Dec. 21, 2022

EP235 - PPC Holiday Wish List

EP235 - PPC Holiday Wish List

#ppcchat Twitter discussion that runs on Tuesdays at 5pm GMT - Led by Julie Bacchini (@NeptuneMoon)

Q1 What is your holiday wish for Google Ads?

Q2 What is your holiday wish for Microsoft Ads?

Q3 What is your holiday wish for Facebook Ads?

Q4 What is your holiday wish for LinkedIn Ads?

Q5 What is your holiday wish for Twitter Ads?

Q6 What are your holiday wishes for other ad platforms - TikTok, Snapchat, Pinterest, Quora, Reddit, etc.?

Q7 What is your holiday wish for the PPC industry?

Q8 What is your holiday wish for the PPC Chat community?


Thank you for listening!

Please help grow the podcast - and rate/review on Spotify, Amazon, Apple Podcast & more - linktr.ee/ppcchat_roundup

1
00:00:00,200 --> 00:00:03,400
Hello, and welcome to this
week's episode of the PPC chat

2
00:00:03,400 --> 00:00:07,300
Roundup in today's episode.
We have Julie taken us on a

3
00:00:07,300 --> 00:00:10,500
lovely, and of year appropriate
topic.

4
00:00:10,500 --> 00:00:13,500
We're talking about PPC holiday
wish list.

5
00:00:13,500 --> 00:00:17,500
So, yeah, hopefully your
wishlist have been met, because

6
00:00:17,500 --> 00:00:20,100
are we talking three days before
Christmas four days before

7
00:00:20,100 --> 00:00:22,100
Christmas?
Yeah, the President should have

8
00:00:22,100 --> 00:00:26,100
been bought and wrapped up.
But in terms of paid search what

9
00:00:26,100 --> 00:00:28,900
we wish for next year?
Yes, maybe I think we've

10
00:00:28,900 --> 00:00:31,900
definitely happened.
Tough time to send Google and

11
00:00:31,900 --> 00:00:35,500
Facebook and talk on quora, and
all the different platforms are

12
00:00:35,500 --> 00:00:38,900
worthless of what we are wishing
for 2023.

13
00:00:38,900 --> 00:00:41,700
So join us in this chat as we
share that with you.

14
00:00:51,100 --> 00:00:54,200
Hello and a warm, welcome to
this episode of the PPC chat

15
00:00:54,200 --> 00:00:56,700
Roundup a podcast way.
I round up the Twitter

16
00:00:56,700 --> 00:00:59,500
discussions that happen on
Tuesdays at 5 p.m.

17
00:00:59,500 --> 00:01:01,100
GMT.
I'm your host.

18
00:01:01,100 --> 00:01:04,300
A new and I'm recording from my
studio here in London UK.

19
00:01:04,500 --> 00:01:07,700
And I use this platform to share
not just expert but also my

20
00:01:07,700 --> 00:01:10,900
ideas and considered best
practices about paid media and

21
00:01:10,900 --> 00:01:13,600
the direction the digital
industry is going in.

22
00:01:13,900 --> 00:01:16,100
So if you want to keep up to
date with my tips and tricks in

23
00:01:16,100 --> 00:01:18,900
the industry, and get the latest
on the podcast that has been

24
00:01:18,900 --> 00:01:21,800
called your 02.
If you don't make it to the PPC

25
00:01:21,800 --> 00:01:24,700
chat live discussions and even
if you do then like, follow

26
00:01:24,700 --> 00:01:26,200
share and retweets on.
That's right.

27
00:01:26,200 --> 00:01:29,300
Twitter with my handle the
marketing, a new or join us on

28
00:01:29,300 --> 00:01:32,400
our LinkedIn Group, which is the
PPC chat Roundup podcast.

29
00:01:32,400 --> 00:01:35,200
Or if you're on Instagram, why
don't you check us out at PPC,

30
00:01:35,200 --> 00:01:38,800
chat underscore Roundup to get
quotes and Snippets from our

31
00:01:38,800 --> 00:01:42,100
previous episodes.
So we have Julie rounding us up.

32
00:01:42,100 --> 00:01:44,800
I believe this will be the last
chat of the year because she's

33
00:01:44,800 --> 00:01:48,300
taking a well-deserved holiday
between Christmas and New Year,

34
00:01:48,300 --> 00:01:51,500
which is next week.
So, yeah, I lost conversation.

35
00:01:51,500 --> 00:01:55,200
Chat of the year will be about
PPC, holiday wish list.

36
00:01:55,200 --> 00:01:58,500
But as usual, she asked, how are
we all doing learn skills?

37
00:01:58,500 --> 00:02:01,800
The final push before Q5 also
been working on getting my

38
00:02:01,800 --> 00:02:06,400
documentation together for taxes
and for 2023, the less glamorous

39
00:02:06,400 --> 00:02:09,000
side of small business
ownership.

40
00:02:09,000 --> 00:02:12,800
Boris goes our taxes, don't we
all love doing them go taxes.

41
00:02:12,800 --> 00:02:16,800
That's why I have an accountant
money very well spent Julie goes

42
00:02:16,800 --> 00:02:19,300
doing her kbz times with the
holiday.

43
00:02:19,500 --> 00:02:24,100
Cutting towards us Alex Nicole
goes I'm doing well and Robert.

44
00:02:24,100 --> 00:02:27,200
Brady has joins us as well as
Dwayne Brown going it's always

45
00:02:27,200 --> 00:02:29,900
wear this time of years.
It is quiet on the streets and

46
00:02:29,900 --> 00:02:33,800
busy in stores.
Trying to enjoy the quiet times

47
00:02:33,800 --> 00:02:37,600
and Alyssa McKee as well joins
us, but we'll get to that.

48
00:02:37,600 --> 00:02:40,900
Before we get into the questions
though, she goes, this chat is

49
00:02:40,900 --> 00:02:43,400
intended for PPC, Professionals
of all levels.

