July 26, 2023
EP260 - The Business of PPC
#ppcchat Twitter discussion that runs on Tuesdays at 5pm GMT - Led by Julie Bacchini (@NeptuneMoon)
Q1 How long have you been working in PPC? And are you/have you been agency, in-house or consultant/freelancer?
Q2 Let’s start with contracts or agreements. Do you currently use contracts or agreements with your clients? If not, why not?
Q3 Is there anything in your contract that is there because you learned something the hard way? If so, what is it?
Q4 What is your biggest challenge on the business side of PPC?
Q5 Do you have a business of PPC questions vexing you right now? Maybe we can help!
Please help grow the podcast - and rate/review on Spotify, Amazon, Apple Podcast & more - linktr.ee/ppcchat_roundup
1
00:00:00,680 --> 00:00:03,880
Hello and welcome to this week's
episode of the PPC chat roundup.
2
00:00:03,920 --> 00:00:07,600
In today's episode, we have the
amazing Julie Bichini leading us
3
00:00:07,600 --> 00:00:11,400
again on a topic of the business
of PPC.
4
00:00:11,680 --> 00:00:15,280
So this is where we answer
questions around what's it like
5
00:00:15,280 --> 00:00:18,520
working in PPC, how long we've
been doing there, how do we do
6
00:00:18,520 --> 00:00:22,240
contracts and agreements, what
do we find challenging talking
7
00:00:22,240 --> 00:00:25,480
about with clients, dealing with
clients, you know any of our
8
00:00:25,480 --> 00:00:27,400
business questions and and so
forth.
9
00:00:27,400 --> 00:00:29,680
So we've got five questions that
we go through today.
10
00:00:30,010 --> 00:00:32,930
And yeah, it's an interesting
chat from people who have been
11
00:00:33,010 --> 00:00:35,970
in this industry for a long
time, including myself.
12
00:00:35,970 --> 00:00:39,610
I can't believe it's been as
long as I've been in it.
13
00:00:39,610 --> 00:00:42,570
So yeah, I would give it away.
You're going to have to listen
14
00:00:42,610 --> 00:00:46,170
after the the intro to to hear
how long we've been in this
15
00:00:46,170 --> 00:00:50,050
industry, Is there many, many
veterans in this industry who
16
00:00:50,050 --> 00:00:54,450
give their advice on how to keep
going on in this industry, how
17
00:00:54,450 --> 00:00:57,930
to have longevity in this
industry.
18
00:00:57,930 --> 00:01:00,740
So yeah, I hope you listen and
join Lun.
19
00:01:00,860 --> 00:01:12,340
All right.
Hello and a warm welcome to this
20
00:01:12,340 --> 00:01:15,820
week's episode of the PPC Chat
Roundup, a podcast where I round
21
00:01:15,820 --> 00:01:19,510
up the usually Twitter
discussion that happens on
22
00:01:19,510 --> 00:01:22,950
Tuesdays at 5:00 PM GMT.
I'm your host Anu and I'm
23
00:01:22,950 --> 00:01:25,630
recording from my studio here in
London, UK and I use this
24
00:01:25,630 --> 00:01:28,830
platform to share not just
expert but also my ideas and
25
00:01:28,830 --> 00:01:31,990
considered best practices about
paid media and the direction the
26
00:01:31,990 --> 00:01:34,870
digital industry is going in.
So if you wanna keep up to date
27
00:01:34,870 --> 00:01:37,630
with my tips and tricks in the
industry and get the latest on
28
00:01:37,630 --> 00:01:39,830
the podcast that has been called
your go to.
29
00:01:40,420 --> 00:01:43,460
If you don't make it to the PPC
chat, live discussions and even
30
00:01:43,460 --> 00:01:47,740
if you do then like follow,
share and retweet or reshare or
31
00:01:47,740 --> 00:01:51,500
repost on Twitter and threads
with my handle the marketing
32
00:01:51,580 --> 00:01:53,900
annu.
Or join us on our LinkedIn group
33
00:01:53,900 --> 00:01:57,940
which is the PPC chat roundup.
Or if you're on Instagram, you
34
00:01:57,940 --> 00:02:01,540
can check us out at PPC chat on
this call roundup to get quotes
35
00:02:01,740 --> 00:02:03,740
and snippets from our previous
episodes.
36
00:02:04,140 --> 00:02:07,660
So, yeah, we have Julie taken us
on a great topic of the business
37
00:02:07,660 --> 00:02:12,440
of PPC and you might have gotten
a few clues from my intro, from
38
00:02:12,440 --> 00:02:17,440
some stuff that I what I've just
said here right after the intro
39
00:02:17,440 --> 00:02:22,560
music as to the the the feelings
that we're having towards
40
00:02:22,560 --> 00:02:26,840
Twitter at the moment.
So you know I said usually the
41
00:02:26,840 --> 00:02:29,440
Twitter discussion, why that
specifically?
42
00:02:29,440 --> 00:02:31,320
Because today we had the
discussion on Slack.
43
00:02:31,640 --> 00:02:35,240
So yeah, we we tested that out.
It was amazing, You know, the
44
00:02:35,320 --> 00:02:38,570
all the questions were written
out and all the answers were put
45
00:02:38,570 --> 00:02:41,330
in threads of that question.
So I think that was a great
46
00:02:41,330 --> 00:02:44,250
method of doing it.
And yes, I'm on threads because
47
00:02:44,250 --> 00:02:47,890
Twitter is becoming a bit of a
bum site.
48
00:02:48,250 --> 00:02:50,090
I feel it's just getting all
crazy.
49
00:02:50,090 --> 00:02:54,690
There was a new branding.
It's not a cold X, not even sure
50
00:02:55,290 --> 00:02:57,770
my brain cannot even get my head
around that.
51
00:02:58,090 --> 00:03:02,090
So you'll probably be hearing
more about my podcast episode on
52
00:03:02,090 --> 00:03:05,050
threads on Twitter.
A little bit on Twitter, if they
53
00:03:05,700 --> 00:03:09,660
they still allow it for as much
as the for as long as the PPC
54
00:03:09,660 --> 00:03:14,340
community is still on there, on
LinkedIn as usual for my podcast
55
00:03:14,340 --> 00:03:18,100
Friday post and as well
elsewhere on Instagram as I
56
00:03:18,100 --> 00:03:21,180
mentioned on there as well.
We're also on Facebook, so check
57
00:03:21,180 --> 00:03:24,120
us out on there.
So yeah, enough of the rambling.
58
00:03:24,120 --> 00:03:28,280
Let's see how this Slack
conversation went before we
59
00:03:28,520 --> 00:03:31,240
Julie goes into the questions
she reads out saying that, yeah,
60
00:03:31,240 --> 00:03:34,800
this chat is intended for PPC
professionals of all levels, and
61
00:03:34,800 --> 00:03:37,040
if you have something you want
to share, please do.
62
00:03:37,240 --> 00:03:39,520
We are a friendly and supportive
community.
63
00:03:39,720 --> 00:03:42,200
Please don't be afraid to
participate.
64
00:03:42,200 --> 00:03:47,000
So even though we've got about
457 people in this Slack channel
65
00:03:47,000 --> 00:03:51,160
specifically, it's only like a
handful of of people that do
66
00:03:51,450 --> 00:03:54,330
join the chat.
And we we're welcoming everybody
67
00:03:54,330 --> 00:03:57,410
that just wants to lurk around
or people who just want to
68
00:03:57,410 --> 00:03:59,730
listen to the podcast.
You are very, very welcome.
69
00:03:59,730 --> 00:04:04,690
And thank you for listening to
another episode as we journey
70
00:04:04,970 --> 00:04:07,290
into this new world of Slack
chat.
71
00:04:07,610 --> 00:04:10,970
Slack chat, could that be a new
phrase instead of Twitter chat
72
00:04:10,970 --> 00:04:13,090
is a Slack chat.
Let's get into our questions.
73
00:04:13,090 --> 00:04:16,810
So question 1, Julie asks how
long have you been working in
74
00:04:16,810 --> 00:04:20,250
PPC and are you or have you been
agency in House of consultant
75
00:04:20,760 --> 00:04:23,880
freelancer?
Julia Vice herself says 15 years
76
00:04:24,160 --> 00:04:28,520
agency life is the PPC person.
So yeah, agency life as the PPC
77
00:04:28,520 --> 00:04:31,320
person for her.
I've also been close to 15 years
78
00:04:31,320 --> 00:04:33,160
now.
I've done all of the above.
79
00:04:33,160 --> 00:04:39,560
So I have been in house agency
tech company now freelancer.
80
00:04:40,180 --> 00:04:43,820
I've done it all I feel Julie
goes I've been working in PPC
81
00:04:43,820 --> 00:04:47,300
since literally the beginning
and I'm a consultant and always
82
00:04:47,300 --> 00:04:49,900
have been.
Melissa McKee goes, yeah I'm
83
00:04:49,900 --> 00:04:53,220
doing it with a 121 years since
2002.
84
00:04:53,220 --> 00:04:55,540
I started in inhouse and did
that for five years.
85
00:04:55,780 --> 00:04:58,220
Fraser Andrews goes been working
in PPC for eight years
86
00:04:58,220 --> 00:05:01,660
predominantly agency side.
I did have a brief stint in
87
00:05:01,660 --> 00:05:05,100
higher education marketing for
UK Uni, but discovered it
88
00:05:05,100 --> 00:05:08,370
definitely wasn't for me,
Michelle Yeager says.
89
00:05:08,370 --> 00:05:12,570
Technically eight years OMG,
first three at Google as an
90
00:05:12,570 --> 00:05:15,610
account manager and then past
five as a solar consultant.
91
00:05:15,610 --> 00:05:18,490
I attempted a few other things
on the side.
92
00:05:18,490 --> 00:05:21,970
Wine making grad school
interesting and this has been
93
00:05:21,970 --> 00:05:24,450
the bulk of my income for the
past five years.
94
00:05:24,890 --> 00:05:27,490
Gil Gilner goes, yeah, marketing
since 2008.
95
00:05:27,490 --> 00:05:30,570
PPC specifically.
Only since 2016 I was inhouse
96
00:05:30,570 --> 00:05:34,570
director of special projects a
KA marketing Jack of all trades.
97
00:05:34,970 --> 00:05:37,970
Travis Bare shell responds
saying, yeah, I've been in PPC
98
00:05:37,970 --> 00:05:41,810
for about 10 years, mostly
agency side and consulting for
99
00:05:41,810 --> 00:05:45,170
the past five years.
Started across all digital
100
00:05:45,170 --> 00:05:48,730
channels, social search,
display, video, audio and now
101
00:05:48,730 --> 00:05:51,730
specialized predominantly in
SEM&SCEO.
102
00:05:52,130 --> 00:05:55,930
Dave Gallegos goes there.
I'm in the 20 plus camp PBC
103
00:05:55,930 --> 00:06:00,290
affiliate to start later agency
and in house Dan Patterson goes
104
00:06:00,290 --> 00:06:04,670
I started an SEO then in 2010
moved in house and took over PPC
105
00:06:04,670 --> 00:06:08,230
display and affiliates as well.
And yeah Ashton Cargo's been in
106
00:06:08,230 --> 00:06:11,870
the agency and consulting life
for five years not always PPC.
107
00:06:12,510 --> 00:06:15,430
And yeah Julie then answers Dan
Patterson who mentioned his
108
00:06:15,430 --> 00:06:18,510
stint with starting with SEO.
Julie goes I did SEO back in the
109
00:06:18,510 --> 00:06:21,350
beginning to you know when you
could make a decent title tag
110
00:06:21,350 --> 00:06:25,910
and get on page one of Google.
Julie goes as well same.
111
00:06:26,150 --> 00:06:30,330
So Julia Vice even saying SEO
writer to PPC Dan Patterson's
112
00:06:30,330 --> 00:06:33,370
gag goes Back in the good old
days I set up a stupid little
113
00:06:33,370 --> 00:06:37,010
WordPress site and was beating
out major banks for sometimes
114
00:06:37,010 --> 00:06:39,330
nice one.
Fraze Andrews goes.
115
00:06:39,330 --> 00:06:43,210
Yeah I did six months of PPC and
SEO work in my first agency and
116
00:06:43,210 --> 00:06:46,210
I cannot stress enough how
beneficial even having the
117
00:06:46,210 --> 00:06:48,170
smallest level of SEO knowledge
has helped.
118
00:06:48,570 --> 00:06:51,090
I don't think I ever really
bought into the whole SEO versus
119
00:06:51,090 --> 00:06:53,930
PPC thing.
I am so glad to hear that and
120
00:06:53,930 --> 00:06:58,830
even I did a chat with Viaduct
Jen earlier on today about our
121
00:06:58,830 --> 00:07:01,790
SEO and PPC can work well
together and the benefits of
122
00:07:01,790 --> 00:07:04,830
both and Fraser Goes are we all
SEO converts.
123
00:07:04,990 --> 00:07:09,510
Melissa goes not me being in PPC
from the beginning and Gil
124
00:07:09,510 --> 00:07:12,110
Gilner says I did almost
exclusively SEO for the first
125
00:07:12,110 --> 00:07:14,870
few years as well.
I also did SEO in the first
126
00:07:14,870 --> 00:07:18,270
first few months of my career,
but it was more linked building
127
00:07:18,670 --> 00:07:21,150
and it was very boring and
salesy.
128
00:07:21,150 --> 00:07:25,110
So I got out of there quick and
glad that I landed in PPC.
129
00:07:25,110 --> 00:07:27,550
Fraser Andrews goes, I couldn't
call myself a convert.
130
00:07:27,550 --> 00:07:31,520
I literally fell into a CEO but
was always interested in PPC
131
00:07:31,520 --> 00:07:35,360
because of the data.
Yeah and Dave Semperon says I'm
132
00:07:35,360 --> 00:07:38,600
I I just joined the channel.
I've been doing PPC for 14 years
133
00:07:38,880 --> 00:07:41,280
River goes.
I've been in PPC for over 15
134
00:07:41,280 --> 00:07:43,280
years now and have been all of
the above.
135
00:07:43,320 --> 00:07:47,280
Agency inhouse consultancy
freelance big little like me
136
00:07:47,640 --> 00:07:50,520
Dave Gallegos goes random ad I
hate when people hate on
137
00:07:50,520 --> 00:07:53,640
domainers.
I feel like they are cure people
138
00:07:53,640 --> 00:07:58,920
too like Seo's and PPCRS.
That's interesting, the tertiary
139
00:07:58,920 --> 00:08:00,280
goes.
I've been in marketing since
140
00:08:00,280 --> 00:08:03,320
2019, so quite young.
I was a freelancer before, a
141
00:08:03,320 --> 00:08:07,360
full stock developer, automation
developer for funnel marketing.
142
00:08:07,360 --> 00:08:09,720
I did that for seven years
before I go into PPC.
143
00:08:10,320 --> 00:08:13,240
Now the Hopkins goes 15 years
and I've done it all in house.
144
00:08:13,240 --> 00:08:15,960
Software agency.
I'm a SAS girl at heart, but I
145
00:08:15,960 --> 00:08:18,720
value my other experiences as
well.
146
00:08:18,720 --> 00:08:22,280
Jillian Phillips as well.
I've been in PPC for five years
147
00:08:22,280 --> 00:08:24,880
doing Brown.
I've been in PPC since for 17
148
00:08:24,880 --> 00:08:28,970
years since I got started.
Been 17 years even since I got
149
00:08:28,970 --> 00:08:31,930
started the last seven years.
Running an agency.
150
00:08:32,010 --> 00:08:36,530
So it's a very good agency.
Take some risks.com, check them
151
00:08:36,530 --> 00:08:39,690
out.
Robert Brady, PPC since 2006.
152
00:08:39,690 --> 00:08:42,929
Agency and consulting mostly
with a small in house stint at
153
00:08:42,929 --> 00:08:45,450
the beginning.
Austin Dillman in house from
154
00:08:45,450 --> 00:08:48,690
2006 to 2019.
Starting my consulting business
155
00:08:48,690 --> 00:08:51,890
in March 2019 and never looked
back.
156
00:08:52,440 --> 00:08:55,440
And those are answers for
question one and look at all the
157
00:08:55,440 --> 00:08:58,840
experience shared then.
This is why this is such an
158
00:08:58,840 --> 00:09:03,080
amazing group to follow and to
to hear what they have to say on
159
00:09:03,080 --> 00:09:05,880
things.
So we go to question 2.
160
00:09:05,880 --> 00:09:08,680
Julie asks, let's start with
contracts or agreements.
161
00:09:09,040 --> 00:09:11,840
Do you currently use contracts
or agreements with your clients?
162
00:09:11,840 --> 00:09:14,840
If not, why not?
Julia, VICE, yes.
163
00:09:15,000 --> 00:09:17,200
Oh heck here.
And we have a whole legal team
164
00:09:17,200 --> 00:09:19,910
to help us with it.
Julie goes, yeah, absolutely,
165
00:09:19,910 --> 00:09:22,750
100% of the time, yes.
Gil Gilner goes, yes.
166
00:09:22,750 --> 00:09:25,950
But usually clients have counsel
that develop their contracts and
167
00:09:25,950 --> 00:09:29,550
we have to adapt.
Melissa 100% Yes, very different
168
00:09:29,550 --> 00:09:31,830
at a small agency versus the
whole code though.
169
00:09:32,630 --> 00:09:35,670
And Michelle Yeager goes, yes I
do, Mostly for legal reasons by.
170
00:09:35,990 --> 00:09:39,510
But practically so far it's been
the best way for me to try to
171
00:09:39,510 --> 00:09:42,790
clarify the scope from the
beginning as an attempt to avoid
172
00:09:42,790 --> 00:09:46,470
massive scope creep.
I think it has helped, but I'm
173
00:09:46,470 --> 00:09:50,350
still majorly struggling with
boundaries, scope creep, knowing
174
00:09:50,350 --> 00:09:52,790
when to say no.
As a consultant, I find myself
175
00:09:52,790 --> 00:09:56,790
in a lot of Gray areas, which I
think might be more of a me
176
00:09:57,110 --> 00:10:00,280
problem and Gil Gillner goes.
In my experience, the bigger
177
00:10:00,280 --> 00:10:03,520
clients have bigger requirements
is a hassle, but I guess it pays
178
00:10:03,520 --> 00:10:06,040
off in the end.
Most of our smaller clients just
179
00:10:06,040 --> 00:10:09,120
do a a boilerplate sort of
thing.
180
00:10:09,480 --> 00:10:12,640
However, a lot of our clients
are foreign, so the contracts
181
00:10:12,640 --> 00:10:16,200
are questionably enforceable
either way.
182
00:10:16,760 --> 00:10:19,440
I say yeah, currently no, but
even when I was freelance, I
183
00:10:19,440 --> 00:10:24,540
dealt with contracting agencies.
So agencies that dual let me
184
00:10:24,540 --> 00:10:27,620
know about agent digital
marketing agencies that are
185
00:10:27,620 --> 00:10:32,700
looking for people to hire on a
freelance basis.
186
00:10:32,740 --> 00:10:36,790
And so they dealt with the
contracts and yeah, I just had
187
00:10:36,790 --> 00:10:39,750
to invoice every month and it
was always done through the
188
00:10:39,750 --> 00:10:42,950
agency and I'll be paid at
Friday of every week.
189
00:10:43,150 --> 00:10:45,750
Well every Friday.
So he was ah, I missed that.
190
00:10:45,750 --> 00:10:49,670
But yeah, trying to find clients
was also a tough started
191
00:10:49,670 --> 00:10:52,110
becoming a bit tough.
So yeah, didn't want to do that
192
00:10:52,110 --> 00:10:55,150
and some clients will delay
payment which is annoying.
193
00:10:55,550 --> 00:10:57,670
But no that's when I wasn't
using the agency.
194
00:10:57,670 --> 00:11:00,710
So yeah different experiences
Travis.
195
00:11:00,710 --> 00:11:04,560
Responsing agreement with
periodic Sow's and change
196
00:11:04,560 --> 00:11:07,160
orders.
Most clients have legal that
197
00:11:07,280 --> 00:11:10,880
legal that modifies the MSA.
That's an MSA as needed and
198
00:11:10,880 --> 00:11:13,600
Sow's and CEO's are rarely
touched, only signed.
199
00:11:14,080 --> 00:11:15,880
Julie goes.
Agreements or contracts both
200
00:11:15,880 --> 00:11:19,960
cover your butt and also clearly
layout expectations and terms
201
00:11:19,960 --> 00:11:23,120
when done properly.
