said.
And then Julie goes, yeah, the

796
00:44:12,750 --> 00:44:16,950
bottom line on in how you price
and position things in your

797
00:44:16,950 --> 00:44:20,230
agreements really comes down to
how well it works for you and

798
00:44:20,230 --> 00:44:23,750
your situation too.
As with everything PPC, there

799
00:44:23,750 --> 00:44:26,110
really is not just one way to do
anything.

800
00:44:26,470 --> 00:44:29,510
And when Brown also says if you
are making money and are

801
00:44:29,510 --> 00:44:34,510
profiting with how this year is
going, you are doing a good job,

802
00:44:34,630 --> 00:44:38,750
I say so Lately, if you're if
you're going by your principles,

803
00:44:38,750 --> 00:44:40,750
you're doing things with
integrity, you're making the

804
00:44:40,750 --> 00:44:44,470
money, you're making sure you're
increasing your rate according

805
00:44:44,470 --> 00:44:48,190
to the work that you're doing.
You're doing well.

806
00:44:48,190 --> 00:44:50,950
So guys, stop being stressful
with each other, with

807
00:44:50,950 --> 00:44:53,990
yourselves, even if you're not.
You're getting it's slow on

808
00:44:53,990 --> 00:44:58,350
clients and getting your clients
be be easier to yourself, be

809
00:44:58,350 --> 00:44:59,950
kind to yourself.
That's something I need to

810
00:44:59,950 --> 00:45:02,310
remind myself.
And on that note, we come to the

811
00:45:02,310 --> 00:45:05,980
end of this long chat.
That was definitely a summary.

812
00:45:05,980 --> 00:45:09,780
I didn't read all the responses
and look at how much we got

813
00:45:09,780 --> 00:45:12,220
through, so let's quickly wrap
up.

814
00:45:12,220 --> 00:45:13,900
I hope you've taken some great
takeaways.

815
00:45:13,900 --> 00:45:18,340
I imagine there's going to be a
voice conversation about this

816
00:45:18,340 --> 00:45:21,260
topic on Thursday, 5:00 PM G and
5:00 PM BST.

817
00:45:21,260 --> 00:45:24,540
So we're in British summertime,
but at 12:00 PM Eastern Time on

818
00:45:24,540 --> 00:45:28,860
Discord on our Discord channel.
So look out for the PPC chat

819
00:45:29,140 --> 00:45:32,620
group on Discord to join the
voice chat.

820
00:45:33,170 --> 00:45:36,130
Before any feedback about the
podcast or even some correction

821
00:45:36,130 --> 00:45:38,730
and anything I've said, get in
touch with me on Twitter, on

822
00:45:38,730 --> 00:45:43,170
threads, on my handle at the
Marketing Annual, or just follow

823
00:45:43,170 --> 00:45:45,130
me on LinkedIn and let me know
what you think.

824
00:45:45,610 --> 00:45:48,170
It'd be great for longstanding
and brand new listeners to give

825
00:45:48,170 --> 00:45:50,690
the podcast a review.
It really helps with the growth

826
00:45:50,970 --> 00:45:54,810
strategy of the podcast, and you
can do that on Spotify and Apple

827
00:45:55,010 --> 00:45:59,130
wherever.
Just go to linktree.com/P PC

828
00:45:59,130 --> 00:46:02,950
chat under score roundup to get
get to do that.

829
00:46:02,950 --> 00:46:06,230
It'll take seconds.
And finally, before I go, by the

830
00:46:06,230 --> 00:46:08,990
time you'll be listening to
this, PPC Live UK will be

831
00:46:08,990 --> 00:46:14,070
happening tomorrow on Thursday,
the 27th of July.

832
00:46:14,070 --> 00:46:15,590
Are we in July?
Yes, we're in July.

833
00:46:16,070 --> 00:46:20,230
You believe it, 27th of July.
We've got 3 speakers, we've got

834
00:46:20,230 --> 00:46:23,430
red velvet cake, we've got
drinks that I've already ordered

835
00:46:23,750 --> 00:46:27,390
yesterday and food that's going
to be ordered on the day so that

836
00:46:27,390 --> 00:46:30,650
they're fresh and hot for the
audience members.

837
00:46:30,650 --> 00:46:32,690
There's so many more tickets to
be sold.

838
00:46:32,690 --> 00:46:36,250
Go to PPC live U k.com.
There's a button right to the

839
00:46:36,250 --> 00:46:39,570
top saying buy tickets.
So go and buy your tickets is

840
00:46:39,570 --> 00:46:43,050
going to be a fun one year
anniversary celebration and I'm

841
00:46:43,050 --> 00:46:47,610
so proud, must say so proud.
Finally remember for your

842
00:46:47,610 --> 00:46:49,850
campaigns and businesses to
glide smoothly.

843
00:46:49,850 --> 00:46:52,370
There's a lot of hard work
needed beneath the surface, so

844
00:46:52,650 --> 00:46:54,930
keep your Swans kicking by and
speak to you next week.