50
00:02:43,700 --> 00:02:46,300
If you have something you want
to share, please do we are a

51
00:02:46,300 --> 00:02:48,800
friendly and supportive
Community, please don't be

52
00:02:48,800 --> 00:02:52,400
afraid to Participate lurkers,
as well as listeners of the

53
00:02:52,400 --> 00:02:55,800
podcasts are, of course, always
welcome say.

54
00:02:55,800 --> 00:02:58,500
Yes, welcome to this fantastic
lost.

55
00:02:58,500 --> 00:03:01,900
Chat of the year, but let's get
right into the chats because we

56
00:03:01,900 --> 00:03:05,000
know, holiday wish list, we want
to see what platforms.

57
00:03:05,000 --> 00:03:08,200
We're going to be asking about
Julie, asks the first question

58
00:03:08,200 --> 00:03:10,500
going, let's start with
platforms.

59
00:03:10,500 --> 00:03:13,100
What is your holiday?
Wish for Google?

60
00:03:13,300 --> 00:03:17,000
And loads of them, manage him
goes, load faster.

61
00:03:17,000 --> 00:03:22,800
Make things easier to find fix
the To Boggs and ux issues Derek

62
00:03:22,800 --> 00:03:25,700
Mullins response saying, not
that it would ever happen but it

63
00:03:25,700 --> 00:03:29,300
would be cool if they opened a
Futures Market to bet on the

64
00:03:29,300 --> 00:03:32,300
price of keywords.
Akin to the financial markets.

65
00:03:32,900 --> 00:03:34,000
I'm not sure.
I understand that.

66
00:03:34,000 --> 00:03:35,900
But anyway, you'll kill me as
well response.

67
00:03:35,900 --> 00:03:39,000
Saying, my holiday wish is that
all of our clients, make a lot

68
00:03:39,000 --> 00:03:42,900
of money with Google ads and
they end the year with warm and

69
00:03:42,900 --> 00:03:47,000
fuzzy feelings in their hearts
for their PPC agency.

70
00:03:47,000 --> 00:03:51,200
Oh girl, that's sweet.
Rory response and continue to

71
00:03:51,200 --> 00:03:53,700
improve accountability.
I've noticed an increase in

72
00:03:53,700 --> 00:03:57,700
ownership from Google reps as of
late, whether it is related to

73
00:03:57,700 --> 00:04:01,700
recommendations going wrong or
producing deliverables on time,

74
00:04:01,800 --> 00:04:05,000
doesn't know PPC, Cindy
response, same, my wish that

75
00:04:05,000 --> 00:04:07,100
Google would go back to
providing options for

76
00:04:07,100 --> 00:04:10,500
advertisers of all skill levels
were let experts managed

77
00:04:10,500 --> 00:04:13,800
accounts as we see fit to
provide the query data match

78
00:04:13,800 --> 00:04:18,399
types at types Etc, to do so.
So Andrew Goodman joins us, they

79
00:04:18,399 --> 00:04:23,600
don't Etas allow us to
Performance reports on Ric

80
00:04:23,600 --> 00:04:27,400
elements so that we not unseen
forces can optimize them.

81
00:04:27,500 --> 00:04:30,800
We're struggling in an
environment of worsening rowing

82
00:04:30,800 --> 00:04:35,900
higher CTR is forced to use one
ad format that is more promising

83
00:04:35,900 --> 00:04:39,800
than performance.
Blast-off Labs response, same

84
00:04:40,000 --> 00:04:43,900
restore p.m. and eem so phrase
match an exact match match types

85
00:04:43,900 --> 00:04:48,300
to their previous Behavior, pre
2021 or provide the option for

86
00:04:48,300 --> 00:04:52,800
advertisers He's or agencies to
select that at the keyword level

87
00:04:53,200 --> 00:04:55,600
and then Julia cells respond
saying, where to start.

88
00:04:55,600 --> 00:04:59,000
I wish there were better options
to serve accounts with low

89
00:04:59,000 --> 00:05:03,200
conversion levels and long
conversions better reporting for

90
00:05:03,200 --> 00:05:06,200
our essays, a query or a keyword
match.

91
00:05:06,200 --> 00:05:10,500
Feedback tool to report bad
matches and teach the machines.

92
00:05:10,500 --> 00:05:13,900
Yes, the machines are still
learning, Ashton clock, response

93
00:05:13,900 --> 00:05:16,100
to that team.
Better RSA reporting would be

94
00:05:16,100 --> 00:05:18,700
huge.
Even just adding in clicks would

95
00:05:18,700 --> 00:05:21,400
be amazing.
So we can at least get insight

96
00:05:21,400 --> 00:05:25,300
into CTR and we have learned
Chase responding saying I have

97
00:05:25,300 --> 00:05:28,400
to actually that have heard over
the past few months.

98
00:05:28,400 --> 00:05:32,500
One I would like a negative list
we can manage for pmax

99
00:05:32,500 --> 00:05:34,900
campaigns.
If we have to do a workaround

100
00:05:34,900 --> 00:05:38,900
that means it won't be available
sometime in the future number to

101
00:05:38,900 --> 00:05:43,300
increase allowed asset numbers
and manage in response to that

102
00:05:43,300 --> 00:05:45,100
saying.
I know we don't want to work

103
00:05:45,100 --> 00:05:47,800
around but you can ask Google
wrap or support to add a

104
00:05:47,808 --> 00:05:51,700
negative keyword list of emacs
campaign and then you can edit

105
00:05:51,700 --> 00:05:53,800
the list in Google ads.
Yeah.

106
00:05:53,800 --> 00:05:56,300
Lawrence goes, you know, I am
just afraid that they will

107
00:05:56,300 --> 00:06:00,600
stealth remove it one day since
it's not technically supported.

108
00:06:00,600 --> 00:06:02,000
Yeah, exactly.
That kind of thing.

109
00:06:02,000 --> 00:06:04,800
That's a workaround, it can
easily remove it and Julie

110
00:06:04,800 --> 00:06:07,700
response to Lawrence in terms of
the two things he asked for

111
00:06:07,700 --> 00:06:10,200
saying yes to both of these
Boris Becker.

112
00:06:10,200 --> 00:06:12,200
Egos.
All I want from Google is less

113
00:06:12,200 --> 00:06:15,200
volatility and dedicated stuff
for btb.