Julia Weisko's contracts and
202
00:11:23,160 --> 00:11:26,240
Sow's are so important.
Never word it vaguely, but clear
203
00:11:26,520 --> 00:11:29,040
about what is included.
Yes, I'm in a discussion over
204
00:11:29,040 --> 00:11:32,020
this right now.
Nitish goes, yes, we are using
205
00:11:32,020 --> 00:11:34,900
contracts with every client
shared some very helpful tips
206
00:11:34,900 --> 00:11:39,100
regarding contracts as in Julie.
Julie Bichini shared very
207
00:11:39,100 --> 00:11:42,620
helpful tips regarding contracts
over Foxwall PPC discussion last
208
00:11:42,620 --> 00:11:44,460
week.
Thanks for that.
209
00:11:44,900 --> 00:11:47,940
Julie goes, I have had to sue a
client, so trust me when I say
210
00:11:47,940 --> 00:11:50,820
read all contracts and be sure
what is in them.
211
00:11:50,900 --> 00:11:56,850
Oh my God, read your contracts,
read, read, read the contract.
212
00:11:56,850 --> 00:12:00,530
It's so annoying with clients
who are going, Oh yeah, you
213
00:12:00,530 --> 00:12:03,450
tricked us into a new term.
No we didn't.
214
00:12:03,450 --> 00:12:07,290
If you read your contract, we're
following exactly what the term
215
00:12:07,330 --> 00:12:10,770
period is and what the rules of
the term of a current contract
216
00:12:10,770 --> 00:12:13,530
is.
And then Julia Vice goes, yeah,
217
00:12:13,530 --> 00:12:20,150
we are essentially at 150% on
hours due to reasons, but 50% on
218
00:12:20,150 --> 00:12:23,270
revenue from the pitch.
And now they want more stuff
219
00:12:23,270 --> 00:12:25,750
that is technically in scope,
says Madams.
220
00:12:25,750 --> 00:12:28,670
And all clients everywhere.
You cannot have what's in the
221
00:12:28,670 --> 00:12:33,110
SOW's if you consistently ask
for more than we agreed to
222
00:12:33,510 --> 00:12:36,510
deliver.
Julie also says, I also let me
223
00:12:36,510 --> 00:12:40,550
say here that if a client is
ever giving you grief about
224
00:12:40,550 --> 00:12:43,270
signing a contract, take that as
a major red flag.
225
00:12:43,270 --> 00:12:45,670
Absolutely.
If they are worried about a
226
00:12:45,670 --> 00:12:48,110
particular aspect of the
language, discuss it.
227
00:12:48,590 --> 00:12:52,350
I always stress that contracts
protect both parties, as the
228
00:12:52,350 --> 00:12:56,550
scope of work, price and other
details are all clearly defined
229
00:12:56,550 --> 00:13:01,190
and agreed to by both parties.
Now, Hopkins responds, saying
230
00:13:01,470 --> 00:13:05,750
contracts are safeguards for
both the clients and us. 10,000
231
00:13:05,750 --> 00:13:09,210
percent, 100,000% even they are
there.
232
00:13:09,370 --> 00:13:12,650
I will say I shifted my
perspective from six months or
233
00:13:12,650 --> 00:13:16,810
an annual to month to month.
This is in large part due to how
234
00:13:16,810 --> 00:13:20,770
campaigns types have shifted.
Google Now responsing We are
235
00:13:20,770 --> 00:13:24,090
month to month for the vast
majority of our clients as well.
236
00:13:24,090 --> 00:13:29,610
Some are annual duly responsing.
I use a hybrid model Nava with a
237
00:13:29,610 --> 00:13:33,130
commitment of three months after
the discovery strategy initial
238
00:13:33,170 --> 00:13:37,380
implementation part is complete
and then month to month after
239
00:13:37,460 --> 00:13:40,060
that phrase.
Andrews response saying super
240
00:13:40,060 --> 00:13:43,540
interesting around SOW and good
and bad clients.
241
00:13:43,980 --> 00:13:47,860
Bit of a plug, but Kirk Williams
of course stop the scale
242
00:13:47,860 --> 00:13:51,220
outlines.
So Kirk's book Stop the Scale
243
00:13:51,460 --> 00:13:53,860
outlines really well.
Some practical approaches to
244
00:13:53,860 --> 00:13:56,820
stop scope of work getting out
of hand?
245
00:13:56,820 --> 00:13:59,520
Absolutely, Julia.
Vice responsing, we stick to
246
00:13:59,560 --> 00:14:03,920
annual with 30 day out clauses
on both sides.
247
00:14:04,280 --> 00:14:08,160
The difference comes down to
retainer plus percentage or
248
00:14:08,160 --> 00:14:10,080
hourly.
There are good and bad versions
249
00:14:10,080 --> 00:14:13,280
of each.
We use an initial three month
250
00:14:13,280 --> 00:14:17,240
contract and after that it's
transitioned to monthly and
251
00:14:17,240 --> 00:14:20,200
Navagos as well saying I think
the other factor is whether
252
00:14:20,200 --> 00:14:23,560
we're percentage of spend or
flat rate lead or management
253
00:14:23,560 --> 00:14:26,200
fee.
I find that clients who go lead
254
00:14:26,200 --> 00:14:30,320
based or performance based need
more timelines in place in the
255
00:14:30,320 --> 00:14:33,920
contract because they get
temperamental general
256
00:14:33,920 --> 00:14:37,240
management.
There tends to be more trust
257
00:14:37,640 --> 00:14:40,640
doing Brown responsing.
We have a proposal SOW's and
258
00:14:40,640 --> 00:14:44,580
contracts as one doc.
We use Proposify to get
259
00:14:44,580 --> 00:14:46,900
everything digital digitally
signed.
260
00:14:47,260 --> 00:14:51,340
Been using it since 2019 and it
works well for clients of all
261
00:14:51,340 --> 00:14:54,140
sizes.
Julian Phillips says they are my
262
00:14:54,140 --> 00:14:57,380
most lucrative contracts so far
have been verbal, but I have
263
00:14:57,380 --> 00:15:00,980
much to learn about this stuff.
His contracts have been verbal.
264
00:15:01,220 --> 00:15:02,740
Oh, interesting.
Curious to see what others have
265
00:15:02,740 --> 00:15:05,340
been doing.
Well, we've listed it all out
266
00:15:05,340 --> 00:15:08,820
there for you Julian, and then
Brown says I know some who don't
267
00:15:08,820 --> 00:15:10,700
use one.
Those few times clients
268
00:15:10,700 --> 00:15:12,620
questions what we did or didn't
do.
269
00:15:12,620 --> 00:15:17,020
And I just pointed to the
proposal sow a couple years ago.
270
00:15:17,060 --> 00:15:20,540
One client wanted to shove the
contract terms in our face even
271
00:15:20,540 --> 00:15:23,660
when they didn't read it.
Then two weeks claim they are
272
00:15:23,660 --> 00:15:27,140
unsure that if we did something
because unsure of the very
273
00:15:27,140 --> 00:15:31,060
contract they had access to.
You cannot make this stuff up.
274
00:15:31,060 --> 00:15:34,820
Better to get it in writing.
As Julie Bichini said, not
275
00:15:34,820 --> 00:15:37,060
wanting to sign one is a big red
flag.
276
00:15:37,140 --> 00:15:41,220
Have good agencies.
Peeps are not pieces.
277
00:15:41,220 --> 00:15:44,700
You can just change out and
everything will be fine.
278
00:15:45,420 --> 00:15:48,060
Eric, how can responsing I tend
to work with smaller, more
279
00:15:48,060 --> 00:15:52,500
personal businesses with major
contract legalese isn't what
280
00:15:52,580 --> 00:15:56,500
either party cares for.
Sure, it exposes me to some more
281
00:15:56,500 --> 00:16:00,140
risk, but from a legal
standpoint, agreement emails
282
00:16:00,140 --> 00:16:03,900
with terms are legally binding,
just not as airtight.
283
00:16:04,480 --> 00:16:07,360
Robert Brady says I always have
a contract or agreement in place
284
00:16:07,520 --> 00:16:11,240
signed by both parties helps to
clarify the payment terms and
285
00:16:11,240 --> 00:16:13,560
scope.
It's a rolling month to month so
286
00:16:13,560 --> 00:16:17,400
I'm not locking anything into a
long term deal.
287
00:16:17,800 --> 00:16:23,280
So an Austin Dillman goes, every
client gets an NDA, MSA and SOW
288
00:16:23,880 --> 00:16:27,000
MSA.
We need a new acronym fill for
289
00:16:27,000 --> 00:16:31,510
that one and we simply go on to
question three, saying is there
290
00:16:31,510 --> 00:16:35,310
anything in your contract that
is there because you learned
291
00:16:35,310 --> 00:16:38,030
something the hard way?
If so, what is it?
292
00:16:38,030 --> 00:16:41,950
So what have people learned the
hard way and decided to put in
293
00:16:42,110 --> 00:16:43,950
interesting fact here that I
learned.
294
00:16:43,950 --> 00:16:49,590
I think it was doing my Rd. test
or Rd. driving test or something
295
00:16:49,590 --> 00:16:50,990
like that.
The lessons I was taking.
296
00:16:51,190 --> 00:16:55,070
One of my instructors said that
some signs, like the signs of
297
00:16:55,070 --> 00:16:58,380
like, you know, slow down.
You're about to go to an area
298
00:16:58,380 --> 00:17:01,660
that you can't see around the
bend and there's a sign of like
299
00:17:02,020 --> 00:17:05,660
a boomerang shaped sign kind of
thing telling you to slow down.
300
00:17:06,099 --> 00:17:10,140
Those kind of signs came into
place after an accident
301
00:17:10,140 --> 00:17:13,099
happened, so on some roads.
So they don't just put it
302
00:17:13,180 --> 00:17:15,700
everywhere, they put it after an
accident happened.
303
00:17:15,900 --> 00:17:19,119
So it just reminds me of that
because obviously you're asking
304
00:17:19,119 --> 00:17:22,560
the question of what have you
put in place after an accident
305
00:17:22,560 --> 00:17:24,839
has happened.
So Melissa McKee kicks us off
306
00:17:24,839 --> 00:17:28,000
saying I learned to spell out
the exact meeting and reporting
307
00:17:28,000 --> 00:17:30,520
cadence.
Otherwise your smallest client,
308
00:17:30,560 --> 00:17:34,200
smallest clients will demand the
biggest chunk of your time
309
00:17:34,200 --> 00:17:36,480
always.
It's the smallest, the ones that
310
00:17:36,480 --> 00:17:40,040
that that pay the least that
will demand the most honesty
311
00:17:40,480 --> 00:17:42,600
never Hopkins goes account to
build fees.
312
00:17:42,600 --> 00:17:46,810
I used to build campaigns as
part of the core engagement, but
313
00:17:46,810 --> 00:17:50,930
I found that folks who pay for
the build are more invested and
314
00:17:50,930 --> 00:17:54,450
buy into the process more than
those who get it for free.
315
00:17:54,890 --> 00:17:57,650
Julie Vice responsing?
Yes, actually, but it's a pretty
316
00:17:57,650 --> 00:18:01,090
corporate example.
We need credit protection ends
317
00:18:01,370 --> 00:18:05,010
for clients because we buy all
media and then bill it plus
318
00:18:05,010 --> 00:18:07,210
fees.
If they are not creditworthy,
319
00:18:07,250 --> 00:18:09,770
all platforms have to bill them
directly.
320
00:18:10,600 --> 00:18:14,080
Delivers response in response to
Nava Hawkins saying yes, those
321
00:18:14,080 --> 00:18:17,800
build fees need to be identified
and built separately.
322
00:18:18,240 --> 00:18:21,440
Travis responds, saying the two
biggest things I've learned are
323
00:18:21,440 --> 00:18:25,400
one clause that indicates all
work product is the property of
324
00:18:25,400 --> 00:18:28,320
client campaigns, payment
profiles, data research.
325
00:18:28,320 --> 00:18:32,720
Yes, two clause that mandates
that work product may be used
326
00:18:32,960 --> 00:18:35,920
with approval in final form to
promote my business.
327
00:18:36,160 --> 00:18:37,560
So case studies that kind of
thing.
328
00:18:38,330 --> 00:18:41,450
The former satisfies clients
that they own the work, plain
329
00:18:41,450 --> 00:18:44,490
and simple.
They pay and XYZ output is
330
00:18:44,490 --> 00:18:46,570
theirs.
The latter allows for self
331
00:18:46,570 --> 00:18:50,890
promotion, earning future work
and creates A symbiosis that's
332
00:18:50,890 --> 00:18:54,730
healthy in my experience.
You'll go now respond saying no.
333
00:18:54,730 --> 00:18:57,730
In our experience we have found
that we are better served by pre
334
00:18:57,730 --> 00:19:01,450
qualifying clients than spending
too much time enforcing things.
335
00:19:01,730 --> 00:19:04,490
Of course things always slip
through the cracks, but we try
336
00:19:04,490 --> 00:19:07,610
to keep things as open and easy
as possible.
337
00:19:08,010 --> 00:19:12,530
Since we're month to month with
the vast majority of clients, we
338
00:19:12,530 --> 00:19:15,890
have never had issues.
Granted, most of our clients are
339
00:19:15,890 --> 00:19:21,090
smaller, think less than
$2,000,000 per year of of spend,
340
00:19:21,290 --> 00:19:24,050
so they are usually pretty
flexible with things.
341
00:19:24,290 --> 00:19:27,010
Almost everything is in writing
in some way or the other.
342
00:19:27,010 --> 00:19:30,010
However, phrase Andrew's
responsing normally things like
343
00:19:30,010 --> 00:19:32,730
3 month clause.
If things aren't working well
344
00:19:32,730 --> 00:19:35,890
from the offset, it allows both
parties to leave and typically
345
00:19:36,400 --> 00:19:39,960
is a good way to keep things
relatively amicable.
346
00:19:40,360 --> 00:19:43,240
Michelle responds in I include
call cadence, and also
347
00:19:43,240 --> 00:19:46,360
expectations around conversion,
tracking, troubleshooting, et
348
00:19:46,360 --> 00:19:48,920
cetera.
Julia Vice responds in I'm
349
00:19:48,920 --> 00:19:53,400
Jealous and That's here, and
she's jealous of Travis saying
350
00:19:53,400 --> 00:19:56,880
specific brand permission needed
for every blog post, awards
351
00:19:56,880 --> 00:19:59,840
submission, and conference.
So yeah, especially for the
352
00:20:00,000 --> 00:20:04,600
close to that Travis mentioned
in terms of being able to use
353
00:20:04,600 --> 00:20:08,760
the work that he's things that
he's worked on for you know,
354
00:20:08,760 --> 00:20:13,440
promotion purposes for examples,
response saying, yeah, pre
355
00:20:13,440 --> 00:20:16,920
qualification is something that
nowhere near enough agencies are
356
00:20:17,200 --> 00:20:21,000
doing but totally should never
goes pre qualify stress free
357
00:20:21,000 --> 00:20:24,080
equals pre qualify equals to
stress free contracts.
358
00:20:24,470 --> 00:20:26,950
Julie goes level of
communication that is included.
359
00:20:26,950 --> 00:20:30,470
We have all had a client who
wants to e-mail, talk, etcetera
360
00:20:30,710 --> 00:20:32,470
way too much for what they're
paying.
361
00:20:32,750 --> 00:20:36,790
My working hours and time zone
and exclusion section about what
362
00:20:36,790 --> 00:20:39,590
is not included.
Oh, she continues.
363
00:20:39,630 --> 00:20:42,710
And what is an actual emergency
and how different types are
364
00:20:42,710 --> 00:20:47,110
handled as such as one did my
work caused the emergency, two
365
00:20:47,110 --> 00:20:50,310
did the platform caused the
emergency, three did the client
366
00:20:50,310 --> 00:20:53,720
caused the emergency.
Melissa goes that's part of the
367
00:20:53,720 --> 00:20:55,600
problem with being on Slack with
clients.
368
00:20:55,600 --> 00:20:59,160
They think it gives them free
reign to just ping you all day
369
00:20:59,160 --> 00:21:02,240
and night.
And Travis responds to Julia
370
00:21:02,240 --> 00:21:05,160
Vice saying, yeah, the
conversation that I have is what
371
00:21:05,160 --> 00:21:08,720
pace do you want to operate at
If you require granular
372
00:21:08,720 --> 00:21:11,600
permissions will operate slower
than we could.
373
00:21:12,040 --> 00:21:14,640
If we can achieve a mutual
trust, we can work towards
374
00:21:14,640 --> 00:21:17,860
breakneck speed.
It's not perfect, but it served
375
00:21:17,860 --> 00:21:19,740
me well.
Clients like that.
376
00:21:19,740 --> 00:21:23,100
They have control over the
things that matter and the
377
00:21:23,100 --> 00:21:25,100
respect that I need things out
of.
378
00:21:25,100 --> 00:21:27,900
The engagement as well,
absolutely should be mutually
379
00:21:27,900 --> 00:21:31,900
beneficial, not just from a
money perspective, Julie
380
00:21:31,900 --> 00:21:34,460
responds saying yeah, in
response to Melissa McKee
381
00:21:34,460 --> 00:21:38,300
saying, I try very, very hard to
not be on clients slack.
382
00:21:38,300 --> 00:21:41,860
If they insist they pay extra
and I am not instantly available
383
00:21:41,860 --> 00:21:45,520
for them, specify how frequently
I will check their Slack on
384
00:21:45,520 --> 00:21:48,800
business days.
That part is important too.
385
00:21:49,360 --> 00:21:53,000
And yeah, Julie Vice goes that
Status notifications is IT.
386
00:21:53,440 --> 00:21:56,560
Phrase Andrews Great says 24
hours response time in the
387
00:21:56,560 --> 00:21:59,400
working week are a nice way to
ensure that clients don't
388
00:21:59,400 --> 00:22:03,200
bombard you with messages.
This response can even just be
389
00:22:03,200 --> 00:22:06,320
an acknowledgement of receiving
the message, but it helps to
390
00:22:06,320 --> 00:22:10,120
stop clients and employees
feeling the need to be on it at
391
00:22:10,120 --> 00:22:12,720
all times.
Julie Vice responds very into
392
00:22:12,720 --> 00:22:16,520
this confirming receipt note
with next steps and timelines in
393
00:22:16,520 --> 00:22:19,120
the body.
And Julie as well says make sure
394
00:22:19,120 --> 00:22:21,440
you put in there your billing
terms too.
395
00:22:21,440 --> 00:22:24,800
In terms of the contract, that
is our invoices due upon
396
00:22:24,800 --> 00:22:27,680
request, Are they due within 30
days and what happens if they
397
00:22:27,680 --> 00:22:30,200
are late?
Lots of things in contracts are
398
00:22:30,240 --> 00:22:34,080
there for worst case scenario
and just because it is in there
399
00:22:34,400 --> 00:22:36,480
does not mean you have to
enforce it.
400
00:22:36,680 --> 00:22:40,720
You can certainly tell a client
that you're waiving the fee that
401
00:22:40,760 --> 00:22:44,720
is in the contract for late
payment etc, but it is there if
402
00:22:44,720 --> 00:22:47,760
you need to enforce it.
But as it goes, yeah, same
403
00:22:47,760 --> 00:22:51,320
reconfirming receipt.
Not saying I'll drop everything
404
00:22:51,320 --> 00:22:54,000
and do this.
Now River goes, we have a list
405
00:22:54,000 --> 00:22:56,160
of our responsibilities and
their responsibilities.
406
00:22:56,160 --> 00:22:59,280
Glad we have that.
So it's clear that they need to
407
00:22:59,280 --> 00:23:03,000
pay their bills with engines,
give us assets, etc.
408
00:23:03,760 --> 00:23:07,120
I have a turnaround times
specified to Julie goes, Julia
409
00:23:07,120 --> 00:23:09,800
goes.
I love a work back schedule with
410
00:23:09,800 --> 00:23:11,480
our deliverables.
They're deliverables.
411
00:23:11,480 --> 00:23:15,360
Creative deliverables.
Google, Microsoft deliverables.
412
00:23:15,560 --> 00:23:18,400
Chefs.
Kiss van Brown goes, if I look
413
00:23:18,400 --> 00:23:22,440
back at 2019 versus now, way
more detail and sometimes
414
00:23:22,440 --> 00:23:26,200
repeating things a few times.
Comms has gotten a couple
415
00:23:26,200 --> 00:23:29,920
updates to make it more clear we
don't do weekly meetings that
416
00:23:29,920 --> 00:23:33,600
are often a waste of time for
clients of exercise.
417
00:23:34,000 --> 00:23:38,040
Gil Gilner responds saying
nearly 100% of our clients comes
418
00:23:38,080 --> 00:23:41,440
are via e-mail.
The good ones get my cell phone
419
00:23:41,440 --> 00:23:44,160
number.
Even the good ones I think
420
00:23:44,160 --> 00:23:46,040
shouldn't get your cell phone
number.
421
00:23:46,040 --> 00:23:48,720
But anyway, Michelle responds.
I've been dreaming about
422
00:23:48,720 --> 00:23:53,510
including some part about baking
in vacation time for me since I
423
00:23:53,510 --> 00:23:58,230
usually usually do retainer, but
not sure if this is standard at
424
00:23:58,310 --> 00:24:00,910
all.
Eric Hiken responds not from a
425
00:24:00,910 --> 00:24:06,310
PPC standpoint, but if I take on
any web dev job, I'm writing an
426
00:24:06,310 --> 00:24:08,070
expiry period into my
agreements.
427
00:24:08,070 --> 00:24:10,190
Moving forward.
I've agreed to read you a
428
00:24:10,190 --> 00:24:12,910
friend's business website for an
X flat fee.
429
00:24:12,910 --> 00:24:16,350
It's been probably three years
I've had the full payment, but
430
00:24:16,350 --> 00:24:18,870
he stopped providing assets to
complete the job.
431
00:24:19,310 --> 00:24:22,950
So it sits there as a liability
to me that I have yet to make
432
00:24:23,030 --> 00:24:26,790
good on.
Oh Lord, Julie goes, yeah, you
433
00:24:26,790 --> 00:24:30,270
can absolutely stipulate how
your work shifts when you are on
434
00:24:30,270 --> 00:24:32,470
vacation and what kind of notice
you give.
435
00:24:32,470 --> 00:24:36,870
Although be careful on that as
when you give too much notice, I
436
00:24:36,870 --> 00:24:39,510
swear some clients hear that
you're retiring and not going to
437
00:24:39,510 --> 00:24:42,910
the beach for a week.
So all of a sudden it's like,
438
00:24:43,230 --> 00:24:48,070
OK, let's find a new paid search
consultant, Michelle goes, LOL.
439
00:24:48,070 --> 00:24:50,550
I get worried that they are
going to freak out and be like
440
00:24:50,550 --> 00:24:53,390
checking on stuff every day and
assuming things are emergencies
441
00:24:53,390 --> 00:24:56,990
when they are not, but I think I
need to just do it at some
442
00:24:56,990 --> 00:24:59,750
point.
Austin Dillman goes, yeah, more
443
00:24:59,750 --> 00:25:02,790
thorough in scope and out of
scope sections and stricter
444
00:25:02,790 --> 00:25:06,510
payment terms.
Minimum 50% upfront before work
445
00:25:06,510 --> 00:25:08,790
starts and shorter payment
cycles.
446
00:25:09,070 --> 00:25:13,270
Net 15 and now we go on to
question four.
447
00:25:13,470 --> 00:25:17,150
What is your biggest challenge
on the business side of PPC?
448
00:25:17,510 --> 00:25:21,470
Gilgilna goes hiring.
Nitish goes our second at a very
449
00:25:21,470 --> 00:25:24,030
time intensive process that I do
not enjoy.
450
00:25:24,510 --> 00:25:26,390
Julian Phillips goes finding new
clients.
451
00:25:26,390 --> 00:25:30,710
My first client is an agency and
I manage a number of accounts
452
00:25:30,710 --> 00:25:33,190
through them.
However, the time has come where
453
00:25:33,190 --> 00:25:36,190
I need to attract new clients
and I feel out of practice.
454
00:25:36,670 --> 00:25:41,170
Julia Weiss goes expectations.
I am great at what I do, and I
455
00:25:41,170 --> 00:25:43,810
lead a great team.
We are not Wizards and can't
456
00:25:43,810 --> 00:25:45,890
force Google to do things it
won't do.
457
00:25:45,890 --> 00:25:50,410
Clients tend to be unrealistic
about my limitations how much of
458
00:25:50,410 --> 00:25:53,050
their budgets can afford, and
partners like Google can be
459
00:25:53,050 --> 00:25:56,610
unrealistic about how much
budgets my clients actually
460
00:25:56,610 --> 00:25:58,890
have.
Travis goes inevitably.
461
00:25:58,890 --> 00:26:02,240
PPC is like a spool of yarn that
unravels.
462
00:26:02,320 --> 00:26:06,000
It uncovers creative and query
level insights that make clients
463
00:26:06,000 --> 00:26:08,160
go.
I need to address that.
464
00:26:08,720 --> 00:26:12,520
The resulting scope creep and
getting clients to pay for it is
465
00:26:12,520 --> 00:26:16,280
the biggest challenge for me.
Me, I said people not paying
466
00:26:16,280 --> 00:26:18,400
their invoices or even not on
time.
467
00:26:18,400 --> 00:26:21,600
So when they're just very late
with it and pretending they have
468
00:26:21,600 --> 00:26:25,880
no idea, we will make of
responsing pricing what clients
469
00:26:25,880 --> 00:26:29,320
can realistically and actually
afford to pay versus all the
470
00:26:29,320 --> 00:26:33,240
various costs involved.
A Julie goes, we can help you
471
00:26:33,240 --> 00:26:36,520
get better at this.
That was to Gillian Phillips,
472
00:26:36,960 --> 00:26:38,720
Fraser goes managing
expectations.
473
00:26:38,720 --> 00:26:42,920
I think it's always one a huge
part of tackling that is cross
474
00:26:42,920 --> 00:26:46,560
training teams to understand
that is what is isn't
475
00:26:46,600 --> 00:26:49,240
acceptable.
Also pricing can often be an
476
00:26:49,240 --> 00:26:51,360
ongoing issue.
It takes a lot to say.
477
00:26:51,360 --> 00:26:53,200
We've built this pricing for a
reason.
478
00:26:53,640 --> 00:26:56,680
One can't go lower.
Of course, there's some room for
479
00:26:56,680 --> 00:27:01,720
movement, but clients asking for
50% off is a huge red flag.
480
00:27:01,720 --> 00:27:04,680
Yeah, right.
Nava goes, yeah, to Gil's points
481
00:27:04,720 --> 00:27:07,360
charge upfront and don't do work
till it's paid.
482
00:27:07,880 --> 00:27:11,280
And Nava goes.
I lost roughly 15 K 15,000.
483
00:27:11,280 --> 00:27:14,320
Yeah.
Dollars. 15 K dollars because of
484
00:27:14,320 --> 00:27:16,080
trust in the decency of human
beings.
485
00:27:16,080 --> 00:27:18,360
Never again.
And then Julia Weiss goes, yeah,
486
00:27:18,360 --> 00:27:22,440
an immediate discount, 100%.
No, a la Pubel.
487
00:27:22,900 --> 00:27:24,420
I imagine that's how to say
nothing.
488
00:27:24,420 --> 00:27:27,900
Not possible.
If I'm too much, go find less
489
00:27:27,900 --> 00:27:31,180
exactly careful, find less in
price and go find less in the
490
00:27:31,180 --> 00:27:32,940
level of work that you're going
to get.
491
00:27:33,380 --> 00:27:36,420
Gil Gilner goes, we charge
upfront for every client.
492
00:27:36,500 --> 00:27:41,380
Even our annual clients pay in
one lump annual sum upfront.
493
00:27:41,700 --> 00:27:44,780
Wow, I find that very bold.
I find that very scary to do.
494
00:27:45,580 --> 00:27:48,620
Julie goes, yeah, prior to that,
getting checks in a timely
495
00:27:48,620 --> 00:27:53,100
manner was challenging about 50%
of the time for ongoing clients.
496
00:27:53,540 --> 00:27:57,500
And Michelle goes, yeah, the
Pandora's box that PPC lovers to
497
00:27:57,500 --> 00:28:00,980
open, that loves to open.
It leads to an insane amount of
498
00:28:00,980 --> 00:28:03,980
business related things for
clients that go way beyond the
499
00:28:03,980 --> 00:28:08,540
normal scope of what PPC is.
So yeah, the ensuing scope creep
500
00:28:08,540 --> 00:28:12,240
for me is the issue.
Julia Vice goes businesses have
501
00:28:12,240 --> 00:28:14,240
to pay.
It doesn't have to be emotional
502
00:28:14,240 --> 00:28:16,200
or dramatic.
Here's the bill, here's the
503
00:28:16,200 --> 00:28:18,280
payment terms.
If you need relief, we'll have a
504
00:28:18,280 --> 00:28:20,840
discussion and move on from
there.
505
00:28:21,200 --> 00:28:24,160
Julie as well says always get
paid at least some of the money
506
00:28:24,160 --> 00:28:29,040
upfront and do not let them get
too far into you if they are
507
00:28:29,040 --> 00:28:32,280
slow players.
We can't repossess our work, so
508
00:28:32,280 --> 00:28:35,920
make sure you're staying in pace
with the clients payments and if
509
00:28:36,390 --> 00:28:39,950
they start out great and then
get slow, address it in the
510
00:28:39,950 --> 00:28:43,350
first month.
And yeah, Nitish as well says
511
00:28:43,350 --> 00:28:46,590
contract needs to be signed, an
invoice paid before any work
512
00:28:46,590 --> 00:28:49,030
gets started.
Also every step of onboarding
513
00:28:49,350 --> 00:28:52,030
needs to be done before we start
working.
514
00:28:52,510 --> 00:28:55,390
Navigo is helping clients
understand whether they are in
515
00:28:55,390 --> 00:29:00,020
fact the right fit for PPC.
I see a lot of folks swindled
516
00:29:00,020 --> 00:29:03,540
into smaller budgets that are
not going to do anything, not
517
00:29:03,540 --> 00:29:06,620
knocking great account
management of smaller accounts.
518
00:29:06,620 --> 00:29:09,260
I just find it's more common
than smaller budgets.
519
00:29:09,300 --> 00:29:13,220
Accounts struggle here the most.
I talk more people out of
520
00:29:13,220 --> 00:29:16,540
running Google ads nowadays than
I do empowering them to leverage
521
00:29:16,580 --> 00:29:20,620
it because of auction prices and
creative requirements.
522
00:29:21,220 --> 00:29:23,780
Dan Patterson goes Honest
question for those of you that
523
00:29:23,860 --> 00:29:28,060
are agencies of fly solo with
all the big strategies and other
524
00:29:28,060 --> 00:29:30,980
services available in Google, is
it harder to justify your
525
00:29:30,980 --> 00:29:34,420
services these days or do you
mainly focus on consulting,
526
00:29:34,500 --> 00:29:38,300
working for companies that don't
have an internal team etcetera,
527
00:29:38,580 --> 00:29:41,940
something I've been wondering
about for a while now.
528
00:29:43,220 --> 00:29:46,340
Travis goes, yeah, for initial
work I charged 50% upfront and
529
00:29:46,460 --> 00:29:50,380
and then I'm Moretize the rest
of the bill over the remaining
530
00:29:50,380 --> 00:29:53,500
duration of work together it
requires both parties leaning in
531
00:29:53,500 --> 00:29:56,340
and serves well for longer term
agreements.
532
00:29:56,890 --> 00:29:59,770
Julia Vice responds to Dan
Patterson and his work on terms
533
00:29:59,770 --> 00:30:03,530
of getting clients.
Yeah, especially the whole bit
534
00:30:03,530 --> 00:30:07,250
strategies development and
automation development in Google
535
00:30:07,250 --> 00:30:09,610
especially Julia Vice was not at
all.
536
00:30:09,610 --> 00:30:13,090
While individual bit strategies
are more automated they still
537
00:30:13,090 --> 00:30:15,810
need expert advice and teams to
run the program.
538
00:30:16,130 --> 00:30:18,050
My clients are experts at their
business.
539
00:30:18,090 --> 00:30:22,020
I'm expert at this.
Love that Julian response.
540
00:30:22,020 --> 00:30:26,100
I also spend more time talking
folks out of PPC2 than in two.
541
00:30:26,140 --> 00:30:28,620
I know it's the right thing to
do, but it registers as
542
00:30:28,620 --> 00:30:31,860
counterproductive to people who
saw themselves as a potential
543
00:30:31,860 --> 00:30:34,140
client.
Feels like a lose, lose.
544
00:30:34,140 --> 00:30:37,580
It's not a lose, lose, Gil
Gilner responds to Dan Patterson
545
00:30:37,580 --> 00:30:40,220
as well, saying landscape has
definitely changed in the past
546
00:30:40,220 --> 00:30:43,220
couple of years.
But most of our clients have in
547
00:30:43,220 --> 00:30:45,980
house marketing departments,
even if it's just two to three
548
00:30:45,980 --> 00:30:48,560
folks.
The answer is going up markets,
549
00:30:48,560 --> 00:30:52,040
small businesses, small business
clients are going to be able to
550
00:30:52,040 --> 00:30:54,480
do all this themselves soon very
well.
551
00:30:55,000 --> 00:30:58,960
And clients will only be hiring
as and when the budgets are big
552
00:30:58,960 --> 00:31:02,920
enough to justify some real life
eyeballs on the campaigns.
553
00:31:03,520 --> 00:31:06,000
Julie as well says, I think our
work has shifted.
554
00:31:06,000 --> 00:31:08,960
That is, we are not watching
bids like Hawks these days.
555
00:31:09,320 --> 00:31:12,960
But there's so much to do.
There's so much to do to have
556
00:31:12,960 --> 00:31:16,480
even the most automated of
campaigns running optimally.
557
00:31:16,760 --> 00:31:20,040
The machines are still kind of
dumb in a lot of areas that we
558
00:31:20,040 --> 00:31:23,040
are not.
The machines are a lot dumb in a
559
00:31:23,040 --> 00:31:26,720
lot of areas that we are not.
So yeah, our our role is not
560
00:31:26,720 --> 00:31:30,040
going away.
Nava Hopkins, as well as
561
00:31:30,040 --> 00:31:31,600
responsing.
If the only value you were
562
00:31:31,600 --> 00:31:34,160
providing was bid adjustment,
you were likely in trouble.
563
00:31:34,160 --> 00:31:37,200
Absolutely.
I I suspect that if you dig into
564
00:31:37,200 --> 00:31:41,010
how you enable folks to succeed,
you'll see that there was quite
565
00:31:41,050 --> 00:31:45,330
a bit more you're doing on the
technical or analytics side.
566
00:31:45,330 --> 00:31:49,090
Conversion, tracking, setup and
vetting, creative and message
567
00:31:49,090 --> 00:31:51,850
mapping, as well as overall
strategy by channel.
568
00:31:52,130 --> 00:31:55,650
I'd argue this is probably the
most useful time to be a PPC
569
00:31:55,650 --> 00:31:59,170
practitioner because most brands
can't keep up with all the
570
00:31:59,170 --> 00:32:03,320
changes being made.
For examples as well says yeah
571
00:32:03,320 --> 00:32:06,320
it's an interesting one.
I've seen our role change more
572
00:32:06,320 --> 00:32:10,160
into data interpreters and truly
understanding the platforms to
573
00:32:10,160 --> 00:32:13,840
turn the right cogs.
I still think many clients can
574
00:32:13,840 --> 00:32:17,840
just shove a load of keywords
into the platform and think it
575
00:32:17,840 --> 00:32:20,720
will make them rich.
The biggest thing for me is the
576
00:32:20,720 --> 00:32:23,440
role of Google reaching out to
clients directly.
577
00:32:24,320 --> 00:32:27,200
And if anybody's experienced
this experiencing this, I
578
00:32:27,200 --> 00:32:30,990
recommend checking out Boris's
and his latest threads about
579
00:32:30,990 --> 00:32:33,390
teleperformance.
Interesting.
580
00:32:33,910 --> 00:32:36,670
Reva Minkov says that yeah, I
was literally just having this
581
00:32:36,670 --> 00:32:40,510
semi existential conversation
with my team as to what's going
582
00:32:40,510 --> 00:32:44,310
to work with smaller budgets.
Now I don't always think it's
583
00:32:44,310 --> 00:32:47,950
more money that's the solution,
but the tactics for PPC are
584
00:32:47,950 --> 00:32:52,830
changing, especially on Google.
And yeah, Reva Minkov as well
585
00:32:52,830 --> 00:32:55,490
say I agreed that AI is less of
an issue.
586
00:32:55,490 --> 00:32:58,450
You still really, really need
someone who knows what they're
587
00:32:58,450 --> 00:33:01,930
doing to stare the ship.
Julie goes smaller budget
588
00:33:01,930 --> 00:33:05,530
accounts are in trouble.
Such ads are very much mature
589
00:33:05,530 --> 00:33:08,570
ecosystem now and that means
it's pricing out smaller
590
00:33:08,570 --> 00:33:11,970
advertisers, which is what Nava
was talking about, you know,
591
00:33:11,970 --> 00:33:15,290
talking about up thread with
helping clients determine if
592
00:33:15,290 --> 00:33:17,970
such ads are even for them
today.
593
00:33:18,250 --> 00:33:21,010
It's all about keeping our
integrity and if you're just
594
00:33:21,010 --> 00:33:24,340
going to take someone's money,
take someone's budget and not
595
00:33:24,340 --> 00:33:27,540
actually deliver with them, you
shouldn't be in this industry.
596
00:33:27,820 --> 00:33:30,540
That's my opinion.
Fred Andrews response saying
597
00:33:30,580 --> 00:33:33,300
also super passionate about
spend efficiency.
598
00:33:33,300 --> 00:33:37,460
It's our job to fight back and
in will Reynolds words stop
599
00:33:37,460 --> 00:33:39,820
Google taking more of our
clients money right.
600
00:33:40,340 --> 00:33:42,180
That's what SC is also trying to
do as well.
601
00:33:42,420 --> 00:33:44,420
So that's why I love them Riva
as well.
602
00:33:44,420 --> 00:33:47,500
See I agreed that PPC isn't the
right answer for everyone but
603
00:33:47,500 --> 00:33:51,180
what are you using as your other
options these days feel feel
604
00:33:51,180 --> 00:33:55,330
like the new Serps, SEO's
especially is less effective
605
00:33:55,330 --> 00:33:59,410
than it was as is a good chunk
of organic social.
606
00:34:00,250 --> 00:34:03,130
And Julie says as let's not
forget the influence we had can
607
00:34:03,130 --> 00:34:06,530
have in the post click part of
the equation 2 right.
608
00:34:06,770 --> 00:34:10,330
Historically I know many have
been pretty hands off but I
609
00:34:10,330 --> 00:34:15,050
think that is a smart place to
build skills right now.
610
00:34:15,690 --> 00:34:20,250
And then we go on to question
five, our last question for very
611
00:34:20,330 --> 00:34:23,900
detailed and the most
interactive chat.
612
00:34:23,900 --> 00:34:26,739
I don't think there have been
this many answers that I've been
613
00:34:26,739 --> 00:34:29,260
given by this many people on any
of our Twitter chats.
614
00:34:29,340 --> 00:34:32,219
Honestly, I don't know, maybe
just people don't sometimes find
615
00:34:32,219 --> 00:34:34,260
the questions which I found is
the case.
616
00:34:34,260 --> 00:34:38,460
But this has been a very
detailed chat and probably one
617
00:34:38,460 --> 00:34:40,500
of the most that I've found over
Twitter.
618
00:34:40,500 --> 00:34:43,739
So yeah, be prepared, they're
like over 30 replies to this.
619
00:34:43,739 --> 00:34:47,139
But it'll be a summary to this
question I'll be giving, So not
620
00:34:47,219 --> 00:34:51,739
every response I'll read out.
So our last question of this
621
00:34:51,739 --> 00:34:56,260
chat is, do you have a business
of PPC questions vexing you
622
00:34:56,260 --> 00:34:59,500
right now?
Maybe we can help now the whole
623
00:34:59,500 --> 00:35:01,180
concerns.
I want to help everyone and I
624
00:35:01,180 --> 00:35:04,220
know I can't and that makes me
sad, you know, right.
625
00:35:04,810 --> 00:35:06,890
Julia Vice goes yes with one
particular client.
626
00:35:06,890 --> 00:35:08,610
I don't think y'all can help
with that.