114
00:06:15,200 --> 00:06:18,900
They were like 12 likes to that
one and know in terms of volume

115
00:06:18,900 --> 00:06:19,800
of life.
To get head.

116
00:06:19,800 --> 00:06:23,200
That is almost viral Julie
response and it speaks to our

117
00:06:23,200 --> 00:06:27,200
optimism when we still with for
real, actual B2B, Solutions and

118
00:06:27,200 --> 00:06:29,700
features, doesn't it?
Melissa goes haha.

119
00:06:29,700 --> 00:06:33,100
I was writing blog post ten
years ago called Google hits B2B

120
00:06:33,100 --> 00:06:35,300
and nothing has changed.
Yeah.

121
00:06:35,700 --> 00:06:38,100
Google.
Get some more love to be to be

122
00:06:38,300 --> 00:06:40,700
Jim would head.
Slowly goes asking Google ads to

123
00:06:40,700 --> 00:06:43,800
do something difficult, but high
quality and maybe a bit

124
00:06:43,800 --> 00:06:47,000
expensive to them rather than
something cheap nasty, an

125
00:06:47,000 --> 00:06:50,300
expensive for advertisers and
we're asking, For unicorn for

126
00:06:50,300 --> 00:06:54,100
Christmas, Barnes goes, hey
don't just Crush my dreams like

127
00:06:54,100 --> 00:06:56,300
that.
Yes, let's not be here to crush

128
00:06:56,300 --> 00:06:58,300
the dreams and Lawrence goes as
well saying.

129
00:06:58,300 --> 00:07:01,600
Yeah, my B2B clients feel very
left behind by Google.

130
00:07:01,600 --> 00:07:05,700
And if ten years go on going
with this, nothing has changed.

131
00:07:05,700 --> 00:07:07,000
Google.
Ya.

132
00:07:07,300 --> 00:07:09,000
Actin clock.
Respond saying my wish for

133
00:07:09,000 --> 00:07:12,400
Google ads is better support.
I'm tired of going into meetings

134
00:07:12,400 --> 00:07:15,400
with our reps and getting
nothing out of it other than

135
00:07:15,400 --> 00:07:19,200
saying no to unhelpful
suggestions or sales pitches

136
00:07:19,700 --> 00:07:23,800
Constantly changing reps every
quarter and re explaining things

137
00:07:23,800 --> 00:07:26,700
to them is a pain to Lawrence
goes.

138
00:07:26,700 --> 00:07:28,000
Yeah.
You see why most people just

139
00:07:28,000 --> 00:07:30,300
ignore them now.
I have an email template for

140
00:07:30,300 --> 00:07:32,700
them that I use.
It's not their fault, but it

141
00:07:32,700 --> 00:07:36,700
does impact us a lot and Ashton
goes, yeah, we're planning to

142
00:07:36,700 --> 00:07:38,900
meet with them less now to and
agreed.

143
00:07:38,900 --> 00:07:41,100
I don't blame them for having to
do their job.

144
00:07:41,300 --> 00:07:44,300
I think, the bigger issue is
that Google basically views reps

145
00:07:44,300 --> 00:07:48,200
as an extension of their sales
teams, but advertisers need them

146
00:07:48,200 --> 00:07:52,700
for actual Technical doing
things according to Performance

147
00:07:52,900 --> 00:07:54,400
support.
That's what we need.

148
00:07:54,700 --> 00:07:56,800
Sean Ellie response in a time
machine option.

149
00:07:56,800 --> 00:08:00,100
I can go back three years.
Have my key words, match to the

150
00:08:00,100 --> 00:08:03,200
write queries, be able to see
the queries have supported that

151
00:08:03,200 --> 00:08:06,200
actually helps me.
But if we are talking realistic,

152
00:08:06,200 --> 00:08:10,200
a delay in GA for until they get
the ux improved.

153
00:08:10,200 --> 00:08:13,700
Lord, considering we given a
years support, and we still

154
00:08:13,700 --> 00:08:17,000
don't feel that we're ready.
And the supports, the ux is not

155
00:08:17,000 --> 00:08:20,100
even ready for that.
One year had Lead time that we

156
00:08:20,100 --> 00:08:24,100
got, that's wearing Alex.
Nicole respond saying so many in

157
00:08:24,100 --> 00:08:27,300
terms of answering this question
one that's a budget management

158
00:08:27,300 --> 00:08:29,800
more clarity into RSA asset
performance.

159
00:08:30,100 --> 00:08:33,900
Improved search term reporting
more useful interactions with

160
00:08:33,900 --> 00:08:37,200
Google ads reps.
I could probably keep going but

161
00:08:37,200 --> 00:08:40,400
those are the big ones off the
top of my head.

162
00:08:40,600 --> 00:08:42,900
And then dealer gives another
answer to question.

163
00:08:42,900 --> 00:08:46,600
One saying, stop matching
competitors names to Brand terms

164
00:08:46,600 --> 00:08:49,100
for my clients if your main
selling.

165
00:08:49,200 --> 00:08:53,000
Point on fuzzing Up of matching
was let the machine find the

166
00:08:53,000 --> 00:08:56,400
best converting terms.
I guarantee a competitor ain't

167
00:08:56,400 --> 00:09:00,800
that since surely anyone who has
run competitor campaigns.

168
00:09:00,800 --> 00:09:05,100
Yes, definitely better matching
wearing brown noser response to

169
00:09:05,100 --> 00:09:08,400
question wanting.
I wish that more PMS would talk

170
00:09:08,400 --> 00:09:12,400
with advertisers and agencies as
much as they talk with business

171
00:09:12,600 --> 00:09:15,700
owners.
So we then go on to question 2

172
00:09:15,700 --> 00:09:19,100
after our rant about Google ads.
We love a good round.

173
00:09:19,500 --> 00:09:23,600
What is your holiday wish for
Microsoft adso?