627
00:35:08,610 --> 00:35:12,290
But I appreciate, I appreciate
chairs and well wishes are big
628
00:35:12,290 --> 00:35:15,850
chairs to you Julia And then
Julie goes, yeah, I want to help
629
00:35:15,890 --> 00:35:18,530
all the small businesses to in
response to Nava Hopkins
630
00:35:18,570 --> 00:35:22,090
especially don't want them to
get scammed or waste money on
631
00:35:22,090 --> 00:35:26,810
things that won't bring sales.
And I think that is a big thing
632
00:35:26,810 --> 00:35:29,970
for why paid search market is
with integrity.
633
00:35:30,450 --> 00:35:34,460
We'll still be able to find a
job, will still have clients,
634
00:35:34,460 --> 00:35:36,980
you know, we need to stay in
this industry for the sake of
635
00:35:36,980 --> 00:35:40,620
the clients who might be getting
scammed and duped by the ones
636
00:35:40,620 --> 00:35:43,500
that have no integrity.
So yeah, if you're one of those,
637
00:35:43,620 --> 00:35:48,100
keep in it, keep fighting for
telling how business this Our
638
00:35:48,100 --> 00:35:51,340
paid search should be done well.
Our businesses should be doing
639
00:35:51,580 --> 00:35:55,580
paid search well and not just
doing any kind of paid search.
640
00:35:56,440 --> 00:35:59,240
Travis goes what vexes means the
poor association with price
641
00:35:59,240 --> 00:36:02,200
versus value among businesses.
No one disagrees with the price
642
00:36:02,200 --> 00:36:05,640
of an apple.
It's $1.50 per pound and we pay
643
00:36:05,640 --> 00:36:09,040
that, no questions asked.
When mechanic says it costs X
644
00:36:09,040 --> 00:36:11,920
for the part, Y for the labor,
we pay the invoice.
645
00:36:12,160 --> 00:36:14,880
When it comes to online
services, people are far less
646
00:36:14,880 --> 00:36:17,360
seasoned.
Clients come to the table
647
00:36:17,360 --> 00:36:20,400
feeling like it's a negotiation,
and I don't yet have a complete
648
00:36:20,400 --> 00:36:22,680
solution for that.
Yeah.
649
00:36:22,680 --> 00:36:25,400
And so Gil asks, how do you
charge a flat rate?
650
00:36:26,130 --> 00:36:29,130
Go Travis goes.
I fully scope out services at an
651
00:36:29,170 --> 00:36:33,290
hourly rate and 50% upfront, the
rest spread evenly over the
652
00:36:33,290 --> 00:36:37,090
duration of work.
I try to be as blatantly
653
00:36:37,090 --> 00:36:41,370
transparent as possible.
Go says Ali, is a very difficult
654
00:36:41,370 --> 00:36:45,050
model unless you're a holder and
then never goes.
655
00:36:45,090 --> 00:36:46,810
Actually, maybe you all can help
me.
656
00:36:46,810 --> 00:36:50,490
I have some consulting clients
who use another PPC vendor to
657
00:36:50,490 --> 00:36:53,850
manage their accounts and they
do so many bad things.
658
00:36:54,430 --> 00:36:57,790
Don't let my clients own their
GA four and add accounts.
659
00:36:57,790 --> 00:37:00,470
No negative.
Almost all broad search with
660
00:37:00,470 --> 00:37:03,550
display select.
How do I help my client?
661
00:37:03,550 --> 00:37:06,190
They know they could fire the
agency but they don't.
662
00:37:06,550 --> 00:37:11,030
Also the agency manages the SEOI
was gobsmacked at how much My
663
00:37:11,030 --> 00:37:15,550
client pays them 18% management
fee to do Essentially nothing.
664
00:37:16,310 --> 00:37:18,430
Michelle responds.
I was wondering how often people
665
00:37:18,430 --> 00:37:20,470
renegotiate contracts with
clients.
666
00:37:20,470 --> 00:37:24,200
I have several clients who have
grown pretty significantly under
667
00:37:24,200 --> 00:37:29,920
my watch, like 5 to 20% X ad
spend return, et cetera.
668
00:37:29,920 --> 00:37:33,240
And the work is a lot more, my
responsibilities are greater, et
669
00:37:33,240 --> 00:37:35,200
cetera.
And I want to start having
670
00:37:35,200 --> 00:37:38,880
contract renegotiations built
into my process.
671
00:37:39,040 --> 00:37:41,960
How do others approach this?
I know we've talked about this
672
00:37:41,960 --> 00:37:46,390
and I think a good answer I
heard was review things on a
673
00:37:46,390 --> 00:37:49,870
yearly basis and let the clients
know that you plan that at at
674
00:37:49,870 --> 00:37:52,510
certain points of the year you
review the contractor, you
675
00:37:52,510 --> 00:37:56,710
review the work and increases in
price can happen.
676
00:37:56,710 --> 00:37:59,750
I think we did a whole
discussion about how you charge
677
00:37:59,750 --> 00:38:03,870
when you charge, how you, you
know, ensure clients know that
678
00:38:04,230 --> 00:38:06,830
the more work that you do the
more you need to charge them.
679
00:38:06,830 --> 00:38:10,580
That really needs to be part of
the contract or sow's.
680
00:38:10,580 --> 00:38:13,700
No, not sow, but the contract as
well, the Ogilner responds
681
00:38:13,700 --> 00:38:17,180
saying that we went 100% flat
rate retainer model tiered based
682
00:38:17,180 --> 00:38:19,340
on ad spend.
It's much easier and lets us
683
00:38:19,340 --> 00:38:23,700
build totally upfront phrase
Andrews goes ideas around how to
684
00:38:23,700 --> 00:38:26,740
approach completely cold clients
are always welcome.
685
00:38:27,420 --> 00:38:29,620
Build relationships.
That's my my advice.
686
00:38:29,620 --> 00:38:31,780
Build relationship, Build
people.
687
00:38:31,780 --> 00:38:34,180
Who will be your biggest
cheerleaders who would really
688
00:38:34,180 --> 00:38:37,410
want to work not just with the
company, but with their the
689
00:38:37,410 --> 00:38:40,890
account managers, the account
contact, so that even when they
690
00:38:40,890 --> 00:38:45,450
move on and leave a brand,
they're still singing your
691
00:38:45,450 --> 00:38:48,770
praise in their new job.
Julie responds, saying there is
692
00:38:48,770 --> 00:38:51,970
an annoyingly persistent
perception that things on or
693
00:38:51,970 --> 00:38:53,850
related to the Internet should
be cheap.
694
00:38:53,850 --> 00:38:56,170
I think the best way I have
found to handle this is by
695
00:38:56,170 --> 00:38:59,470
saying I am not the least
expensive provider out there.
696
00:38:59,670 --> 00:39:02,390
If that is your number one
priority and probably not the
697
00:39:02,390 --> 00:39:05,630
consultant for you.
Because if they don't inherently
698
00:39:05,630 --> 00:39:09,550
see or understand the value in
what I bring to the table, they
699
00:39:09,550 --> 00:39:12,110
will never be satisfied And who
needs that in their life?
700
00:39:12,150 --> 00:39:14,870
Absolutely.
Now Hopkins responsing consider
701
00:39:14,870 --> 00:39:18,990
letting them know that you have
them on a League legacy plan and
702
00:39:18,990 --> 00:39:23,190
you want to keep working with
them but need to move them into
703
00:39:23,190 --> 00:39:24,830
a different plan.
And that's what that's in
704
00:39:24,830 --> 00:39:28,630
response to Michelle talking
about how work has increased.
705
00:39:28,630 --> 00:39:30,550
She has really improved the
accounts.
706
00:39:30,790 --> 00:39:33,190
How does she charge more then
continuing?
707
00:39:33,190 --> 00:39:35,750
Nava goes however, as a thank
you for their loyalty.
708
00:39:35,750 --> 00:39:38,790
You'll discount the new plan
even if it's an upsell on where
709
00:39:38,950 --> 00:39:42,190
they are now.
Julie responds saying a response
710
00:39:42,190 --> 00:39:45,350
to Nava saying I think all you
can do in that scenario in terms
711
00:39:45,390 --> 00:39:49,600
of she has this clients, that or
possible client.
712
00:39:49,600 --> 00:39:54,200
It sounds like they have a paid
search agency doing bad PPC for
713
00:39:54,200 --> 00:39:55,880
them.
Just let's just call it bad.
714
00:39:55,960 --> 00:39:59,280
All the best practices are being
ignored and they're doing little
715
00:39:59,280 --> 00:40:04,440
to nothing for 18% of management
fee, Julie continues.
716
00:40:04,440 --> 00:40:07,160
I think all you can do in that
scenario is tactfully point out
717
00:40:07,200 --> 00:40:09,480
the issues whenever they are
relevant to what you're
718
00:40:09,480 --> 00:40:12,800
discussing with them.
You can lead a host to water,
719
00:40:12,800 --> 00:40:15,000
dot dot dot or you can't force
them to drink.
720
00:40:15,910 --> 00:40:18,630
Julia Vice response to Michelle
saying that I'd like to review
721
00:40:18,630 --> 00:40:20,550
regularly.
Doesn't need to be each year
722
00:40:20,550 --> 00:40:23,710
just a good cadence and share
new platforms, complexity,
723
00:40:23,710 --> 00:40:27,070
changes, hours needed to do new
talks, tasks.
724
00:40:27,110 --> 00:40:29,750
It can be very positive.
It can be a very positive
725
00:40:29,950 --> 00:40:32,830
conversation and if you show
them they might be the ones
726
00:40:32,830 --> 00:40:36,510
going oh wow, you've not
increased our spend.
727
00:40:36,910 --> 00:40:39,430
And I actually think by the fact
that you've not done it
728
00:40:39,430 --> 00:40:43,340
immediately should be a way to
encourage them to, you know,
729
00:40:43,340 --> 00:40:46,660
sign on that new contract, just
show them for like, hey, for X
730
00:40:46,660 --> 00:40:48,940
amount of months.
I've actually done be doing a
731
00:40:48,940 --> 00:40:52,780
lot more than when I started
writing when when we when we
732
00:40:52,860 --> 00:40:56,300
first signed this contract.
Based on that we're going to
733
00:40:56,300 --> 00:40:58,060
increase it.
And because I'm already giving
734
00:40:58,060 --> 00:41:01,740
you a discount, sign this new
contract quickly and I think
735
00:41:01,740 --> 00:41:04,220
people will understand that
people know that you need to get
736
00:41:04,220 --> 00:41:06,380
paid for the job you do, don't
they?
737
00:41:07,100 --> 00:41:08,210
They do, right?
Right.
738
00:41:08,650 --> 00:41:11,490
Anyway, Julia, Vice responds.
What is your role in this?
739
00:41:11,490 --> 00:41:14,090
Do you do they see you as a PPC
expert?
740
00:41:14,530 --> 00:41:15,770
Never.
Hawkins goes, yeah.
741
00:41:15,970 --> 00:41:19,450
Kirk put this in a great way.
Our E hourly rate, and that's
742
00:41:19,450 --> 00:41:22,450
the person who does hourly In
response to the person who does
743
00:41:22,490 --> 00:41:26,130
hourly, you're not paying for
how much time it takes.
744
00:41:26,450 --> 00:41:28,730
Me.
You're paying for how well I can
745
00:41:28,730 --> 00:41:30,250
get it done as quickly as
possible.
746
00:41:30,730 --> 00:41:33,450
If I get it done quicker, I
should get to get paid more, not
747
00:41:33,450 --> 00:41:36,050
less time, not less.
So that's why hourly is very
748
00:41:36,050 --> 00:41:38,810
dangerous.
Travis goes, yeah, perhaps you
749
00:41:38,810 --> 00:41:41,570
expose them to how much freedom
you offer.
750
00:41:42,490 --> 00:41:46,210
With me, you own 100% of what
you should GA four is yours as
751
00:41:46,210 --> 00:41:50,210
your work product your own.
Here's a third party source or
752
00:41:50,210 --> 00:41:53,530
article that validates what I'm
saying so you can hear it
753
00:41:53,530 --> 00:41:56,450
elsewhere.
I want to extend that freedom to
754
00:41:56,610 --> 00:41:59,650
the business.
So yeah, in terms of nervous
755
00:41:59,690 --> 00:42:02,520
issue with her very problematic
client?
756
00:42:02,960 --> 00:42:05,480
Never response saying yes.
They hired me specifically to
757
00:42:05,480 --> 00:42:07,280
help them challenge their
vendors.
758
00:42:08,000 --> 00:42:10,640
Gogonas responsing my single
most important tip?
759
00:42:10,640 --> 00:42:12,840
Charge more.
The more you charge, the less
760
00:42:12,840 --> 00:42:16,840
fuss anyone has about the price.
PPC experts are rarer than
761
00:42:16,840 --> 00:42:19,240
you'll think, right?
Right.
762
00:42:19,280 --> 00:42:20,680
I should get back into
freelancing.
763
00:42:21,000 --> 00:42:23,080
Don't tell anyone now the
Hopkins goes.
764
00:42:23,080 --> 00:42:26,520
To be clear, I don't want to
take the business away from the
765
00:42:26,520 --> 00:42:29,440
vendor.
If anything, I want them to pay
766
00:42:29,640 --> 00:42:32,480
their team more and grow their
current staff.
767
00:42:33,000 --> 00:42:36,160
Julie Vice goes, aha, then roll
up your sleeves, build out a
768
00:42:36,160 --> 00:42:39,680
strategy with specifics on what
could be done differently, and
769
00:42:39,680 --> 00:42:43,400
show what the spend could
potentially get on the different
770
00:42:43,400 --> 00:42:46,480
management.
Then let them decide.
771
00:42:47,200 --> 00:42:51,080
And yeah, Julie goes built it,
built it, build it into having a
772
00:42:51,080 --> 00:42:52,720
yearly conversation with ongoing
clients.
773
00:42:52,720 --> 00:42:55,560
And that's a response to
Michelle about the scope of what
774
00:42:55,560 --> 00:42:58,200
you're doing for them.
You can even position it along
775
00:42:58,200 --> 00:43:01,480
the lines of let's make sure we
have this set up in the most
776
00:43:01,480 --> 00:43:05,320
efficient way possible.
And then Julia Vice goes, yeah,
777
00:43:05,720 --> 00:43:07,920
something's not connecting for
me.
778
00:43:07,920 --> 00:43:11,440
In response to Nava, the work is
below par in terms of quality.
779
00:43:11,440 --> 00:43:14,360
So they want more dollars in
order to do better.
780
00:43:14,770 --> 00:43:17,450
I'd get that vendor to make
serious commitments in that
781
00:43:17,610 --> 00:43:21,330
issue, in that situation.
And yeah, and response.
782
00:43:21,330 --> 00:43:25,570
So about Michelle's issue in
regards into making more money
783
00:43:25,570 --> 00:43:29,490
with more work, we sometimes do
climate meetings to ensure we're
784
00:43:29,490 --> 00:43:34,570
on track, communicating well and
to create room to change or grow
785
00:43:34,650 --> 00:43:38,250
the relationship where needed.
And yeah, Michelle goes, I love
786
00:43:38,250 --> 00:43:41,530
this idea because I also want
better feedback from my kind on
787
00:43:41,530 --> 00:43:46,020
how the partnership is going and
when Brown responds here in
788
00:43:46,020 --> 00:43:49,900
terms of what Travis was saying
about like about hourly rates,
789
00:43:49,900 --> 00:43:52,020
interesting take on hours.
I like your thinking.
790
00:43:52,020 --> 00:43:55,660
We took on one hourly brand last
year as they really wanted to
791
00:43:55,660 --> 00:43:58,660
work with us.
I just had to charge a high rate
792
00:43:58,660 --> 00:44:02,700
to make it worthwhile for the
work, which was 30% or higher
793
00:44:02,700 --> 00:44:05,620
than the two closest competitors
pitching.
794
00:44:05,860 --> 00:44:10,460
I still don't love hours, but
you got to charge for it, as you
795
00:44:10,460 --> 00:44:12,750
said.
And then Julie goes, yeah, the
796
00:44:12,750 --> 00:44:16,950
bottom line on in how you price
and position things in your
797
00:44:16,950 --> 00:44:20,230
agreements really comes down to
how well it works for you and
798
00:44:20,230 --> 00:44:23,750
your situation too.
As with everything PPC, there
799
00:44:23,750 --> 00:44:26,110
really is not just one way to do
anything.
800
00:44:26,470 --> 00:44:29,510
And when Brown also says if you
are making money and are
801
00:44:29,510 --> 00:44:34,510
profiting with how this year is
going, you are doing a good job,
802
00:44:34,630 --> 00:44:38,750
I say so Lately, if you're if
you're going by your principles,
803
00:44:38,750 --> 00:44:40,750
you're doing things with
integrity, you're making the
804
00:44:40,750 --> 00:44:44,470
money, you're making sure you're
increasing your rate according
805
00:44:44,470 --> 00:44:48,190
to the work that you're doing.
You're doing well.
806
00:44:48,190 --> 00:44:50,950
So guys, stop being stressful
with each other, with
807
00:44:50,950 --> 00:44:53,990
yourselves, even if you're not.
You're getting it's slow on
808
00:44:53,990 --> 00:44:58,350
clients and getting your clients
be be easier to yourself, be
809
00:44:58,350 --> 00:44:59,950
kind to yourself.
That's something I need to
810
00:44:59,950 --> 00:45:02,310
remind myself.
And on that note, we come to the
811
00:45:02,310 --> 00:45:05,980
end of this long chat.
That was definitely a summary.
812
00:45:05,980 --> 00:45:09,780
I didn't read all the responses
and look at how much we got
813
00:45:09,780 --> 00:45:12,220
through, so let's quickly wrap
up.
814
00:45:12,220 --> 00:45:13,900
I hope you've taken some great
takeaways.
815
00:45:13,900 --> 00:45:18,340
I imagine there's going to be a
voice conversation about this
816
00:45:18,340 --> 00:45:21,260
topic on Thursday, 5:00 PM G and
5:00 PM BST.
817
00:45:21,260 --> 00:45:24,540
So we're in British summertime,
but at 12:00 PM Eastern Time on
818
00:45:24,540 --> 00:45:28,860
Discord on our Discord channel.
So look out for the PPC chat
819
00:45:29,140 --> 00:45:32,620
group on Discord to join the
voice chat.
820
00:45:33,170 --> 00:45:36,130
Before any feedback about the
podcast or even some correction
821
00:45:36,130 --> 00:45:38,730
and anything I've said, get in
touch with me on Twitter, on
822
00:45:38,730 --> 00:45:43,170
threads, on my handle at the
Marketing Annual, or just follow
823
00:45:43,170 --> 00:45:45,130
me on LinkedIn and let me know
what you think.
824
00:45:45,610 --> 00:45:48,170
It'd be great for longstanding
and brand new listeners to give
825
00:45:48,170 --> 00:45:50,690
the podcast a review.
It really helps with the growth
826
00:45:50,970 --> 00:45:54,810
strategy of the podcast, and you
can do that on Spotify and Apple
827
00:45:55,010 --> 00:45:59,130
wherever.
Just go to linktree.com/P PC
828
00:45:59,130 --> 00:46:02,950
chat under score roundup to get
get to do that.
829
00:46:02,950 --> 00:46:06,230
It'll take seconds.
And finally, before I go, by the
830
00:46:06,230 --> 00:46:08,990
time you'll be listening to
this, PPC Live UK will be
831
00:46:08,990 --> 00:46:14,070
happening tomorrow on Thursday,
the 27th of July.
832
00:46:14,070 --> 00:46:15,590
Are we in July?
Yes, we're in July.
833
00:46:16,070 --> 00:46:20,230
You believe it, 27th of July.
We've got 3 speakers, we've got
834
00:46:20,230 --> 00:46:23,430
red velvet cake, we've got
drinks that I've already ordered
835
00:46:23,750 --> 00:46:27,390
yesterday and food that's going
to be ordered on the day so that
836
00:46:27,390 --> 00:46:30,650
they're fresh and hot for the
audience members.
837
00:46:30,650 --> 00:46:32,690
There's so many more tickets to
be sold.
838
00:46:32,690 --> 00:46:36,250
Go to PPC live U k.com.
There's a button right to the
839
00:46:36,250 --> 00:46:39,570
top saying buy tickets.
So go and buy your tickets is
840
00:46:39,570 --> 00:46:43,050
going to be a fun one year
anniversary celebration and I'm
841
00:46:43,050 --> 00:46:47,610
so proud, must say so proud.