174
00:09:23,900 --> 00:09:27,200
PPC, Cindy goes wish for
Microsoft ad, stop copying

175
00:09:27,200 --> 00:09:29,000
Google.
And create a platform that

176
00:09:29,000 --> 00:09:33,200
actually competes.
Many of us would invest more.

177
00:09:34,000 --> 00:09:36,000
Yeah.
He again trying to do something

178
00:09:36,000 --> 00:09:38,000
that would be much more
expensive for them and not

179
00:09:38,000 --> 00:09:41,600
necessarily, you know, no
explicit proof that he will

180
00:09:41,600 --> 00:09:44,800
reach a real benefit for them
hard to get them to do that and

181
00:09:44,800 --> 00:09:47,300
Melissa McKee as well.
Respond saying don't force us

182
00:09:47,300 --> 00:09:50,900
into the Audience Network.
That is a terrible move.

183
00:09:50,900 --> 00:09:54,500
Yes, show us the benefits of it,
but don't force it.

184
00:09:54,800 --> 00:09:57,600
And then Julie goes, I was about
to answer question to buy had to

185
00:09:57,600 --> 00:10:00,700
add this for Google ads.
Give us real Support options.

186
00:10:00,700 --> 00:10:04,700
I don't need the recommendations
read to me, or support document.

187
00:10:04,700 --> 00:10:08,200
If I'm reaching out, I need
actual assistant ring in your

188
00:10:08,200 --> 00:10:11,800
aggressive reps to show.
Nelly response to question 2

189
00:10:11,800 --> 00:10:15,000
saying, I wish Microsoft would
finally get the nerve to get out

190
00:10:15,000 --> 00:10:17,700
of Google's Shadow.
Google is upsetting a lot of

191
00:10:17,700 --> 00:10:20,800
advertisers SM, He's with their
changes.

192
00:10:20,800 --> 00:10:24,000
And instead of welcoming those
people to a better platform,

193
00:10:24,000 --> 00:10:27,800
they just Implement worse
versions of Google's changes

194
00:10:27,800 --> 00:10:30,700
Lord.
Julius wants to question 2 as

195
00:10:30,700 --> 00:10:33,500
well saying, get the LinkedIn
data integrated already.

196
00:10:33,500 --> 00:10:37,500
I could sell the hell out of
advertising on Microsoft ads, if

197
00:10:37,500 --> 00:10:41,500
it was a combo of Bing and
Linkedin Lawrence response, an

198
00:10:41,500 --> 00:10:44,800
easy one, connect linked into
Microsoft advertising today,

199
00:10:44,800 --> 00:10:45,800
please?
No, really.

200
00:10:45,800 --> 00:10:49,200
Please just do it.
Also, maybe stop adopted.

201
00:10:49,300 --> 00:10:52,700
No Google Shady practices and be
the better platform for Brands.

202
00:10:52,700 --> 00:10:56,500
So, yeah, a lot of this ensured
bringing LinkedIn data, stop

203
00:10:56,500 --> 00:10:59,300
copying Google Gilbert as well
as response to that same.

204
00:10:59,300 --> 00:11:02,300
It's already sorted linked.
We have been testing some feels

205
00:11:02,300 --> 00:11:06,400
like targeting career rolls.
Ah so girl thinks that LinkedIn

206
00:11:06,400 --> 00:11:09,400
data is already been linked in
Microsoft advertising.

207
00:11:09,400 --> 00:11:13,000
Yeah I hope more people are
testing that actor joins us

208
00:11:13,000 --> 00:11:15,500
responding to question once and
I would like to learn how we can

209
00:11:15,500 --> 00:11:18,600
use Google ads in a more
cohesive way with other

210
00:11:18,600 --> 00:11:20,600
channels.
With more competition, High

211
00:11:20,600 --> 00:11:24,400
cpc's less human control, it
would be harder to figure out

212
00:11:24,400 --> 00:11:28,200
the recipe, but we'll be looking
forward to the AI and Google ads

213
00:11:28,500 --> 00:11:30,100
combo.
Dwayne Brown response to

214
00:11:30,108 --> 00:11:33,600
question to say, Microsoft needs
to focus on shopping ads and

215
00:11:33,600 --> 00:11:37,700
it's untapped growth.
Potential lines also responds to

216
00:11:37,700 --> 00:11:40,700
Julie where Julie had answered
question to st.

217
00:11:40,700 --> 00:11:43,900
Get the LinkedIn data.
Integrated already Lawrence goes

218
00:11:43,900 --> 00:11:47,100
folks already have their tag set
up conversion actions and

219
00:11:47,100 --> 00:11:49,700
everything.
Not to mention the If Dad's

220
00:11:49,700 --> 00:11:53,000
platform is way more user
friendly than LinkedIn.

221
00:11:53,000 --> 00:11:56,100
So yeah, we're desperate to not
need to use LinkedIn directly

222
00:11:56,100 --> 00:11:59,300
and to use it through Microsoft
Microsoft, I hope you're

223
00:11:59,300 --> 00:12:01,600
listening.
And then yeah, Julie takes us on

224
00:12:01,600 --> 00:12:05,400
to question 3, what is your
holiday wish for Facebook ads

225
00:12:05,400 --> 00:12:08,400
over there should be a long one
management goes roll out

226
00:12:08,500 --> 00:12:12,300
Advantage Plus shopping
campaigns, to all accounts ASAP,

227
00:12:12,300 --> 00:12:15,700
gildner goes, we don't do
Facebook ads anymore at all.

228
00:12:15,700 --> 00:12:18,700
I'm so glad I don't have to
think about it at all.

229
00:12:18,700 --> 00:12:20,700
Whatever.
I'm stir, fire.

230
00:12:20,700 --> 00:12:24,100
Facebook, are you hearing?
So on any response saying,

231
00:12:24,100 --> 00:12:27,400
completely new business manager.
I have zero ideas, who designed

232
00:12:27,400 --> 00:12:31,200
a business manager, or as
manager, Etc, but they clearly

233
00:12:31,200 --> 00:12:34,900
never had to use it.
And Julie goes how about an

234
00:12:34,900 --> 00:12:38,800
offline Editor to might as well.
Wish big Lawrence goes.