Finally remember for your
842
00:46:47,610 --> 00:46:49,850
campaigns and businesses to
glide smoothly.
843
00:46:49,850 --> 00:46:52,370
There's a lot of hard work
needed beneath the surface, so
844
00:46:52,650 --> 00:46:54,930
keep your Swans kicking by and
speak to you next week.
00:00:00,680 --> 00:00:03,880
Hello and welcome to this week's
episode of the PPC chat roundup.
2
00:00:03,920 --> 00:00:07,600
In today's episode, we have the
amazing Julie Bichini leading us
3
00:00:07,600 --> 00:00:11,400
again on a topic of the business
of PPC.
4
00:00:11,680 --> 00:00:15,280
So this is where we answer
questions around what's it like
5
00:00:15,280 --> 00:00:18,520
working in PPC, how long we've
been doing there, how do we do
6
00:00:18,520 --> 00:00:22,240
contracts and agreements, what
do we find challenging talking
7
00:00:22,240 --> 00:00:25,480
about with clients, dealing with
clients, you know any of our
8
00:00:25,480 --> 00:00:27,400
business questions and and so
forth.
9
00:00:27,400 --> 00:00:29,680
So we've got five questions that
we go through today.
10
00:00:30,010 --> 00:00:32,930
And yeah, it's an interesting
chat from people who have been
11
00:00:33,010 --> 00:00:35,970
in this industry for a long
time, including myself.
12
00:00:35,970 --> 00:00:39,610
I can't believe it's been as
long as I've been in it.
13
00:00:39,610 --> 00:00:42,570
So yeah, I would give it away.
You're going to have to listen
14
00:00:42,610 --> 00:00:46,170
after the the intro to to hear
how long we've been in this
15
00:00:46,170 --> 00:00:50,050
industry, Is there many, many
veterans in this industry who
16
00:00:50,050 --> 00:00:54,450
give their advice on how to keep
going on in this industry, how
17
00:00:54,450 --> 00:00:57,930
to have longevity in this
industry.
18
00:00:57,930 --> 00:01:00,740
So yeah, I hope you listen and
join Lun.
19
00:01:00,860 --> 00:01:12,340
All right.
Hello and a warm welcome to this
20
00:01:12,340 --> 00:01:15,820
week's episode of the PPC Chat
Roundup, a podcast where I round
21
00:01:15,820 --> 00:01:19,510
up the usually Twitter
discussion that happens on
22
00:01:19,510 --> 00:01:22,950
Tuesdays at 5:00 PM GMT.
I'm your host Anu and I'm
23
00:01:22,950 --> 00:01:25,630
recording from my studio here in
London, UK and I use this
24
00:01:25,630 --> 00:01:28,830
platform to share not just
expert but also my ideas and
25
00:01:28,830 --> 00:01:31,990
considered best practices about
paid media and the direction the
26
00:01:31,990 --> 00:01:34,870
digital industry is going in.
So if you wanna keep up to date
27
00:01:34,870 --> 00:01:37,630
with my tips and tricks in the
industry and get the latest on
28
00:01:37,630 --> 00:01:39,830
the podcast that has been called
your go to.
29
00:01:40,420 --> 00:01:43,460
If you don't make it to the PPC
chat, live discussions and even
30
00:01:43,460 --> 00:01:47,740
if you do then like follow,
share and retweet or reshare or
31
00:01:47,740 --> 00:01:51,500
repost on Twitter and threads
with my handle the marketing
32
00:01:51,580 --> 00:01:53,900
annu.
Or join us on our LinkedIn group
33
00:01:53,900 --> 00:01:57,940
which is the PPC chat roundup.
Or if you're on Instagram, you
34
00:01:57,940 --> 00:02:01,540
can check us out at PPC chat on
this call roundup to get quotes
35
00:02:01,740 --> 00:02:03,740
and snippets from our previous
episodes.
36
00:02:04,140 --> 00:02:07,660
So, yeah, we have Julie taken us
on a great topic of the business
37
00:02:07,660 --> 00:02:12,440
of PPC and you might have gotten
a few clues from my intro, from
38
00:02:12,440 --> 00:02:17,440
some stuff that I what I've just
said here right after the intro
39
00:02:17,440 --> 00:02:22,560
music as to the the the feelings
that we're having towards
40
00:02:22,560 --> 00:02:26,840
Twitter at the moment.
So you know I said usually the
41
00:02:26,840 --> 00:02:29,440
Twitter discussion, why that
specifically?
42
00:02:29,440 --> 00:02:31,320
Because today we had the
discussion on Slack.
43
00:02:31,640 --> 00:02:35,240
So yeah, we we tested that out.
It was amazing, You know, the
44
00:02:35,320 --> 00:02:38,570
all the questions were written
out and all the answers were put
45
00:02:38,570 --> 00:02:41,330
in threads of that question.
So I think that was a great
46
00:02:41,330 --> 00:02:44,250
method of doing it.
And yes, I'm on threads because
47
00:02:44,250 --> 00:02:47,890
Twitter is becoming a bit of a
bum site.
48
00:02:48,250 --> 00:02:50,090
I feel it's just getting all
crazy.
49
00:02:50,090 --> 00:02:54,690
There was a new branding.
It's not a cold X, not even sure
50
00:02:55,290 --> 00:02:57,770
my brain cannot even get my head
around that.
51
00:02:58,090 --> 00:03:02,090
So you'll probably be hearing
more about my podcast episode on
52
00:03:02,090 --> 00:03:05,050
threads on Twitter.
A little bit on Twitter, if they
53
00:03:05,700 --> 00:03:09,660
they still allow it for as much
as the for as long as the PPC
54
00:03:09,660 --> 00:03:14,340
community is still on there, on
LinkedIn as usual for my podcast
55
00:03:14,340 --> 00:03:18,100
Friday post and as well
elsewhere on Instagram as I
56
00:03:18,100 --> 00:03:21,180
mentioned on there as well.
We're also on Facebook, so check
57
00:03:21,180 --> 00:03:24,120
us out on there.
So yeah, enough of the rambling.
58
00:03:24,120 --> 00:03:28,280
Let's see how this Slack
conversation went before we
59
00:03:28,520 --> 00:03:31,240
Julie goes into the questions
she reads out saying that, yeah,
60
00:03:31,240 --> 00:03:34,800
this chat is intended for PPC
professionals of all levels, and
61
00:03:34,800 --> 00:03:37,040
if you have something you want
to share, please do.
62
00:03:37,240 --> 00:03:39,520
We are a friendly and supportive
community.
63
00:03:39,720 --> 00:03:42,200
Please don't be afraid to
participate.
64
00:03:42,200 --> 00:03:47,000
So even though we've got about
457 people in this Slack channel
65
00:03:47,000 --> 00:03:51,160
specifically, it's only like a
handful of of people that do
66
00:03:51,450 --> 00:03:54,330
join the chat.
And we we're welcoming everybody
67
00:03:54,330 --> 00:03:57,410
that just wants to lurk around
or people who just want to
68
00:03:57,410 --> 00:03:59,730
listen to the podcast.
You are very, very welcome.
69
00:03:59,730 --> 00:04:04,690
And thank you for listening to
another episode as we journey
70
00:04:04,970 --> 00:04:07,290
into this new world of Slack
chat.
71
00:04:07,610 --> 00:04:10,970
Slack chat, could that be a new
phrase instead of Twitter chat
72
00:04:10,970 --> 00:04:13,090
is a Slack chat.
Let's get into our questions.
73
00:04:13,090 --> 00:04:16,810
So question 1, Julie asks how
long have you been working in
74
00:04:16,810 --> 00:04:20,250
PPC and are you or have you been
agency in House of consultant
75
00:04:20,760 --> 00:04:23,880
freelancer?
Julia Vice herself says 15 years
76
00:04:24,160 --> 00:04:28,520
agency life is the PPC person.
So yeah, agency life as the PPC
77
00:04:28,520 --> 00:04:31,320
person for her.
I've also been close to 15 years
78
00:04:31,320 --> 00:04:33,160
now.
I've done all of the above.
79
00:04:33,160 --> 00:04:39,560
So I have been in house agency
tech company now freelancer.
80
00:04:40,180 --> 00:04:43,820
I've done it all I feel Julie
goes I've been working in PPC
81
00:04:43,820 --> 00:04:47,300
since literally the beginning
and I'm a consultant and always
82
00:04:47,300 --> 00:04:49,900
have been.
Melissa McKee goes, yeah I'm
83
00:04:49,900 --> 00:04:53,220
doing it with a 121 years since
2002.
84
00:04:53,220 --> 00:04:55,540
I started in inhouse and did
that for five years.
85
00:04:55,780 --> 00:04:58,220
Fraser Andrews goes been working
in PPC for eight years
86
00:04:58,220 --> 00:05:01,660
predominantly agency side.
I did have a brief stint in
87
00:05:01,660 --> 00:05:05,100
higher education marketing for
UK Uni, but discovered it
88
00:05:05,100 --> 00:05:08,370
definitely wasn't for me,
Michelle Yeager says.
89
00:05:08,370 --> 00:05:12,570
Technically eight years OMG,
first three at Google as an
90
00:05:12,570 --> 00:05:15,610
account manager and then past
five as a solar consultant.
91
00:05:15,610 --> 00:05:18,490
I attempted a few other things
on the side.
92
00:05:18,490 --> 00:05:21,970
Wine making grad school
interesting and this has been
93
00:05:21,970 --> 00:05:24,450
the bulk of my income for the
past five years.
94
00:05:24,890 --> 00:05:27,490
Gil Gilner goes, yeah, marketing
since 2008.
95
00:05:27,490 --> 00:05:30,570
PPC specifically.
Only since 2016 I was inhouse
96
00:05:30,570 --> 00:05:34,570
director of special projects a
KA marketing Jack of all trades.
97
00:05:34,970 --> 00:05:37,970
Travis Bare shell responds
saying, yeah, I've been in PPC
98
00:05:37,970 --> 00:05:41,810
for about 10 years, mostly
agency side and consulting for
99
00:05:41,810 --> 00:05:45,170
the past five years.
Started across all digital
100
00:05:45,170 --> 00:05:48,730
channels, social search,
display, video, audio and now
101
00:05:48,730 --> 00:05:51,730
specialized predominantly in
SEM&SCEO.
102
00:05:52,130 --> 00:05:55,930
Dave Gallegos goes there.
I'm in the 20 plus camp PBC
103
00:05:55,930 --> 00:06:00,290
affiliate to start later agency
and in house Dan Patterson goes
104
00:06:00,290 --> 00:06:04,670
I started an SEO then in 2010
moved in house and took over PPC
105
00:06:04,670 --> 00:06:08,230
display and affiliates as well.
And yeah Ashton Cargo's been in
106
00:06:08,230 --> 00:06:11,870
the agency and consulting life
for five years not always PPC.
107
00:06:12,510 --> 00:06:15,430
And yeah Julie then answers Dan
Patterson who mentioned his
108
00:06:15,430 --> 00:06:18,510
stint with starting with SEO.
Julie goes I did SEO back in the
109
00:06:18,510 --> 00:06:21,350
beginning to you know when you
could make a decent title tag
110
00:06:21,350 --> 00:06:25,910
and get on page one of Google.
Julie goes as well same.
111
00:06:26,150 --> 00:06:30,330
So Julia Vice even saying SEO
writer to PPC Dan Patterson's
112
00:06:30,330 --> 00:06:33,370
gag goes Back in the good old
days I set up a stupid little
113
00:06:33,370 --> 00:06:37,010
WordPress site and was beating
out major banks for sometimes
114
00:06:37,010 --> 00:06:39,330
nice one.
Fraze Andrews goes.
115
00:06:39,330 --> 00:06:43,210
Yeah I did six months of PPC and
SEO work in my first agency and
116
00:06:43,210 --> 00:06:46,210
I cannot stress enough how
beneficial even having the
117
00:06:46,210 --> 00:06:48,170
smallest level of SEO knowledge
has helped.
118
00:06:48,570 --> 00:06:51,090
I don't think I ever really
bought into the whole SEO versus
119
00:06:51,090 --> 00:06:53,930
PPC thing.
I am so glad to hear that and
120
00:06:53,930 --> 00:06:58,830
even I did a chat with Viaduct
Jen earlier on today about our
121
00:06:58,830 --> 00:07:01,790
SEO and PPC can work well
together and the benefits of
122
00:07:01,790 --> 00:07:04,830
both and Fraser Goes are we all
SEO converts.
123
00:07:04,990 --> 00:07:09,510
Melissa goes not me being in PPC
from the beginning and Gil
124
00:07:09,510 --> 00:07:12,110
Gilner says I did almost
exclusively SEO for the first
125
00:07:12,110 --> 00:07:14,870
few years as well.
I also did SEO in the first
126
00:07:14,870 --> 00:07:18,270
first few months of my career,
but it was more linked building
127
00:07:18,670 --> 00:07:21,150
and it was very boring and
salesy.
128
00:07:21,150 --> 00:07:25,110
So I got out of there quick and
glad that I landed in PPC.
129
00:07:25,110 --> 00:07:27,550
Fraser Andrews goes, I couldn't
call myself a convert.
130
00:07:27,550 --> 00:07:31,520
I literally fell into a CEO but
was always interested in PPC
131
00:07:31,520 --> 00:07:35,360
because of the data.
Yeah and Dave Semperon says I'm
132
00:07:35,360 --> 00:07:38,600
I I just joined the channel.
I've been doing PPC for 14 years
133
00:07:38,880 --> 00:07:41,280
River goes.
I've been in PPC for over 15
134
00:07:41,280 --> 00:07:43,280
years now and have been all of
the above.
135
00:07:43,320 --> 00:07:47,280
Agency inhouse consultancy
freelance big little like me
136
00:07:47,640 --> 00:07:50,520
Dave Gallegos goes random ad I
hate when people hate on
137
00:07:50,520 --> 00:07:53,640
domainers.
I feel like they are cure people
138
00:07:53,640 --> 00:07:58,920
too like Seo's and PPCRS.
That's interesting, the tertiary
139
00:07:58,920 --> 00:08:00,280
goes.
I've been in marketing since
140
00:08:00,280 --> 00:08:03,320
2019, so quite young.
I was a freelancer before, a
141
00:08:03,320 --> 00:08:07,360
full stock developer, automation
developer for funnel marketing.
142
00:08:07,360 --> 00:08:09,720
I did that for seven years
before I go into PPC.
143
00:08:10,320 --> 00:08:13,240
Now the Hopkins goes 15 years
and I've done it all in house.
144
00:08:13,240 --> 00:08:15,960
Software agency.
I'm a SAS girl at heart, but I
145
00:08:15,960 --> 00:08:18,720
value my other experiences as
well.
146
00:08:18,720 --> 00:08:22,280
Jillian Phillips as well.
I've been in PPC for five years
147
00:08:22,280 --> 00:08:24,880
doing Brown.
I've been in PPC since for 17
148
00:08:24,880 --> 00:08:28,970
years since I got started.
Been 17 years even since I got
149
00:08:28,970 --> 00:08:31,930
started the last seven years.
Running an agency.
150
00:08:32,010 --> 00:08:36,530
So it's a very good agency.
Take some risks.com, check them
151
00:08:36,530 --> 00:08:39,690
out.
Robert Brady, PPC since 2006.
152
00:08:39,690 --> 00:08:42,929
Agency and consulting mostly
with a small in house stint at
153
00:08:42,929 --> 00:08:45,450
the beginning.
Austin Dillman in house from
154
00:08:45,450 --> 00:08:48,690
2006 to 2019.
Starting my consulting business
155
00:08:48,690 --> 00:08:51,890
in March 2019 and never looked
back.
156
00:08:52,440 --> 00:08:55,440
And those are answers for
question one and look at all the
157
00:08:55,440 --> 00:08:58,840
experience shared then.
This is why this is such an
158
00:08:58,840 --> 00:09:03,080
amazing group to follow and to
to hear what they have to say on
159
00:09:03,080 --> 00:09:05,880
things.
So we go to question 2.
160
00:09:05,880 --> 00:09:08,680
Julie asks, let's start with
contracts or agreements.
161
00:09:09,040 --> 00:09:11,840
Do you currently use contracts
or agreements with your clients?
162
00:09:11,840 --> 00:09:14,840
If not, why not?
Julia, VICE, yes.
163
00:09:15,000 --> 00:09:17,200
Oh heck here.
And we have a whole legal team
164
00:09:17,200 --> 00:09:19,910
to help us with it.
Julie goes, yeah, absolutely,
165
00:09:19,910 --> 00:09:22,750
100% of the time, yes.
Gil Gilner goes, yes.
166
00:09:22,750 --> 00:09:25,950
But usually clients have counsel
that develop their contracts and
167
00:09:25,950 --> 00:09:29,550
we have to adapt.
Melissa 100% Yes, very different
168
00:09:29,550 --> 00:09:31,830
at a small agency versus the
whole code though.
169
00:09:32,630 --> 00:09:35,670
And Michelle Yeager goes, yes I
do, Mostly for legal reasons by.
170
00:09:35,990 --> 00:09:39,510
But practically so far it's been
the best way for me to try to
171
00:09:39,510 --> 00:09:42,790
clarify the scope from the
beginning as an attempt to avoid
172
00:09:42,790 --> 00:09:46,470
massive scope creep.
I think it has helped, but I'm
173
00:09:46,470 --> 00:09:50,350
still majorly struggling with
boundaries, scope creep, knowing
174
00:09:50,350 --> 00:09:52,790
when to say no.
As a consultant, I find myself
175
00:09:52,790 --> 00:09:56,790
in a lot of Gray areas, which I
think might be more of a me
176
00:09:57,110 --> 00:10:00,280
problem and Gil Gillner goes.
In my experience, the bigger
177
00:10:00,280 --> 00:10:03,520
clients have bigger requirements
is a hassle, but I guess it pays
178
00:10:03,520 --> 00:10:06,040
off in the end.
Most of our smaller clients just
179
00:10:06,040 --> 00:10:09,120
do a a boilerplate sort of
thing.
180
00:10:09,480 --> 00:10:12,640
However, a lot of our clients
are foreign, so the contracts
181
00:10:12,640 --> 00:10:16,200
are questionably enforceable
either way.
182
00:10:16,760 --> 00:10:19,440
I say yeah, currently no, but
even when I was freelance, I
183
00:10:19,440 --> 00:10:24,540
dealt with contracting agencies.
So agencies that dual let me
184
00:10:24,540 --> 00:10:27,620
know about agent digital
marketing agencies that are
185
00:10:27,620 --> 00:10:32,700
looking for people to hire on a
freelance basis.
186
00:10:32,740 --> 00:10:36,790
And so they dealt with the
contracts and yeah, I just had
187
00:10:36,790 --> 00:10:39,750
to invoice every month and it
was always done through the
188
00:10:39,750 --> 00:10:42,950
agency and I'll be paid at
Friday of every week.
189
00:10:43,150 --> 00:10:45,750
Well every Friday.
So he was ah, I missed that.
190
00:10:45,750 --> 00:10:49,670
But yeah, trying to find clients
was also a tough started
191
00:10:49,670 --> 00:10:52,110
becoming a bit tough.
So yeah, didn't want to do that
192
00:10:52,110 --> 00:10:55,150
and some clients will delay
payment which is annoying.
193
00:10:55,550 --> 00:10:57,670
But no that's when I wasn't
using the agency.
194
00:10:57,670 --> 00:11:00,710
So yeah different experiences
Travis.
195
00:11:00,710 --> 00:11:04,560
Responsing agreement with
periodic Sow's and change
196
00:11:04,560 --> 00:11:07,160
orders.
Most clients have legal that
197
00:11:07,280 --> 00:11:10,880
legal that modifies the MSA.
That's an MSA as needed and
198
00:11:10,880 --> 00:11:13,600
Sow's and CEO's are rarely
touched, only signed.
199
00:11:14,080 --> 00:11:15,880
Julie goes.
Agreements or contracts both
200
00:11:15,880 --> 00:11:19,960
cover your butt and also clearly
layout expectations and terms
201
00:11:19,960 --> 00:11:23,120
when done properly.
Julia Weisko's contracts and
202
00:11:23,160 --> 00:11:26,240
Sow's are so important.
Never word it vaguely, but clear
203
00:11:26,520 --> 00:11:29,040
about what is included.
Yes, I'm in a discussion over
204
00:11:29,040 --> 00:11:32,020
this right now.