235
00:12:38,800 --> 00:12:42,400
I worried they would make it as
bad as business manager,

236
00:12:42,700 --> 00:12:45,900
actually goes Fair.
Yeah, if what they're doing

237
00:12:45,900 --> 00:12:49,500
already is anything to, you
know, take from, in terms of of

238
00:12:49,500 --> 00:12:51,500
predictions of what they could
create.

239
00:12:51,500 --> 00:12:55,500
Yeah, it's not good news yet.
Julie response to question 3

240
00:12:55,800 --> 00:12:59,100
saying I'm not doing a ton of
Facebook ads right now but too

241
00:12:59,100 --> 00:13:02,800
glaring, issues, complete lack
of support for vast majority of

242
00:13:02,800 --> 00:13:06,900
advertisers ridiculous to, if
your accounts get hacked, you're

243
00:13:06,900 --> 00:13:09,700
screwed.
No way to get help and certainly

244
00:13:09,700 --> 00:13:12,700
not in timely manner.
Dwayne, Brown response.

245
00:13:12,700 --> 00:13:14,400
Question 3 saying, nothing for
Facebook.

246
00:13:14,400 --> 00:13:18,200
As I just wish the social side
of the platform would die.

247
00:13:18,300 --> 00:13:20,900
Lord, that is Worse than Iran
for Google ads.

248
00:13:21,700 --> 00:13:24,200
Ashton Clark response to a
question to saying, seeing this

249
00:13:24,200 --> 00:13:27,300
mentioned already by expanding
their use of LinkedIn audiences

250
00:13:27,300 --> 00:13:29,700
would be awesome.
Also, not automatically opt-in

251
00:13:29,700 --> 00:13:32,800
search campaigns into the
Audience Network and being able

252
00:13:32,800 --> 00:13:37,700
to lower bids for multimedia ads
which are auto set to minus 40

253
00:13:37,700 --> 00:13:39,900
percent.
Anyway, Lawrence response to

254
00:13:39,900 --> 00:13:41,900
question 3 saying I love
Facebook ads.

255
00:13:42,000 --> 00:13:44,600
Oh, that's news.
And how they perform for my

256
00:13:44,600 --> 00:13:47,900
clients.
The biggest issue issues, I have

257
00:13:47,900 --> 00:13:51,600
with Facebook ads is Their user
interface is cobbled together

258
00:13:51,600 --> 00:13:56,100
with duct tape and zero
usability in mind the other, not

259
00:13:56,100 --> 00:14:00,300
sure it is even possible, but
their support is much worse than

260
00:14:00,300 --> 00:14:02,900
Google Lord.
And we have Ashton responded to

261
00:14:02,900 --> 00:14:04,600
question.
Three saying there's a, lotta

262
00:14:04,600 --> 00:14:08,200
LOL, but an offline editor
easier, way to make bulk changes

263
00:14:08,200 --> 00:14:11,500
would be the number one wish
Ashton continue said.

264
00:14:11,500 --> 00:14:13,900
It also drives me crazy that if
you edit something, this

265
00:14:13,900 --> 00:14:17,900
navigation will reset back to
the top after making a change.

266
00:14:17,900 --> 00:14:22,000
So if you're editing Ads at the
bottom, you have to scroll back

267
00:14:22,000 --> 00:14:26,000
down to edit the next one,
pretty specific or minor thing,

268
00:14:26,000 --> 00:14:30,300
LOL, but always slows me down
and he shows a screenshot of

269
00:14:30,300 --> 00:14:32,800
what he means.
Are you guys finding the same

270
00:14:32,800 --> 00:14:35,400
issue as well?
We then go on to question 4,

271
00:14:35,400 --> 00:14:37,700
what is your holiday wish for
LinkedIn ads?

272
00:14:37,700 --> 00:14:40,800
I feel that, you know, might
just be the same as what we have

273
00:14:40,900 --> 00:14:44,500
for Microsoft, but no Gil
surprises me with this one

274
00:14:44,500 --> 00:14:48,000
saying, lower your cpc's, bro.
Please Julie goes.

275
00:14:48,000 --> 00:14:50,400
I honestly think this is one of
the biggest reasons that

276
00:14:50,400 --> 00:14:53,500
LinkedIn and Microsoft ads have
not been combined.

277
00:14:53,700 --> 00:14:56,600
Actually that is true.
Because Microsoft ads is also

278
00:14:56,600 --> 00:15:01,300
famously known as they have very
lower cpcs compared to LinkedIn.

279
00:15:01,300 --> 00:15:04,800
We then bring that together and
Microsoft might consider that

280
00:15:04,800 --> 00:15:09,000
they will my lose their clients
lose advertising spend because

281
00:15:09,000 --> 00:15:12,400
all of a sudden, the cpc's have
to go up, Gildan goes.

282
00:15:12,400 --> 00:15:15,300
Yeah, you're probably 100% ride.
LinkedIn is just way too

283
00:15:15,300 --> 00:15:19,100
lucrative from Microsoft.
I'm sure that sounds.

284
00:15:19,300 --> 00:15:21,800
A little sarcastic to me.
Anyway, I'm sorry.

285
00:15:21,800 --> 00:15:25,100
Question for Julie goes.
I wish I could just straight-up

286
00:15:25,100 --> 00:15:28,900
duplicate an ad, and it would
make a totally new ad and not

287
00:15:28,900 --> 00:15:33,500
keep it associated with the ad.
I duplicated I duplicate cause I

288
00:15:33,500 --> 00:15:37,000
want to use it as a basis and
make edits and have it.

289
00:15:37,000 --> 00:15:41,300
Have its own clean data stream.
Yes, that would be great.

290
00:15:41,500 --> 00:15:44,000
And then we have Dwayne Brown
responding to question for going

291
00:15:44,000 --> 00:15:46,200
build.
A better LinkedIn ads manager

292
00:15:46,400 --> 00:15:49,100
seen upgrades but it feels
clunky.