Nitish goes, yes, we are using
205
00:11:32,020 --> 00:11:34,900
contracts with every client
shared some very helpful tips
206
00:11:34,900 --> 00:11:39,100
regarding contracts as in Julie.
Julie Bichini shared very
207
00:11:39,100 --> 00:11:42,620
helpful tips regarding contracts
over Foxwall PPC discussion last
208
00:11:42,620 --> 00:11:44,460
week.
Thanks for that.
209
00:11:44,900 --> 00:11:47,940
Julie goes, I have had to sue a
client, so trust me when I say
210
00:11:47,940 --> 00:11:50,820
read all contracts and be sure
what is in them.
211
00:11:50,900 --> 00:11:56,850
Oh my God, read your contracts,
read, read, read the contract.
212
00:11:56,850 --> 00:12:00,530
It's so annoying with clients
who are going, Oh yeah, you
213
00:12:00,530 --> 00:12:03,450
tricked us into a new term.
No we didn't.
214
00:12:03,450 --> 00:12:07,290
If you read your contract, we're
following exactly what the term
215
00:12:07,330 --> 00:12:10,770
period is and what the rules of
the term of a current contract
216
00:12:10,770 --> 00:12:13,530
is.
And then Julia Vice goes, yeah,
217
00:12:13,530 --> 00:12:20,150
we are essentially at 150% on
hours due to reasons, but 50% on
218
00:12:20,150 --> 00:12:23,270
revenue from the pitch.
And now they want more stuff
219
00:12:23,270 --> 00:12:25,750
that is technically in scope,
says Madams.
220
00:12:25,750 --> 00:12:28,670
And all clients everywhere.
You cannot have what's in the
221
00:12:28,670 --> 00:12:33,110
SOW's if you consistently ask
for more than we agreed to
222
00:12:33,510 --> 00:12:36,510
deliver.
Julie also says, I also let me
223
00:12:36,510 --> 00:12:40,550
say here that if a client is
ever giving you grief about
224
00:12:40,550 --> 00:12:43,270
signing a contract, take that as
a major red flag.
225
00:12:43,270 --> 00:12:45,670
Absolutely.
If they are worried about a
226
00:12:45,670 --> 00:12:48,110
particular aspect of the
language, discuss it.
227
00:12:48,590 --> 00:12:52,350
I always stress that contracts
protect both parties, as the
228
00:12:52,350 --> 00:12:56,550
scope of work, price and other
details are all clearly defined
229
00:12:56,550 --> 00:13:01,190
and agreed to by both parties.
Now, Hopkins responds, saying
230
00:13:01,470 --> 00:13:05,750
contracts are safeguards for
both the clients and us. 10,000
231
00:13:05,750 --> 00:13:09,210
percent, 100,000% even they are
there.
232
00:13:09,370 --> 00:13:12,650
I will say I shifted my
perspective from six months or
233
00:13:12,650 --> 00:13:16,810
an annual to month to month.
This is in large part due to how
234
00:13:16,810 --> 00:13:20,770
campaigns types have shifted.
Google Now responsing We are
235
00:13:20,770 --> 00:13:24,090
month to month for the vast
majority of our clients as well.
236
00:13:24,090 --> 00:13:29,610
Some are annual duly responsing.
I use a hybrid model Nava with a
237
00:13:29,610 --> 00:13:33,130
commitment of three months after
the discovery strategy initial
238
00:13:33,170 --> 00:13:37,380
implementation part is complete
and then month to month after
239
00:13:37,460 --> 00:13:40,060
that phrase.
Andrews response saying super
240
00:13:40,060 --> 00:13:43,540
interesting around SOW and good
and bad clients.
241
00:13:43,980 --> 00:13:47,860
Bit of a plug, but Kirk Williams
of course stop the scale
242
00:13:47,860 --> 00:13:51,220
outlines.
So Kirk's book Stop the Scale
243
00:13:51,460 --> 00:13:53,860
outlines really well.
Some practical approaches to
244
00:13:53,860 --> 00:13:56,820
stop scope of work getting out
of hand?
245
00:13:56,820 --> 00:13:59,520
Absolutely, Julia.
Vice responsing, we stick to
246
00:13:59,560 --> 00:14:03,920
annual with 30 day out clauses
on both sides.
247
00:14:04,280 --> 00:14:08,160
The difference comes down to
retainer plus percentage or
248
00:14:08,160 --> 00:14:10,080
hourly.
There are good and bad versions
249
00:14:10,080 --> 00:14:13,280
of each.
We use an initial three month
250
00:14:13,280 --> 00:14:17,240
contract and after that it's
transitioned to monthly and
251
00:14:17,240 --> 00:14:20,200
Navagos as well saying I think
the other factor is whether
252
00:14:20,200 --> 00:14:23,560
we're percentage of spend or
flat rate lead or management
253
00:14:23,560 --> 00:14:26,200
fee.
I find that clients who go lead
254
00:14:26,200 --> 00:14:30,320
based or performance based need
more timelines in place in the
255
00:14:30,320 --> 00:14:33,920
contract because they get
temperamental general
256
00:14:33,920 --> 00:14:37,240
management.
There tends to be more trust
257
00:14:37,640 --> 00:14:40,640
doing Brown responsing.
We have a proposal SOW's and
258
00:14:40,640 --> 00:14:44,580
contracts as one doc.
We use Proposify to get
259
00:14:44,580 --> 00:14:46,900
everything digital digitally
signed.
260
00:14:47,260 --> 00:14:51,340
Been using it since 2019 and it
works well for clients of all
261
00:14:51,340 --> 00:14:54,140
sizes.
Julian Phillips says they are my
262
00:14:54,140 --> 00:14:57,380
most lucrative contracts so far
have been verbal, but I have
263
00:14:57,380 --> 00:15:00,980
much to learn about this stuff.
His contracts have been verbal.
264
00:15:01,220 --> 00:15:02,740
Oh, interesting.
Curious to see what others have
265
00:15:02,740 --> 00:15:05,340
been doing.
Well, we've listed it all out
266
00:15:05,340 --> 00:15:08,820
there for you Julian, and then
Brown says I know some who don't
267
00:15:08,820 --> 00:15:10,700
use one.
Those few times clients
268
00:15:10,700 --> 00:15:12,620
questions what we did or didn't
do.
269
00:15:12,620 --> 00:15:17,020
And I just pointed to the
proposal sow a couple years ago.
270
00:15:17,060 --> 00:15:20,540
One client wanted to shove the
contract terms in our face even
271
00:15:20,540 --> 00:15:23,660
when they didn't read it.
Then two weeks claim they are
272
00:15:23,660 --> 00:15:27,140
unsure that if we did something
because unsure of the very
273
00:15:27,140 --> 00:15:31,060
contract they had access to.
You cannot make this stuff up.
274
00:15:31,060 --> 00:15:34,820
Better to get it in writing.
As Julie Bichini said, not
275
00:15:34,820 --> 00:15:37,060
wanting to sign one is a big red
flag.
276
00:15:37,140 --> 00:15:41,220
Have good agencies.
Peeps are not pieces.
277
00:15:41,220 --> 00:15:44,700
You can just change out and
everything will be fine.
278
00:15:45,420 --> 00:15:48,060
Eric, how can responsing I tend
to work with smaller, more
279
00:15:48,060 --> 00:15:52,500
personal businesses with major
contract legalese isn't what
280
00:15:52,580 --> 00:15:56,500
either party cares for.
Sure, it exposes me to some more
281
00:15:56,500 --> 00:16:00,140
risk, but from a legal
standpoint, agreement emails
282
00:16:00,140 --> 00:16:03,900
with terms are legally binding,
just not as airtight.
283
00:16:04,480 --> 00:16:07,360
Robert Brady says I always have
a contract or agreement in place
284
00:16:07,520 --> 00:16:11,240
signed by both parties helps to
clarify the payment terms and
285
00:16:11,240 --> 00:16:13,560
scope.
It's a rolling month to month so
286
00:16:13,560 --> 00:16:17,400
I'm not locking anything into a
long term deal.
287
00:16:17,800 --> 00:16:23,280
So an Austin Dillman goes, every
client gets an NDA, MSA and SOW
288
00:16:23,880 --> 00:16:27,000
MSA.
We need a new acronym fill for
289
00:16:27,000 --> 00:16:31,510
that one and we simply go on to
question three, saying is there
290
00:16:31,510 --> 00:16:35,310
anything in your contract that
is there because you learned
291
00:16:35,310 --> 00:16:38,030
something the hard way?
If so, what is it?
292
00:16:38,030 --> 00:16:41,950
So what have people learned the
hard way and decided to put in
293
00:16:42,110 --> 00:16:43,950
interesting fact here that I
learned.
294
00:16:43,950 --> 00:16:49,590
I think it was doing my Rd. test
or Rd. driving test or something
295
00:16:49,590 --> 00:16:50,990
like that.
The lessons I was taking.
296
00:16:51,190 --> 00:16:55,070
One of my instructors said that
some signs, like the signs of
297
00:16:55,070 --> 00:16:58,380
like, you know, slow down.
You're about to go to an area
298
00:16:58,380 --> 00:17:01,660
that you can't see around the
bend and there's a sign of like
299
00:17:02,020 --> 00:17:05,660
a boomerang shaped sign kind of
thing telling you to slow down.
300
00:17:06,099 --> 00:17:10,140
Those kind of signs came into
place after an accident
301
00:17:10,140 --> 00:17:13,099
happened, so on some roads.
So they don't just put it
302
00:17:13,180 --> 00:17:15,700
everywhere, they put it after an
accident happened.
303
00:17:15,900 --> 00:17:19,119
So it just reminds me of that
because obviously you're asking
304
00:17:19,119 --> 00:17:22,560
the question of what have you
put in place after an accident
305
00:17:22,560 --> 00:17:24,839
has happened.
So Melissa McKee kicks us off
306
00:17:24,839 --> 00:17:28,000
saying I learned to spell out
the exact meeting and reporting
307
00:17:28,000 --> 00:17:30,520
cadence.
Otherwise your smallest client,
308
00:17:30,560 --> 00:17:34,200
smallest clients will demand the
biggest chunk of your time
309
00:17:34,200 --> 00:17:36,480
always.
It's the smallest, the ones that
310
00:17:36,480 --> 00:17:40,040
that that pay the least that
will demand the most honesty
311
00:17:40,480 --> 00:17:42,600
never Hopkins goes account to
build fees.
312
00:17:42,600 --> 00:17:46,810
I used to build campaigns as
part of the core engagement, but
313
00:17:46,810 --> 00:17:50,930
I found that folks who pay for
the build are more invested and
314
00:17:50,930 --> 00:17:54,450
buy into the process more than
those who get it for free.
315
00:17:54,890 --> 00:17:57,650
Julie Vice responsing?
Yes, actually, but it's a pretty
316
00:17:57,650 --> 00:18:01,090
corporate example.
We need credit protection ends
317
00:18:01,370 --> 00:18:05,010
for clients because we buy all
media and then bill it plus
318
00:18:05,010 --> 00:18:07,210
fees.
If they are not creditworthy,
319
00:18:07,250 --> 00:18:09,770
all platforms have to bill them
directly.
320
00:18:10,600 --> 00:18:14,080
Delivers response in response to
Nava Hawkins saying yes, those
321
00:18:14,080 --> 00:18:17,800
build fees need to be identified
and built separately.
322
00:18:18,240 --> 00:18:21,440
Travis responds, saying the two
biggest things I've learned are
323
00:18:21,440 --> 00:18:25,400
one clause that indicates all
work product is the property of
324
00:18:25,400 --> 00:18:28,320
client campaigns, payment
profiles, data research.
325
00:18:28,320 --> 00:18:32,720
Yes, two clause that mandates
that work product may be used
326
00:18:32,960 --> 00:18:35,920
with approval in final form to
promote my business.
327
00:18:36,160 --> 00:18:37,560
So case studies that kind of
thing.
328
00:18:38,330 --> 00:18:41,450
The former satisfies clients
that they own the work, plain
329
00:18:41,450 --> 00:18:44,490
and simple.
They pay and XYZ output is
330
00:18:44,490 --> 00:18:46,570
theirs.
The latter allows for self
331
00:18:46,570 --> 00:18:50,890
promotion, earning future work
and creates A symbiosis that's
332
00:18:50,890 --> 00:18:54,730
healthy in my experience.
You'll go now respond saying no.
333
00:18:54,730 --> 00:18:57,730
In our experience we have found
that we are better served by pre
334
00:18:57,730 --> 00:19:01,450
qualifying clients than spending
too much time enforcing things.
335
00:19:01,730 --> 00:19:04,490
Of course things always slip
through the cracks, but we try
336
00:19:04,490 --> 00:19:07,610
to keep things as open and easy
as possible.
337
00:19:08,010 --> 00:19:12,530
Since we're month to month with
the vast majority of clients, we
338
00:19:12,530 --> 00:19:15,890
have never had issues.
Granted, most of our clients are
339
00:19:15,890 --> 00:19:21,090
smaller, think less than
$2,000,000 per year of of spend,
340
00:19:21,290 --> 00:19:24,050
so they are usually pretty
flexible with things.
341
00:19:24,290 --> 00:19:27,010
Almost everything is in writing
in some way or the other.
342
00:19:27,010 --> 00:19:30,010
However, phrase Andrew's
responsing normally things like
343
00:19:30,010 --> 00:19:32,730
3 month clause.
If things aren't working well
344
00:19:32,730 --> 00:19:35,890
from the offset, it allows both
parties to leave and typically
345
00:19:36,400 --> 00:19:39,960
is a good way to keep things
relatively amicable.
346
00:19:40,360 --> 00:19:43,240
Michelle responds in I include
call cadence, and also
347
00:19:43,240 --> 00:19:46,360
expectations around conversion,
tracking, troubleshooting, et
348
00:19:46,360 --> 00:19:48,920
cetera.
Julia Vice responds in I'm
349
00:19:48,920 --> 00:19:53,400
Jealous and That's here, and
she's jealous of Travis saying
350
00:19:53,400 --> 00:19:56,880
specific brand permission needed
for every blog post, awards
351
00:19:56,880 --> 00:19:59,840
submission, and conference.
So yeah, especially for the
352
00:20:00,000 --> 00:20:04,600
close to that Travis mentioned
in terms of being able to use
353
00:20:04,600 --> 00:20:08,760
the work that he's things that
he's worked on for you know,
354
00:20:08,760 --> 00:20:13,440
promotion purposes for examples,
response saying, yeah, pre
355
00:20:13,440 --> 00:20:16,920
qualification is something that
nowhere near enough agencies are
356
00:20:17,200 --> 00:20:21,000
doing but totally should never
goes pre qualify stress free
357
00:20:21,000 --> 00:20:24,080
equals pre qualify equals to
stress free contracts.
358
00:20:24,470 --> 00:20:26,950
Julie goes level of
communication that is included.
359
00:20:26,950 --> 00:20:30,470
We have all had a client who
wants to e-mail, talk, etcetera
360
00:20:30,710 --> 00:20:32,470
way too much for what they're
paying.
361
00:20:32,750 --> 00:20:36,790
My working hours and time zone
and exclusion section about what
362
00:20:36,790 --> 00:20:39,590
is not included.
Oh, she continues.
363
00:20:39,630 --> 00:20:42,710
And what is an actual emergency
and how different types are
364
00:20:42,710 --> 00:20:47,110
handled as such as one did my
work caused the emergency, two
365
00:20:47,110 --> 00:20:50,310
did the platform caused the
emergency, three did the client
366
00:20:50,310 --> 00:20:53,720
caused the emergency.
Melissa goes that's part of the
367
00:20:53,720 --> 00:20:55,600
problem with being on Slack with
clients.
368
00:20:55,600 --> 00:20:59,160
They think it gives them free
reign to just ping you all day
369
00:20:59,160 --> 00:21:02,240
and night.
And Travis responds to Julia
370
00:21:02,240 --> 00:21:05,160
Vice saying, yeah, the
conversation that I have is what
371
00:21:05,160 --> 00:21:08,720
pace do you want to operate at
If you require granular
372
00:21:08,720 --> 00:21:11,600
permissions will operate slower
than we could.
373
00:21:12,040 --> 00:21:14,640
If we can achieve a mutual
trust, we can work towards
374
00:21:14,640 --> 00:21:17,860
breakneck speed.
It's not perfect, but it served
375
00:21:17,860 --> 00:21:19,740
me well.
Clients like that.
376
00:21:19,740 --> 00:21:23,100
They have control over the
things that matter and the
377
00:21:23,100 --> 00:21:25,100
respect that I need things out
of.
378
00:21:25,100 --> 00:21:27,900
The engagement as well,
absolutely should be mutually
379
00:21:27,900 --> 00:21:31,900
beneficial, not just from a
money perspective, Julie
380
00:21:31,900 --> 00:21:34,460
responds saying yeah, in
response to Melissa McKee
381
00:21:34,460 --> 00:21:38,300
saying, I try very, very hard to
not be on clients slack.
382
00:21:38,300 --> 00:21:41,860
If they insist they pay extra
and I am not instantly available
383
00:21:41,860 --> 00:21:45,520
for them, specify how frequently
I will check their Slack on
384
00:21:45,520 --> 00:21:48,800
business days.
That part is important too.
385
00:21:49,360 --> 00:21:53,000
And yeah, Julie Vice goes that
Status notifications is IT.
386
00:21:53,440 --> 00:21:56,560
Phrase Andrews Great says 24
hours response time in the
387
00:21:56,560 --> 00:21:59,400
working week are a nice way to
ensure that clients don't
388
00:21:59,400 --> 00:22:03,200
bombard you with messages.
This response can even just be
389
00:22:03,200 --> 00:22:06,320
an acknowledgement of receiving
the message, but it helps to
390
00:22:06,320 --> 00:22:10,120
stop clients and employees
feeling the need to be on it at
391
00:22:10,120 --> 00:22:12,720
all times.
Julie Vice responds very into
392
00:22:12,720 --> 00:22:16,520
this confirming receipt note
with next steps and timelines in
393
00:22:16,520 --> 00:22:19,120
the body.
And Julie as well says make sure
394
00:22:19,120 --> 00:22:21,440
you put in there your billing
terms too.
395
00:22:21,440 --> 00:22:24,800
In terms of the contract, that
is our invoices due upon
396
00:22:24,800 --> 00:22:27,680
request, Are they due within 30
days and what happens if they
397
00:22:27,680 --> 00:22:30,200
are late?
Lots of things in contracts are
398
00:22:30,240 --> 00:22:34,080
there for worst case scenario
and just because it is in there
399
00:22:34,400 --> 00:22:36,480
does not mean you have to
enforce it.
400
00:22:36,680 --> 00:22:40,720
You can certainly tell a client
that you're waiving the fee that
401
00:22:40,760 --> 00:22:44,720
is in the contract for late
payment etc, but it is there if
402
00:22:44,720 --> 00:22:47,760
you need to enforce it.
But as it goes, yeah, same
403
00:22:47,760 --> 00:22:51,320
reconfirming receipt.
Not saying I'll drop everything
404
00:22:51,320 --> 00:22:54,000
and do this.
Now River goes, we have a list
405
00:22:54,000 --> 00:22:56,160
of our responsibilities and
their responsibilities.
406
00:22:56,160 --> 00:22:59,280
Glad we have that.
So it's clear that they need to
407
00:22:59,280 --> 00:23:03,000
pay their bills with engines,
give us assets, etc.
408
00:23:03,760 --> 00:23:07,120
I have a turnaround times
specified to Julie goes, Julia
409
00:23:07,120 --> 00:23:09,800
goes.
I love a work back schedule with
410
00:23:09,800 --> 00:23:11,480
our deliverables.
They're deliverables.
411
00:23:11,480 --> 00:23:15,360
Creative deliverables.
Google, Microsoft deliverables.
412
00:23:15,560 --> 00:23:18,400
Chefs.
Kiss van Brown goes, if I look
413
00:23:18,400 --> 00:23:22,440
back at 2019 versus now, way
more detail and sometimes
414
00:23:22,440 --> 00:23:26,200
repeating things a few times.
Comms has gotten a couple
415
00:23:26,200 --> 00:23:29,920
updates to make it more clear we
don't do weekly meetings that
416
00:23:29,920 --> 00:23:33,600
are often a waste of time for
clients of exercise.
417
00:23:34,000 --> 00:23:38,040
Gil Gilner responds saying
nearly 100% of our clients comes
418
00:23:38,080 --> 00:23:41,440
are via e-mail.