293
00:15:49,200 --> 00:15:50,800
Key.
And then show Natalie response

294
00:15:50,800 --> 00:15:54,800
to question forcing easy ability
to edit and duplicate having to

295
00:15:54,800 --> 00:15:57,700
create a new lead form.
Every time you want to add a

296
00:15:57,700 --> 00:16:01,800
field to it gets tiresome, then
Julie takes us on to question

297
00:16:01,800 --> 00:16:05,000
five saying what is your holiday
wish for Twitter ads?

298
00:16:05,000 --> 00:16:07,400
Starting off Gil.
Gil going to goes, I am secretly

299
00:16:07,400 --> 00:16:08,900
loving Twitter ads.
Right now.

300
00:16:08,900 --> 00:16:12,800
Engagement has been so high.
We don't do any paid social for

301
00:16:12,800 --> 00:16:16,200
clients, but I always try to
test on our own accounts.

302
00:16:16,200 --> 00:16:19,000
I have High Hopes just don't die
Twitter.

303
00:16:19,000 --> 00:16:23,300
Yeah, No, like Elon in fact that
might be an issue Lawrence

304
00:16:23,300 --> 00:16:26,100
response to that saying, yeah, I
have not tested Twitter yet with

305
00:16:26,100 --> 00:16:27,700
clients.
We still have a lot of

306
00:16:27,700 --> 00:16:30,200
opportunity.
Elsewhere at the moment, but as

307
00:16:30,200 --> 00:16:34,600
long as it sticks around, it
could be a good spot to test and

308
00:16:34,600 --> 00:16:37,500
managing response to question.
Five saying look-alike audience.

309
00:16:37,500 --> 00:16:41,000
That's all he says, look I like
audiences Lawrence response

310
00:16:41,000 --> 00:16:42,700
question for first, though,
saying what?

311
00:16:42,700 --> 00:16:45,200
Pretty much?
Everyone is saying a better ad

312
00:16:45,200 --> 00:16:49,000
tooth editing duplicating
creating also yoshi-p.

313
00:16:49,200 --> 00:16:51,800
These would be nice, and that's
for Holiday, wish for LinkedIn

314
00:16:51,800 --> 00:16:53,600
ads.
Julie then goes on to answer

315
00:16:53,600 --> 00:16:55,200
question.
Five herself saying my holiday

316
00:16:55,200 --> 00:16:58,800
wish for Twitter is that it
stabilizes and becomes a place

317
00:16:58,800 --> 00:17:00,700
where Brands want to spend
money.

318
00:17:00,700 --> 00:17:03,900
After that better targeting
options would be super the

319
00:17:03,900 --> 00:17:07,800
targeting options are so odd.
So, Nelly response to question.

320
00:17:07,800 --> 00:17:11,200
Five saying, I'd rather not get
my account suspended, but let's

321
00:17:11,200 --> 00:17:15,400
just say better targeting
options and less volatility and

322
00:17:15,400 --> 00:17:17,200
we have Julie techno songs with
later.

323
00:17:17,200 --> 00:17:20,200
Question 6 saying what are your
holiday Wishes for other AD

324
00:17:20,200 --> 00:17:21,900
platform.
So the likes of tick-tock

325
00:17:21,900 --> 00:17:27,300
Snapchat, Pinterest Cora Reddit,
Etc, girls response to the

326
00:17:27,308 --> 00:17:30,100
question 6 saying.
Yeah, may take talk be banned

327
00:17:30,100 --> 00:17:33,600
make Snapchat Fade Into
Obscurity May Pinterest.

328
00:17:33,600 --> 00:17:35,700
Finally find what it's looking
for.

329
00:17:36,000 --> 00:17:40,200
Met Korra fix its bot problem, I
may read it adds continue to be

330
00:17:40,200 --> 00:17:46,500
a secret weapon in my Batcave.
Also no excess say something

331
00:17:46,500 --> 00:17:50,100
that I am thinking exactly right
now she goes l, LOL your wish

332
00:17:50,100 --> 00:17:54,200
list is dope.
Girl totally do that was such

333
00:17:54,200 --> 00:17:59,200
like you know lyrical flow in
how he said that it was so cool.

334
00:17:59,900 --> 00:18:02,700
We then have Lawrence Chase
responding to question 6 saying,

335
00:18:02,700 --> 00:18:07,200
keep developing and look at what
works for platforms and what is

336
00:18:07,200 --> 00:18:10,900
not support your advertisers and
the brands they represent, give

337
00:18:10,900 --> 00:18:14,100
us alternative to the big 23
platforms out there.

338
00:18:14,500 --> 00:18:18,500
I am excited by Hulu, Disney
Spotify and others.

339
00:18:18,500 --> 00:18:22,000
Yeah, lots Excited about John,
Keegan response to question,

340
00:18:22,000 --> 00:18:25,400
five saying stop pretending your
brand safe.

341
00:18:25,400 --> 00:18:30,500
So what that was for linking, I
believe Ashton response to know.

342
00:18:30,500 --> 00:18:33,300
That was that was another one
Twitter, maybe Twitter.

343
00:18:33,300 --> 00:18:35,500
Yeah, that was for Twitter
because it's question for that

344
00:18:35,500 --> 00:18:38,200
was for LinkedIn.
So, action in response to a

345
00:18:38,300 --> 00:18:40,900
question for in terms of the
holiday wish for LinkedIn as the

346
00:18:40,900 --> 00:18:43,500
platform can be pretty clunky to
work in.

347
00:18:43,700 --> 00:18:45,600
So a better interface would be
nice.

348
00:18:45,800 --> 00:18:49,800
Jordan Cagan gives his honest
question 6, in terms of Multiple

349
00:18:49,800 --> 00:18:51,100
platforms.
What's the issues?

350
00:18:51,100 --> 00:18:54,300
They're snapchatted to accept
their reality?

351
00:18:54,300 --> 00:18:57,700
Rest need volume, Julie response
to question 6.

352
00:18:57,700 --> 00:19:00,100
Saying I would like some
platforms to gain more market

353
00:19:00,100 --> 00:19:02,200
share.
So, their actual viable

354
00:19:02,200 --> 00:19:05,400
alternatives to the big to
Google and Facebook and for

355
00:19:05,400 --> 00:19:09,800
brand safety to just be baked
in, and not a constant Battle of

356
00:19:09,800 --> 00:19:11,200
vigilance.
Oh, wow.