The good ones get my cell phone
419
00:23:41,440 --> 00:23:44,160
number.
Even the good ones I think
420
00:23:44,160 --> 00:23:46,040
shouldn't get your cell phone
number.
421
00:23:46,040 --> 00:23:48,720
But anyway, Michelle responds.
I've been dreaming about
422
00:23:48,720 --> 00:23:53,510
including some part about baking
in vacation time for me since I
423
00:23:53,510 --> 00:23:58,230
usually usually do retainer, but
not sure if this is standard at
424
00:23:58,310 --> 00:24:00,910
all.
Eric Hiken responds not from a
425
00:24:00,910 --> 00:24:06,310
PPC standpoint, but if I take on
any web dev job, I'm writing an
426
00:24:06,310 --> 00:24:08,070
expiry period into my
agreements.
427
00:24:08,070 --> 00:24:10,190
Moving forward.
I've agreed to read you a
428
00:24:10,190 --> 00:24:12,910
friend's business website for an
X flat fee.
429
00:24:12,910 --> 00:24:16,350
It's been probably three years
I've had the full payment, but
430
00:24:16,350 --> 00:24:18,870
he stopped providing assets to
complete the job.
431
00:24:19,310 --> 00:24:22,950
So it sits there as a liability
to me that I have yet to make
432
00:24:23,030 --> 00:24:26,790
good on.
Oh Lord, Julie goes, yeah, you
433
00:24:26,790 --> 00:24:30,270
can absolutely stipulate how
your work shifts when you are on
434
00:24:30,270 --> 00:24:32,470
vacation and what kind of notice
you give.
435
00:24:32,470 --> 00:24:36,870
Although be careful on that as
when you give too much notice, I
436
00:24:36,870 --> 00:24:39,510
swear some clients hear that
you're retiring and not going to
437
00:24:39,510 --> 00:24:42,910
the beach for a week.
So all of a sudden it's like,
438
00:24:43,230 --> 00:24:48,070
OK, let's find a new paid search
consultant, Michelle goes, LOL.
439
00:24:48,070 --> 00:24:50,550
I get worried that they are
going to freak out and be like
440
00:24:50,550 --> 00:24:53,390
checking on stuff every day and
assuming things are emergencies
441
00:24:53,390 --> 00:24:56,990
when they are not, but I think I
need to just do it at some
442
00:24:56,990 --> 00:24:59,750
point.
Austin Dillman goes, yeah, more
443
00:24:59,750 --> 00:25:02,790
thorough in scope and out of
scope sections and stricter
444
00:25:02,790 --> 00:25:06,510
payment terms.
Minimum 50% upfront before work
445
00:25:06,510 --> 00:25:08,790
starts and shorter payment
cycles.
446
00:25:09,070 --> 00:25:13,270
Net 15 and now we go on to
question four.
447
00:25:13,470 --> 00:25:17,150
What is your biggest challenge
on the business side of PPC?
448
00:25:17,510 --> 00:25:21,470
Gilgilna goes hiring.
Nitish goes our second at a very
449
00:25:21,470 --> 00:25:24,030
time intensive process that I do
not enjoy.
450
00:25:24,510 --> 00:25:26,390
Julian Phillips goes finding new
clients.
451
00:25:26,390 --> 00:25:30,710
My first client is an agency and
I manage a number of accounts
452
00:25:30,710 --> 00:25:33,190
through them.
However, the time has come where
453
00:25:33,190 --> 00:25:36,190
I need to attract new clients
and I feel out of practice.
454
00:25:36,670 --> 00:25:41,170
Julia Weiss goes expectations.
I am great at what I do, and I
455
00:25:41,170 --> 00:25:43,810
lead a great team.
We are not Wizards and can't
456
00:25:43,810 --> 00:25:45,890
force Google to do things it
won't do.
457
00:25:45,890 --> 00:25:50,410
Clients tend to be unrealistic
about my limitations how much of
458
00:25:50,410 --> 00:25:53,050
their budgets can afford, and
partners like Google can be
459
00:25:53,050 --> 00:25:56,610
unrealistic about how much
budgets my clients actually
460
00:25:56,610 --> 00:25:58,890
have.
Travis goes inevitably.
461
00:25:58,890 --> 00:26:02,240
PPC is like a spool of yarn that
unravels.
462
00:26:02,320 --> 00:26:06,000
It uncovers creative and query
level insights that make clients
463
00:26:06,000 --> 00:26:08,160
go.
I need to address that.
464
00:26:08,720 --> 00:26:12,520
The resulting scope creep and
getting clients to pay for it is
465
00:26:12,520 --> 00:26:16,280
the biggest challenge for me.
Me, I said people not paying
466
00:26:16,280 --> 00:26:18,400
their invoices or even not on
time.
467
00:26:18,400 --> 00:26:21,600
So when they're just very late
with it and pretending they have
468
00:26:21,600 --> 00:26:25,880
no idea, we will make of
responsing pricing what clients
469
00:26:25,880 --> 00:26:29,320
can realistically and actually
afford to pay versus all the
470
00:26:29,320 --> 00:26:33,240
various costs involved.
A Julie goes, we can help you
471
00:26:33,240 --> 00:26:36,520
get better at this.
That was to Gillian Phillips,
472
00:26:36,960 --> 00:26:38,720
Fraser goes managing
expectations.
473
00:26:38,720 --> 00:26:42,920
I think it's always one a huge
part of tackling that is cross
474
00:26:42,920 --> 00:26:46,560
training teams to understand
that is what is isn't
475
00:26:46,600 --> 00:26:49,240
acceptable.
Also pricing can often be an
476
00:26:49,240 --> 00:26:51,360
ongoing issue.
It takes a lot to say.
477
00:26:51,360 --> 00:26:53,200
We've built this pricing for a
reason.
478
00:26:53,640 --> 00:26:56,680
One can't go lower.
Of course, there's some room for
479
00:26:56,680 --> 00:27:01,720
movement, but clients asking for
50% off is a huge red flag.
480
00:27:01,720 --> 00:27:04,680
Yeah, right.
Nava goes, yeah, to Gil's points
481
00:27:04,720 --> 00:27:07,360
charge upfront and don't do work
till it's paid.
482
00:27:07,880 --> 00:27:11,280
And Nava goes.
I lost roughly 15 K 15,000.
483
00:27:11,280 --> 00:27:14,320
Yeah.
Dollars. 15 K dollars because of
484
00:27:14,320 --> 00:27:16,080
trust in the decency of human
beings.
485
00:27:16,080 --> 00:27:18,360
Never again.
And then Julia Weiss goes, yeah,
486
00:27:18,360 --> 00:27:22,440
an immediate discount, 100%.
No, a la Pubel.
487
00:27:22,900 --> 00:27:24,420
I imagine that's how to say
nothing.
488
00:27:24,420 --> 00:27:27,900
Not possible.
If I'm too much, go find less
489
00:27:27,900 --> 00:27:31,180
exactly careful, find less in
price and go find less in the
490
00:27:31,180 --> 00:27:32,940
level of work that you're going
to get.
491
00:27:33,380 --> 00:27:36,420
Gil Gilner goes, we charge
upfront for every client.
492
00:27:36,500 --> 00:27:41,380
Even our annual clients pay in
one lump annual sum upfront.
493
00:27:41,700 --> 00:27:44,780
Wow, I find that very bold.
I find that very scary to do.
494
00:27:45,580 --> 00:27:48,620
Julie goes, yeah, prior to that,
getting checks in a timely
495
00:27:48,620 --> 00:27:53,100
manner was challenging about 50%
of the time for ongoing clients.
496
00:27:53,540 --> 00:27:57,500
And Michelle goes, yeah, the
Pandora's box that PPC lovers to
497
00:27:57,500 --> 00:28:00,980
open, that loves to open.
It leads to an insane amount of
498
00:28:00,980 --> 00:28:03,980
business related things for
clients that go way beyond the
499
00:28:03,980 --> 00:28:08,540
normal scope of what PPC is.
So yeah, the ensuing scope creep
500
00:28:08,540 --> 00:28:12,240
for me is the issue.
Julia Vice goes businesses have
501
00:28:12,240 --> 00:28:14,240
to pay.
It doesn't have to be emotional
502
00:28:14,240 --> 00:28:16,200
or dramatic.
Here's the bill, here's the
503
00:28:16,200 --> 00:28:18,280
payment terms.
If you need relief, we'll have a
504
00:28:18,280 --> 00:28:20,840
discussion and move on from
there.
505
00:28:21,200 --> 00:28:24,160
Julie as well says always get
paid at least some of the money
506
00:28:24,160 --> 00:28:29,040
upfront and do not let them get
too far into you if they are
507
00:28:29,040 --> 00:28:32,280
slow players.
We can't repossess our work, so
508
00:28:32,280 --> 00:28:35,920
make sure you're staying in pace
with the clients payments and if
509
00:28:36,390 --> 00:28:39,950
they start out great and then
get slow, address it in the
510
00:28:39,950 --> 00:28:43,350
first month.
And yeah, Nitish as well says
511
00:28:43,350 --> 00:28:46,590
contract needs to be signed, an
invoice paid before any work
512
00:28:46,590 --> 00:28:49,030
gets started.
Also every step of onboarding
513
00:28:49,350 --> 00:28:52,030
needs to be done before we start
working.
514
00:28:52,510 --> 00:28:55,390
Navigo is helping clients
understand whether they are in
515
00:28:55,390 --> 00:29:00,020
fact the right fit for PPC.
I see a lot of folks swindled
516
00:29:00,020 --> 00:29:03,540
into smaller budgets that are
not going to do anything, not
517
00:29:03,540 --> 00:29:06,620
knocking great account
management of smaller accounts.
518
00:29:06,620 --> 00:29:09,260
I just find it's more common
than smaller budgets.
519
00:29:09,300 --> 00:29:13,220
Accounts struggle here the most.
I talk more people out of
520
00:29:13,220 --> 00:29:16,540
running Google ads nowadays than
I do empowering them to leverage
521
00:29:16,580 --> 00:29:20,620
it because of auction prices and
creative requirements.
522
00:29:21,220 --> 00:29:23,780
Dan Patterson goes Honest
question for those of you that
523
00:29:23,860 --> 00:29:28,060
are agencies of fly solo with
all the big strategies and other
524
00:29:28,060 --> 00:29:30,980
services available in Google, is
it harder to justify your
525
00:29:30,980 --> 00:29:34,420
services these days or do you
mainly focus on consulting,
526
00:29:34,500 --> 00:29:38,300
working for companies that don't
have an internal team etcetera,
527
00:29:38,580 --> 00:29:41,940
something I've been wondering
about for a while now.
528
00:29:43,220 --> 00:29:46,340
Travis goes, yeah, for initial
work I charged 50% upfront and
529
00:29:46,460 --> 00:29:50,380
and then I'm Moretize the rest
of the bill over the remaining
530
00:29:50,380 --> 00:29:53,500
duration of work together it
requires both parties leaning in
531
00:29:53,500 --> 00:29:56,340
and serves well for longer term
agreements.
532
00:29:56,890 --> 00:29:59,770
Julia Vice responds to Dan
Patterson and his work on terms
533
00:29:59,770 --> 00:30:03,530
of getting clients.
Yeah, especially the whole bit
534
00:30:03,530 --> 00:30:07,250
strategies development and
automation development in Google
535
00:30:07,250 --> 00:30:09,610
especially Julia Vice was not at
all.
536
00:30:09,610 --> 00:30:13,090
While individual bit strategies
are more automated they still
537
00:30:13,090 --> 00:30:15,810
need expert advice and teams to
run the program.
538
00:30:16,130 --> 00:30:18,050
My clients are experts at their
business.
539
00:30:18,090 --> 00:30:22,020
I'm expert at this.
Love that Julian response.
540
00:30:22,020 --> 00:30:26,100
I also spend more time talking
folks out of PPC2 than in two.
541
00:30:26,140 --> 00:30:28,620
I know it's the right thing to
do, but it registers as
542
00:30:28,620 --> 00:30:31,860
counterproductive to people who
saw themselves as a potential
543
00:30:31,860 --> 00:30:34,140
client.
Feels like a lose, lose.
544
00:30:34,140 --> 00:30:37,580
It's not a lose, lose, Gil
Gilner responds to Dan Patterson
545
00:30:37,580 --> 00:30:40,220
as well, saying landscape has
definitely changed in the past
546
00:30:40,220 --> 00:30:43,220
couple of years.
But most of our clients have in
547
00:30:43,220 --> 00:30:45,980
house marketing departments,
even if it's just two to three
548
00:30:45,980 --> 00:30:48,560
folks.
The answer is going up markets,
549
00:30:48,560 --> 00:30:52,040
small businesses, small business
clients are going to be able to
550
00:30:52,040 --> 00:30:54,480
do all this themselves soon very
well.
551
00:30:55,000 --> 00:30:58,960
And clients will only be hiring
as and when the budgets are big
552
00:30:58,960 --> 00:31:02,920
enough to justify some real life
eyeballs on the campaigns.
553
00:31:03,520 --> 00:31:06,000
Julie as well says, I think our
work has shifted.
554
00:31:06,000 --> 00:31:08,960
That is, we are not watching
bids like Hawks these days.
555
00:31:09,320 --> 00:31:12,960
But there's so much to do.
There's so much to do to have
556
00:31:12,960 --> 00:31:16,480
even the most automated of
campaigns running optimally.
557
00:31:16,760 --> 00:31:20,040
The machines are still kind of
dumb in a lot of areas that we
558
00:31:20,040 --> 00:31:23,040
are not.
The machines are a lot dumb in a
559
00:31:23,040 --> 00:31:26,720
lot of areas that we are not.
So yeah, our our role is not
560
00:31:26,720 --> 00:31:30,040
going away.
Nava Hopkins, as well as
561
00:31:30,040 --> 00:31:31,600
responsing.
If the only value you were
562
00:31:31,600 --> 00:31:34,160
providing was bid adjustment,
you were likely in trouble.
563
00:31:34,160 --> 00:31:37,200
Absolutely.
I I suspect that if you dig into
564
00:31:37,200 --> 00:31:41,010
how you enable folks to succeed,
you'll see that there was quite
565
00:31:41,050 --> 00:31:45,330
a bit more you're doing on the
technical or analytics side.
566
00:31:45,330 --> 00:31:49,090
Conversion, tracking, setup and
vetting, creative and message
567
00:31:49,090 --> 00:31:51,850
mapping, as well as overall
strategy by channel.
568
00:31:52,130 --> 00:31:55,650
I'd argue this is probably the
most useful time to be a PPC
569
00:31:55,650 --> 00:31:59,170
practitioner because most brands
can't keep up with all the
570
00:31:59,170 --> 00:32:03,320
changes being made.
For examples as well says yeah
571
00:32:03,320 --> 00:32:06,320
it's an interesting one.
I've seen our role change more
572
00:32:06,320 --> 00:32:10,160
into data interpreters and truly
understanding the platforms to
573
00:32:10,160 --> 00:32:13,840
turn the right cogs.
I still think many clients can
574
00:32:13,840 --> 00:32:17,840
just shove a load of keywords
into the platform and think it
575
00:32:17,840 --> 00:32:20,720
will make them rich.
The biggest thing for me is the
576
00:32:20,720 --> 00:32:23,440
role of Google reaching out to
clients directly.
577
00:32:24,320 --> 00:32:27,200
And if anybody's experienced
this experiencing this, I
578
00:32:27,200 --> 00:32:30,990
recommend checking out Boris's
and his latest threads about
579
00:32:30,990 --> 00:32:33,390
teleperformance.
Interesting.
580
00:32:33,910 --> 00:32:36,670
Reva Minkov says that yeah, I
was literally just having this
581
00:32:36,670 --> 00:32:40,510
semi existential conversation
with my team as to what's going
582
00:32:40,510 --> 00:32:44,310
to work with smaller budgets.
Now I don't always think it's
583
00:32:44,310 --> 00:32:47,950
more money that's the solution,
but the tactics for PPC are
584
00:32:47,950 --> 00:32:52,830
changing, especially on Google.
And yeah, Reva Minkov as well
585
00:32:52,830 --> 00:32:55,490
say I agreed that AI is less of
an issue.
586
00:32:55,490 --> 00:32:58,450
You still really, really need
someone who knows what they're
587
00:32:58,450 --> 00:33:01,930
doing to stare the ship.
Julie goes smaller budget
588
00:33:01,930 --> 00:33:05,530
accounts are in trouble.
Such ads are very much mature
589
00:33:05,530 --> 00:33:08,570
ecosystem now and that means
it's pricing out smaller
590
00:33:08,570 --> 00:33:11,970
advertisers, which is what Nava
was talking about, you know,
591
00:33:11,970 --> 00:33:15,290
talking about up thread with
helping clients determine if
592
00:33:15,290 --> 00:33:17,970
such ads are even for them
today.
593
00:33:18,250 --> 00:33:21,010
It's all about keeping our
integrity and if you're just
594
00:33:21,010 --> 00:33:24,340
going to take someone's money,
take someone's budget and not
595
00:33:24,340 --> 00:33:27,540
actually deliver with them, you
shouldn't be in this industry.
596
00:33:27,820 --> 00:33:30,540
That's my opinion.
Fred Andrews response saying
597
00:33:30,580 --> 00:33:33,300
also super passionate about
spend efficiency.
598
00:33:33,300 --> 00:33:37,460
It's our job to fight back and
in will Reynolds words stop
599
00:33:37,460 --> 00:33:39,820
Google taking more of our
clients money right.
600
00:33:40,340 --> 00:33:42,180
That's what SC is also trying to
do as well.
601
00:33:42,420 --> 00:33:44,420
So that's why I love them Riva
as well.
602
00:33:44,420 --> 00:33:47,500
See I agreed that PPC isn't the
right answer for everyone but
603
00:33:47,500 --> 00:33:51,180
what are you using as your other
options these days feel feel
604
00:33:51,180 --> 00:33:55,330
like the new Serps, SEO's
especially is less effective
605
00:33:55,330 --> 00:33:59,410
than it was as is a good chunk
of organic social.
606
00:34:00,250 --> 00:34:03,130
And Julie says as let's not
forget the influence we had can
607
00:34:03,130 --> 00:34:06,530
have in the post click part of
the equation 2 right.
608
00:34:06,770 --> 00:34:10,330
Historically I know many have
been pretty hands off but I
609
00:34:10,330 --> 00:34:15,050
think that is a smart place to
build skills right now.
610
00:34:15,690 --> 00:34:20,250
And then we go on to question
five, our last question for very
611
00:34:20,330 --> 00:34:23,900
detailed and the most
interactive chat.
612
00:34:23,900 --> 00:34:26,739
I don't think there have been
this many answers that I've been
613
00:34:26,739 --> 00:34:29,260
given by this many people on any
of our Twitter chats.
614
00:34:29,340 --> 00:34:32,219
Honestly, I don't know, maybe
just people don't sometimes find
615
00:34:32,219 --> 00:34:34,260
the questions which I found is
the case.
616
00:34:34,260 --> 00:34:38,460
But this has been a very
detailed chat and probably one
617
00:34:38,460 --> 00:34:40,500
of the most that I've found over
Twitter.
618
00:34:40,500 --> 00:34:43,739
So yeah, be prepared, they're
like over 30 replies to this.
619
00:34:43,739 --> 00:34:47,139
But it'll be a summary to this
question I'll be giving, So not
620
00:34:47,219 --> 00:34:51,739
every response I'll read out.
So our last question of this
621
00:34:51,739 --> 00:34:56,260
chat is, do you have a business
of PPC questions vexing you
622
00:34:56,260 --> 00:34:59,500
right now?
Maybe we can help now the whole
623
00:34:59,500 --> 00:35:01,180
concerns.
I want to help everyone and I
624
00:35:01,180 --> 00:35:04,220
know I can't and that makes me
sad, you know, right.
625
00:35:04,810 --> 00:35:06,890
Julia Vice goes yes with one
particular client.
626
00:35:06,890 --> 00:35:08,610
I don't think y'all can help
with that.
627
00:35:08,610 --> 00:35:12,290
But I appreciate, I appreciate
chairs and well wishes are big
628
00:35:12,290 --> 00:35:15,850
chairs to you Julia And then
Julie goes, yeah, I want to help
629
00:35:15,890 --> 00:35:18,530
all the small businesses to in
response to Nava Hopkins
630
00:35:18,570 --> 00:35:22,090
especially don't want them to
get scammed or waste money on
631
00:35:22,090 --> 00:35:26,810
things that won't bring sales.
And I think that is a big thing
632
00:35:26,810 --> 00:35:29,970
for why paid search market is
with integrity.
633
00:35:30,450 --> 00:35:34,460
We'll still be able to find a
job, will still have clients,
634
00:35:34,460 --> 00:35:36,980
you know, we need to stay in
this industry for the sake of
635
00:35:36,980 --> 00:35:40,620
the clients who might be getting
scammed and duped by the ones
636
00:35:40,620 --> 00:35:43,500
that have no integrity.
So yeah, if you're one of those,
637
00:35:43,620 --> 00:35:48,100
keep in it, keep fighting for
telling how business this Our
638
00:35:48,100 --> 00:35:51,340
paid search should be done well.
Our businesses should be doing
639
00:35:51,580 --> 00:35:55,580
paid search well and not just
doing any kind of paid search.
640
00:35:56,440 --> 00:35:59,240
Travis goes what vexes means the
poor association with price
641
00:35:59,240 --> 00:36:02,200
versus value among businesses.
No one disagrees with the price
642
00:36:02,200 --> 00:36:05,640
of an apple.
It's $1.50 per pound and we pay
643
00:36:05,640 --> 00:36:09,040
that, no questions asked.
When mechanic says it costs X
644
00:36:09,040 --> 00:36:11,920
for the part, Y for the labor,
we pay the invoice.
645
00:36:12,160 --> 00:36:14,880
When it comes to online
services, people are far less
646
00:36:14,880 --> 00:36:17,360
seasoned.
Clients come to the table
647
00:36:17,360 --> 00:36:20,400
feeling like it's a negotiation,
and I don't yet have a complete
648
00:36:20,400 --> 00:36:22,680
solution for that.
Yeah.
649
00:36:22,680 --> 00:36:25,400
And so Gil asks, how do you
charge a flat rate?
650
00:36:26,130 --> 00:36:29,130
Go Travis goes.
I fully scope out services at an
651
00:36:29,170 --> 00:36:33,290
hourly rate and 50% upfront, the
rest spread evenly over the
652
00:36:33,290 --> 00:36:37,090
duration of work.
I try to be as blatantly
653
00:36:37,090 --> 00:36:41,370
transparent as possible.
Go says Ali, is a very difficult
654
00:36:41,370 --> 00:36:45,050
model unless you're a holder and
then never goes.
655
00:36:45,090 --> 00:36:46,810
Actually, maybe you all can help
me.
656
00:36:46,810 --> 00:36:50,490
I have some consulting clients
who use another PPC vendor to
657
00:36:50,490 --> 00:36:53,850
manage their accounts and they
do so many bad things.
658
00:36:54,430 --> 00:36:57,790
Don't let my clients own their
GA four and add accounts.
659
00:36:57,790 --> 00:37:00,470
No negative.
Almost all broad search with
660
00:37:00,470 --> 00:37:03,550
display select.
How do I help my client?
661
00:37:03,550 --> 00:37:06,190
They know they could fire the
agency but they don't.
662
00:37:06,550 --> 00:37:11,030
Also the agency manages the SEOI
was gobsmacked at how much My
663
00:37:11,030 --> 00:37:15,550
client pays them 18% management
fee to do Essentially nothing.
664
00:37:16,310 --> 00:37:18,430
Michelle responds.
I was wondering how often people
665
00:37:18,430 --> 00:37:20,470
renegotiate contracts with
clients.
666
00:37:20,470 --> 00:37:24,200
I have several clients who have
grown pretty significantly under
667
00:37:24,200 --> 00:37:29,920
my watch, like 5 to 20% X ad
spend return, et cetera.
668
00:37:29,920 --> 00:37:33,240
And the work is a lot more, my
responsibilities are greater, et
669
00:37:33,240 --> 00:37:35,200
cetera.
And I want to start having
670
00:37:35,200 --> 00:37:38,880
contract renegotiations built
into my process.
671
00:37:39,040 --> 00:37:41,960
How do others approach this?
I know we've talked about this
672
00:37:41,960 --> 00:37:46,390
and I think a good answer I
heard was review things on a
673
00:37:46,390 --> 00:37:49,870
yearly basis and let the clients
know that you plan that at at
674
00:37:49,870 --> 00:37:52,510
certain points of the year you
review the contractor, you
675
00:37:52,510 --> 00:37:56,710
review the work and increases in
price can happen.
676
00:37:56,710 --> 00:37:59,750
I think we did a whole
discussion about how you charge
677
00:37:59,750 --> 00:38:03,870
when you charge, how you, you
know, ensure clients know that
678
00:38:04,230 --> 00:38:06,830
the more work that you do the
more you need to charge them.
679
00:38:06,830 --> 00:38:10,580
That really needs to be part of
the contract or sow's.
680
00:38:10,580 --> 00:38:13,700
No, not sow, but the contract as
well, the Ogilner responds
681
00:38:13,700 --> 00:38:17,180
saying that we went 100% flat
rate retainer model tiered based
682
00:38:17,180 --> 00:38:19,340
on ad spend.
It's much easier and lets us
683
00:38:19,340 --> 00:38:23,700
build totally upfront phrase
Andrews goes ideas around how to
684
00:38:23,700 --> 00:38:26,740
approach completely cold clients
are always welcome.
685
00:38:27,420 --> 00:38:29,620
Build relationships.
That's my my advice.
686
00:38:29,620 --> 00:38:31,780
Build relationship, Build
people.
687
00:38:31,780 --> 00:38:34,180
Who will be your biggest
cheerleaders who would really
688
00:38:34,180 --> 00:38:37,410
want to work not just with the
company, but with their the
689
00:38:37,410 --> 00:38:40,890
account managers, the account
contact, so that even when they
690
00:38:40,890 --> 00:38:45,450
move on and leave a brand,
they're still singing your
691
00:38:45,450 --> 00:38:48,770
praise in their new job.
Julie responds, saying there is
692
00:38:48,770 --> 00:38:51,970
an annoyingly persistent
perception that things on or
693
00:38:51,970 --> 00:38:53,850
related to the Internet should
be cheap.
694
00:38:53,850 --> 00:38:56,170
I think the best way I have
found to handle this is by
695
00:38:56,170 --> 00:38:59,470
saying I am not the least
expensive provider out there.
696
00:38:59,670 --> 00:39:02,390
If that is your number one
priority and probably not the
697
00:39:02,390 --> 00:39:05,630
consultant for you.
Because if they don't inherently
698
00:39:05,630 --> 00:39:09,550
see or understand the value in
what I bring to the table, they
699
00:39:09,550 --> 00:39:12,110
will never be satisfied And who
needs that in their life?
700
00:39:12,150 --> 00:39:14,870
Absolutely.
Now Hopkins responsing consider
701
00:39:14,870 --> 00:39:18,990
letting them know that you have
them on a League legacy plan and
702
00:39:18,990 --> 00:39:23,190
you want to keep working with
them but need to move them into
703
00:39:23,190 --> 00:39:24,830
a different plan.
And that's what that's in
704
00:39:24,830 --> 00:39:28,630
response to Michelle talking
about how work has increased.
705
00:39:28,630 --> 00:39:30,550
She has really improved the
accounts.
706
00:39:30,790 --> 00:39:33,190
How does she charge more then
continuing?
707
00:39:33,190 --> 00:39:35,750
Nava goes however, as a thank
you for their loyalty.
708
00:39:35,750 --> 00:39:38,790
You'll discount the new plan
even if it's an upsell on where
709
00:39:38,950 --> 00:39:42,190
they are now.
Julie responds saying a response
710
00:39:42,190 --> 00:39:45,350
to Nava saying I think all you
can do in that scenario in terms
711
00:39:45,390 --> 00:39:49,600
of she has this clients, that or
possible client.
712
00:39:49,600 --> 00:39:54,200
It sounds like they have a paid
search agency doing bad PPC for
713
00:39:54,200 --> 00:39:55,880
them.
Just let's just call it bad.
714
00:39:55,960 --> 00:39:59,280
All the best practices are being
ignored and they're doing little
715
00:39:59,280 --> 00:40:04,440
to nothing for 18% of management
fee, Julie continues.
716
00:40:04,440 --> 00:40:07,160
I think all you can do in that
scenario is tactfully point out
717
00:40:07,200 --> 00:40:09,480
the issues whenever they are
relevant to what you're
718
00:40:09,480 --> 00:40:12,800
discussing with them.
You can lead a host to water,
719
00:40:12,800 --> 00:40:15,000
dot dot dot or you can't force
them to drink.
720
00:40:15,910 --> 00:40:18,630
Julia Vice response to Michelle
saying that I'd like to review
721
00:40:18,630 --> 00:40:20,550
regularly.
Doesn't need to be each year
722
00:40:20,550 --> 00:40:23,710
just a good cadence and share
new platforms, complexity,
723
00:40:23,710 --> 00:40:27,070
changes, hours needed to do new
talks, tasks.
724
00:40:27,110 --> 00:40:29,750
It can be very positive.
It can be a very positive
725
00:40:29,950 --> 00:40:32,830
conversation and if you show
them they might be the ones
726
00:40:32,830 --> 00:40:36,510
going oh wow, you've not
increased our spend.
727
00:40:36,910 --> 00:40:39,430
And I actually think by the fact
that you've not done it
728
00:40:39,430 --> 00:40:43,340
immediately should be a way to
encourage them to, you know,
729
00:40:43,340 --> 00:40:46,660
sign on that new contract, just
show them for like, hey, for X
730
00:40:46,660 --> 00:40:48,940
amount of months.
I've actually done be doing a
731
00:40:48,940 --> 00:40:52,780
lot more than when I started
writing when when we when we
732
00:40:52,860 --> 00:40:56,300
first signed this contract.
Based on that we're going to
733
00:40:56,300 --> 00:40:58,060
increase it.
And because I'm already giving
734
00:40:58,060 --> 00:41:01,740
you a discount, sign this new
contract quickly and I think
735
00:41:01,740 --> 00:41:04,220
people will understand that
people know that you need to get
736
00:41:04,220 --> 00:41:06,380
paid for the job you do, don't
they?
737
00:41:07,100 --> 00:41:08,210
They do, right?
Right.
738
00:41:08,650 --> 00:41:11,490
Anyway, Julia, Vice responds.
What is your role in this?
739
00:41:11,490 --> 00:41:14,090
Do you do they see you as a PPC
expert?
740
00:41:14,530 --> 00:41:15,770
Never.
Hawkins goes, yeah.
741
00:41:15,970 --> 00:41:19,450
Kirk put this in a great way.
Our E hourly rate, and that's
742
00:41:19,450 --> 00:41:22,450
the person who does hourly In
response to the person who does
743
00:41:22,490 --> 00:41:26,130
hourly, you're not paying for
how much time it takes.
744
00:41:26,450 --> 00:41:28,730
Me.
You're paying for how well I can
745
00:41:28,730 --> 00:41:30,250
get it done as quickly as
possible.
746
00:41:30,730 --> 00:41:33,450
If I get it done quicker, I
should get to get paid more, not
747
00:41:33,450 --> 00:41:36,050
less time, not less.
So that's why hourly is very
748
00:41:36,050 --> 00:41:38,810
dangerous.
Travis goes, yeah, perhaps you
749
00:41:38,810 --> 00:41:41,570
expose them to how much freedom
you offer.
750
00:41:42,490 --> 00:41:46,210
With me, you own 100% of what
you should GA four is yours as
751
00:41:46,210 --> 00:41:50,210
your work product your own.
Here's a third party source or
752
00:41:50,210 --> 00:41:53,530
article that validates what I'm
saying so you can hear it
753
00:41:53,530 --> 00:41:56,450
elsewhere.
I want to extend that freedom to
754
00:41:56,610 --> 00:41:59,650
the business.
So yeah, in terms of nervous
755
00:41:59,690 --> 00:42:02,520
issue with her very problematic
client?
756
00:42:02,960 --> 00:42:05,480
Never response saying yes.
They hired me specifically to
757
00:42:05,480 --> 00:42:07,280
help them challenge their
vendors.
758
00:42:08,000 --> 00:42:10,640
Gogonas responsing my single
most important tip?
759
00:42:10,640 --> 00:42:12,840
Charge more.
The more you charge, the less
760
00:42:12,840 --> 00:42:16,840
fuss anyone has about the price.
PPC experts are rarer than
761
00:42:16,840 --> 00:42:19,240
you'll think, right?
Right.
762
00:42:19,280 --> 00:42:20,680
I should get back into
freelancing.
763
00:42:21,000 --> 00:42:23,080
Don't tell anyone now the
Hopkins goes.
764
00:42:23,080 --> 00:42:26,520
To be clear, I don't want to
take the business away from the
765
00:42:26,520 --> 00:42:29,440
vendor.
If anything, I want them to pay
766
00:42:29,640 --> 00:42:32,480
their team more and grow their
current staff.
767
00:42:33,000 --> 00:42:36,160
Julie Vice goes, aha, then roll
up your sleeves, build out a
768
00:42:36,160 --> 00:42:39,680
strategy with specifics on what
could be done differently, and
769
00:42:39,680 --> 00:42:43,400
show what the spend could
potentially get on the different
770
00:42:43,400 --> 00:42:46,480
management.
Then let them decide.
771
00:42:47,200 --> 00:42:51,080
And yeah, Julie goes built it,
built it, build it into having a
772
00:42:51,080 --> 00:42:52,720
yearly conversation with ongoing
clients.
773
00:42:52,720 --> 00:42:55,560
And that's a response to
Michelle about the scope of what
774
00:42:55,560 --> 00:42:58,200
you're doing for them.
You can even position it along
775
00:42:58,200 --> 00:43:01,480
the lines of let's make sure we
have this set up in the most
776
00:43:01,480 --> 00:43:05,320
efficient way possible.
And then Julia Vice goes, yeah,
777
00:43:05,720 --> 00:43:07,920
something's not connecting for
me.
778
00:43:07,920 --> 00:43:11,440
In response to Nava, the work is
below par in terms of quality.
779
00:43:11,440 --> 00:43:14,360
So they want more dollars in
order to do better.
780
00:43:14,770 --> 00:43:17,450
I'd get that vendor to make
serious commitments in that
781
00:43:17,610 --> 00:43:21,330
issue, in that situation.
And yeah, and response.
782
00:43:21,330 --> 00:43:25,570
So about Michelle's issue in
regards into making more money
783
00:43:25,570 --> 00:43:29,490
with more work, we sometimes do
climate meetings to ensure we're
784
00:43:29,490 --> 00:43:34,570
on track, communicating well and
to create room to change or grow
785
00:43:34,650 --> 00:43:38,250
the relationship where needed.
And yeah, Michelle goes, I love
786
00:43:38,250 --> 00:43:41,530
this idea because I also want
better feedback from my kind on
787
00:43:41,530 --> 00:43:46,020
how the partnership is going and
when Brown responds here in
788
00:43:46,020 --> 00:43:49,900
terms of what Travis was saying
about like about hourly rates,
789
00:43:49,900 --> 00:43:52,020
interesting take on hours.
I like your thinking.
790
00:43:52,020 --> 00:43:55,660
We took on one hourly brand last
year as they really wanted to
791
00:43:55,660 --> 00:43:58,660
work with us.
I just had to charge a high rate
792
00:43:58,660 --> 00:44:02,700
to make it worthwhile for the
work, which was 30% or higher
793
00:44:02,700 --> 00:44:05,620
than the two closest competitors
pitching.
794
00:44:05,860 --> 00:44:10,460
I still don't love hours, but
you got to charge for it, as you
795
00:44:10,460 --> 00:44:12,750
said.
And then Julie goes, yeah, the
796
00:44:12,750 --> 00:44:16,950
bottom line on in how you price
and position things in your
797
00:44:16,950 --> 00:44:20,230
agreements really comes down to
how well it works for you and
798
00:44:20,230 --> 00:44:23,750
your situation too.
As with everything PPC, there
799
00:44:23,750 --> 00:44:26,110
really is not just one way to do
anything.
800
00:44:26,470 --> 00:44:29,510
And when Brown also says if you
are making money and are
801
00:44:29,510 --> 00:44:34,510
profiting with how this year is
going, you are doing a good job,
802
00:44:34,630 --> 00:44:38,750
I say so Lately, if you're if
you're going by your principles,
803
00:44:38,750 --> 00:44:40,750
you're doing things with
integrity, you're making the
804
00:44:40,750 --> 00:44:44,470
money, you're making sure you're
increasing your rate according
805
00:44:44,470 --> 00:44:48,190
to the work that you're doing.
You're doing well.
806
00:44:48,190 --> 00:44:50,950
So guys, stop being stressful
with each other, with
807
00:44:50,950 --> 00:44:53,990
yourselves, even if you're not.
You're getting it's slow on
808
00:44:53,990 --> 00:44:58,350
clients and getting your clients
be be easier to yourself, be
809
00:44:58,350 --> 00:44:59,950
kind to yourself.
That's something I need to
810
00:44:59,950 --> 00:45:02,310
remind myself.
And on that note, we come to the
811
00:45:02,310 --> 00:45:05,980
end of this long chat.
That was definitely a summary.
812
00:45:05,980 --> 00:45:09,780
I didn't read all the responses
and look at how much we got
813
00:45:09,780 --> 00:45:12,220
through, so let's quickly wrap
up.
814
00:45:12,220 --> 00:45:13,900
I hope you've taken some great
takeaways.
815
00:45:13,900 --> 00:45:18,340
I imagine there's going to be a
voice conversation about this
816
00:45:18,340 --> 00:45:21,260
topic on Thursday, 5:00 PM G and
5:00 PM BST.
817
00:45:21,260 --> 00:45:24,540
So we're in British summertime,
but at 12:00 PM Eastern Time on
818
00:45:24,540 --> 00:45:28,860
Discord on our Discord channel.
So look out for the PPC chat
819
00:45:29,140 --> 00:45:32,620
group on Discord to join the
voice chat.
820
00:45:33,170 --> 00:45:36,130
Before any feedback about the
podcast or even some correction
821
00:45:36,130 --> 00:45:38,730
and anything I've said, get in
touch with me on Twitter, on
822
00:45:38,730 --> 00:45:43,170
threads, on my handle at the
Marketing Annual, or just follow
823
00:45:43,170 --> 00:45:45,130
me on LinkedIn and let me know
what you think.
824
00:45:45,610 --> 00:45:48,170
It'd be great for longstanding
and brand new listeners to give
825
00:45:48,170 --> 00:45:50,690
the podcast a review.
It really helps with the growth
826
00:45:50,970 --> 00:45:54,810
strategy of the podcast, and you
can do that on Spotify and Apple
827
00:45:55,010 --> 00:45:59,130
wherever.
Just go to linktree.com/P PC
828
00:45:59,130 --> 00:46:02,950
chat under score roundup to get
get to do that.
829
00:46:02,950 --> 00:46:06,230
It'll take seconds.
And finally, before I go, by the
830
00:46:06,230 --> 00:46:08,990
time you'll be listening to
this, PPC Live UK will be
831
00:46:08,990 --> 00:46:14,070
happening tomorrow on Thursday,
the 27th of July.
832
00:46:14,070 --> 00:46:15,590
Are we in July?
Yes, we're in July.
833
00:46:16,070 --> 00:46:20,230
You believe it, 27th of July.
We've got 3 speakers, we've got
834
00:46:20,230 --> 00:46:23,430
red velvet cake, we've got
drinks that I've already ordered
835
00:46:23,750 --> 00:46:27,390
yesterday and food that's going
to be ordered on the day so that
836
00:46:27,390 --> 00:46:30,650
they're fresh and hot for the
audience members.
837
00:46:30,650 --> 00:46:32,690
There's so many more tickets to
be sold.
838
00:46:32,690 --> 00:46:36,250
Go to PPC live U k.com.
There's a button right to the
839
00:46:36,250 --> 00:46:39,570
top saying buy tickets.
So go and buy your tickets is
840
00:46:39,570 --> 00:46:43,050
going to be a fun one year
anniversary celebration and I'm
841
00:46:43,050 --> 00:46:47,610
so proud, must say so proud.
Finally remember for your
842
00:46:47,610 --> 00:46:49,850
campaigns and businesses to
glide smoothly.
843
00:46:49,850 --> 00:46:52,370
There's a lot of hard work
needed beneath the surface, so
844
00:46:52,650 --> 00:46:54,930
keep your Swans kicking by and
speak to you next week.