357
00:19:11,200 --> 00:19:12,800
We've got, I think two more
questions.

358
00:19:13,100 --> 00:19:17,000
Julie goes, what is your holiday
wish for the PPC industry that

359
00:19:17,000 --> 00:19:21,700
we keep speaking out for me?
Anyway that we keep speaking out

360
00:19:21,700 --> 00:19:24,900
in these kind of ways.
As to, where's Pratt platform

361
00:19:25,100 --> 00:19:29,700
can do better that they're more
viable challenges to the big 23.

362
00:19:29,700 --> 00:19:32,700
So, the Google, the Facebook,
who's the biggest one, who's the

363
00:19:32,700 --> 00:19:35,700
third biggest crop in length?
It is a little bit third,

364
00:19:35,700 --> 00:19:39,100
biggest one in CPC levels.
Anyway, and Drew magary response

365
00:19:39,100 --> 00:19:41,700
to question seven saying, for
people across marketing teams to

366
00:19:41,700 --> 00:19:44,900
see others as potential
collaborators and not open it,

367
00:19:45,200 --> 00:19:49,000
absolutely break down the silos,
break down the silos.

368
00:19:49,100 --> 00:19:55,200
If I was a protest in my virtual
purse testing world with a with

369
00:19:55,200 --> 00:19:58,600
a banner that will be what I'll
be printing out, break down the

370
00:19:58,600 --> 00:20:00,800
silos girl responds to that
saying.

371
00:20:00,800 --> 00:20:03,700
I wish that the Apple search
engine will become a real thing

372
00:20:03,700 --> 00:20:07,500
and then Apple search ads will
become a real thing.

373
00:20:07,500 --> 00:20:10,600
Yeah, there was a little bit,
talk about that.

374
00:20:10,600 --> 00:20:14,500
Paco and Banuelos response.
Give us back all Search terms.

375
00:20:14,500 --> 00:20:16,900
Yes, all of it.
I love that as well.

376
00:20:17,200 --> 00:20:20,400
Actor response to question six
saying, Here, I would say, I

377
00:20:20,400 --> 00:20:23,900
will explore opportunities to
stop relying solely on Google

378
00:20:23,900 --> 00:20:26,700
and Facebook.
I'm looking into native as well

379
00:20:26,700 --> 00:20:31,000
and out brain tabula, Samantha
Gemini Etc.

380
00:20:31,000 --> 00:20:33,800
Would be some of the names to
question.

381
00:20:33,800 --> 00:20:37,500
Seven John Keegan response as a
set uniform standards.

382
00:20:37,600 --> 00:20:41,100
All Pros should meet to weed out
the hacks and the scammers.

383
00:20:41,100 --> 00:20:44,100
Absolutely Julie response,
question 17.

384
00:20:44,100 --> 00:20:47,300
I wish that more people shared
information, that was helpful

385
00:20:47,300 --> 00:20:50,800
and in contacts, rather, Than
that all the just do this.

386
00:20:50,800 --> 00:20:53,000
Look how I'm killing it.
Contents.

387
00:20:53,000 --> 00:20:56,400
Yes, the whole hundred percent,
you know, volume increase when

388
00:20:56,400 --> 00:20:59,500
it's literally going from like
four clicks to eight clicks

389
00:20:59,500 --> 00:21:01,600
through know.
It's Chanel a response to

390
00:21:01,600 --> 00:21:04,100
question 17.
I wish at some point platforms

391
00:21:04,100 --> 00:21:07,400
will actually listen to the
industry as a whole make

392
00:21:07,400 --> 00:21:10,700
meaningful changes to their
platforms that help advertisers.

393
00:21:10,700 --> 00:21:14,200
And most of all, bring back
support seemed like the most

394
00:21:14,200 --> 00:21:16,300
consistent response today.
Yeah.

395
00:21:16,300 --> 00:21:18,500
Bring back support and just
listen to this chat.

396
00:21:18,500 --> 00:21:21,400
This chat Already.
There we are very active, at

397
00:21:21,400 --> 00:21:23,900
least on a weekly basis, if not
every day.

398
00:21:23,900 --> 00:21:27,300
Like, some people last question
of the day, I want to get this

399
00:21:27,300 --> 00:21:29,200
to this one.
What is your holiday?

400
00:21:29,200 --> 00:21:31,700
Wish, for the PPC, chat
community and I love it.

401
00:21:31,700 --> 00:21:34,600
This is how it going.
Let's just get feedback in terms

402
00:21:34,600 --> 00:21:38,300
of how I can help you better
love that from Julie, Gil.

403
00:21:38,300 --> 00:21:41,600
Gonna respond saying, I wish low
cpc's high, CTR them, several

404
00:21:41,600 --> 00:21:43,800
months of mulled wine for
everyone.

405
00:21:44,100 --> 00:21:48,900
This Chris love that from girl.
We have a Lawrence responding.

406
00:21:49,100 --> 00:21:52,300
To question, seven saying, Gil,
mentioned this already, but

407
00:21:52,300 --> 00:21:55,400
Apple search, it will be a real
competitor to Google right out

408
00:21:55,400 --> 00:21:58,300
of the gate, and we'll change
the game, all those phones and

409
00:21:58,300 --> 00:22:01,200
computers that Apple has in the
market.

410
00:22:01,200 --> 00:22:04,400
Yes, absolutely.
They have Prime product ready

411
00:22:04,400 --> 00:22:07,700
for Apple search, to get going
at a response to question seven

412
00:22:07,700 --> 00:22:10,100
as well, saying to still exist
in the coming years.

413
00:22:10,100 --> 00:22:12,500
I know PPC would not completely
disappear.

414
00:22:12,800 --> 00:22:16,700
But we'll certainly evolved.
I would like to be in the favor

415
00:22:16,700 --> 00:22:18,800
of advertisers.
Absolutely.

416
00:22:19,100 --> 00:22:22,500
Julie response to question 18.
I wish you all happiness, joy,

417
00:22:22,500 --> 00:22:24,600
peace, and good health, this
holiday season.

418
00:22:24,900 --> 00:22:27,600
And for those, for whom this
time of year is difficult.

419
00:22:27,700 --> 00:22:30,300
I see you and you are in my
heart.

420
00:22:30,300 --> 00:22:32,900
And yeah, Glenn goes, hope you
have a wonderful holiday with

421
00:22:32,900 --> 00:22:34,300
your loved ones.
Julie goes.

422
00:22:34,300 --> 00:22:36,800
Thank you, wishing you the same.
So yeah, this is pretty much

423
00:22:36,800 --> 00:22:40,200
less wish happiness to all of us
during Brown response to this

424
00:22:40,200 --> 00:22:43,400
question 7 that people stop
giving away free works like

425
00:22:43,400 --> 00:22:46,800
account, reviews and audits,
everyone raises their rates.

426
00:22:47,100 --> 00:22:50,400
There is a reason why the it's
don't work for free.

427
00:22:50,400 --> 00:22:52,700
Yeah.
When Brown responds more people

428
00:22:52,700 --> 00:22:56,000
join in throughout the year and
see how amazing it is.

429
00:22:56,000 --> 00:22:59,600
So that's the wish for the
community that we continue to

430
00:22:59,800 --> 00:23:03,200
grow last two actor.
A Lawrence admitted, maybe

431
00:23:03,200 --> 00:23:05,500
Melissa.
I would love to her it and their

432
00:23:05,800 --> 00:23:07,500
Lords goes.
As you get older, you really

433
00:23:07,500 --> 00:23:10,600
appreciate a healthy body.
My wish is for folks to be

434
00:23:10,600 --> 00:23:14,000
healthy and happy this way.
They can join in on the weekly

435
00:23:14,000 --> 00:23:17,500
discussions where we all try and
help each other grow.

436
00:23:17,800 --> 00:23:21,700
Whether that is being a Building
a big agency, active response.

437
00:23:21,700 --> 00:23:24,300
Be awesome, guys.
You are all amazing.

438
00:23:24,400 --> 00:23:28,100
I wish that all of you get what
you are trying to achieve, maybe

439
00:23:28,100 --> 00:23:32,500
happiness, love family, friends,
wealth skills, life or whatever.

440
00:23:32,700 --> 00:23:36,000
Yes, may we all achieve that
Melissa goes.

441
00:23:36,000 --> 00:23:40,100
Wishing all of my PPC chat, a
wonderful holiday with great

442
00:23:40,400 --> 00:23:42,300
rowers.
I'm just wishing you all a

443
00:23:42,300 --> 00:23:44,700
wonderful holiday.
Don't worry about the world, as

444
00:23:44,700 --> 00:23:48,400
don't worry about the budget
trust that your 12 months of

445
00:23:48,400 --> 00:23:49,400
hard work.
Work.

446
00:23:49,400 --> 00:23:52,900
You know, you trust that that
has paid off you deserve the one

447
00:23:52,900 --> 00:23:56,700
or two weeks that you're going
to get off and yeah, eat as many

448
00:23:56,900 --> 00:23:59,800
delicious foods that you like
whether it's turkey or not

449
00:23:59,800 --> 00:24:04,000
turkey or pudding or roast
potatoes parsnips, and all that

450
00:24:04,000 --> 00:24:06,100
kind of trimmings, I'm gonna
love that.

451
00:24:06,100 --> 00:24:08,500
So yeah, thank you for joining
us in 2022.

452
00:24:08,500 --> 00:24:11,400
Hope you have a fantastic
holiday and will speak to you.

453
00:24:11,400 --> 00:24:16,500
And not next week will be
speaking to you in 2023, but

454
00:24:16,500 --> 00:24:18,900
yeah, my usual sign of, I hope
you've taken some great tips.

455
00:24:19,100 --> 00:24:22,500
Ways in terms of this format of
the chat, this will be our last

456
00:24:22,500 --> 00:24:26,900
one of the year, but we will be
having the Twitter spaces chat

457
00:24:26,900 --> 00:24:29,900
on Thursday.
So, yeah, join us for that, two

458
00:24:29,900 --> 00:24:32,200
days before Christmas.
If you want to chat about your

459
00:24:32,200 --> 00:24:36,000
wish list with the I did you lie
will be on there as well, for

460
00:24:36,000 --> 00:24:38,900
any feedback about the podcast
or some corrections.

461
00:24:38,900 --> 00:24:41,100
And anything that has been said,
do you get in touch with me?

462
00:24:41,100 --> 00:24:44,400
My DMs are tentatively open.
No sales.

463
00:24:44,400 --> 00:24:46,700
DMS, please.
But yeah, get in touch with me

464
00:24:46,700 --> 00:24:49,900
on at the marketing and you Or
LinkedIn.

465
00:24:49,900 --> 00:24:52,800
You know, just contact me on a
Pneumatic bowler, but we also

466
00:24:52,800 --> 00:24:56,500
have the PPC chat Roundup
podcast groups to join us there

467
00:24:56,500 --> 00:24:59,400
as well for any long standing on
short-term members.

468
00:24:59,400 --> 00:25:01,800
Yeah, will be great to get a
review or rating.

469
00:25:02,000 --> 00:25:07,300
Just go to link tree.com /p PC,
chat on this called Roundup and

470
00:25:07,300 --> 00:25:11,100
on the likes of Spotify, it
takes seconds to leave a rating.

471
00:25:11,400 --> 00:25:14,200
Finally, remember for your
campaigns and businesses to

472
00:25:14,200 --> 00:25:16,300
Glide smoothly.
There's a lot of hard work

473
00:25:16,500 --> 00:25:20,200
needed beneath the surface.
So So yeah, keep your swans

474
00:25:20,200 --> 00:25:23,700
kicking, but maybe not so much
in the coming couple of weeks,

475
00:25:23,900 --> 00:25:28,200
enjoy your couple of weeks of
Holiday by and speak to you in

476
00:25:28,200 --> 00:25:28,900
the new year.