Aug. 24, 2022

EP219 - PPC for Lead Gen, What is working, What is not working

EP219 - PPC for Lead Gen, What is working, What is not working

#ppcchat Twitter discussion that runs on Tuesdays at 5pm GMT - Led by Julie Bacchini (@NeptuneMoon)


Q1 If you are doing PPC for lead generation (lead gen) for what industry or industries are you currently advertising?

Q2 Which advertising platform(s) are you currently using for your lead gen PPC? Does it vary at all by industry? (Performance on the platforms will be the next Q).

Q3 Which platforms are having the most success for your lead gen PPC efforts currently? Is this different from where you have found success in the past?

Q4 What is your biggest challenge in lead gen PPC right now? Has it changed in the last 6 to 12 months?

Q5 Have you tried anything new lately or are you wanting to try anything new for your lead gen PPC accounts?


1
00:00:01,000 --> 00:00:04,100
Hello, and welcome to this
week's episode of the PPC, chat

2
00:00:04,100 --> 00:00:06,100
Roundup.
And today's episode, we have

3
00:00:06,100 --> 00:00:09,200
Julie taken us on another great
topic that we are going to be

4
00:00:09,200 --> 00:00:13,800
talking about PPC, for lead-gen,
what's working and what's not.

5
00:00:13,800 --> 00:00:16,300
And I think this is a really
nice one because you know

6
00:00:16,300 --> 00:00:20,100
everything can be focused on
e-commerce and you know, revenue

7
00:00:20,100 --> 00:00:23,800
and return an ad spend.
But sometimes a lot of the times

8
00:00:23,800 --> 00:00:27,800
lead gen is also an important
part of a journey and trying to,

9
00:00:28,300 --> 00:00:30,300
you know what?
That quality.

10
00:00:30,900 --> 00:00:33,800
Is and driving clicks.
The right clicks does going to

11
00:00:33,800 --> 00:00:39,100
lead to a quality, you know form
fill or quality person calling

12
00:00:39,100 --> 00:00:43,000
through, you know because the
actually the moment of actually

13
00:00:43,000 --> 00:00:45,600
generating the revenue cannot be
on the site.

14
00:00:45,600 --> 00:00:49,000
If for someone like myself who
also you know there's always

15
00:00:49,000 --> 00:00:52,200
trying to push for subscribers.
This kind of this kind of

16
00:00:52,200 --> 00:00:55,000
strategy is going to be really
great for me knowing that I like

17
00:00:55,000 --> 00:00:58,400
the best strategy for lead gen
because I have a newsletter and

18
00:00:58,400 --> 00:01:00,500
yeah I tried to do a lead gen
camp.

19
00:01:00,600 --> 00:01:03,700
Pain on Facebook especially
wonder why they were going to go

20
00:01:03,700 --> 00:01:06,200
into the territory of Facebook
because I wasn't able to join

21
00:01:06,200 --> 00:01:08,800
unfortunate because it was
back-to-back meetings earlier on

22
00:01:08,800 --> 00:01:11,600
today.
But anyway excited to hear what

23
00:01:11,600 --> 00:01:14,000
the experts have to say.
Because yeah, this is going to

24
00:01:14,000 --> 00:01:16,900
be brand new to me and it is, it
is going to be for you.

25
00:01:16,900 --> 00:01:20,200
So, yeah, hope you enjoy and
hope we enjoy together.

26
00:01:29,000 --> 00:01:32,600
Hello and a warm, welcome to
this episode of the PPC chat

27
00:01:32,600 --> 00:01:35,800
round up a podcast where I round
up the Twitter discussion that

28
00:01:35,800 --> 00:01:39,400
happens on Tuesdays at 5 p.m.
GMT or 5 p.m.

29
00:01:39,600 --> 00:01:42,200
BST at the moment.
The British summer time.

30
00:01:42,500 --> 00:01:45,100
Yeah, I'm your host annual.
And I'm recording from my lovely

31
00:01:45,100 --> 00:01:48,300
Studio here in London UK.
And I use this platform to

32
00:01:48,300 --> 00:01:52,100
share, not just expert, but also
my tidy has and considered best

33
00:01:52,100 --> 00:01:55,400
practices about paid media and
the direction, the digital

34
00:01:55,400 --> 00:01:59,200
industry is going in.
The direction is ever evolving

35
00:01:59,200 --> 00:02:04,400
to update by Google per month.
Something always to discuss.

36
00:02:04,700 --> 00:02:07,200
So yeah.
So if you want to get up to date

37
00:02:07,200 --> 00:02:09,100
with that.
If you want to keep up to date

38
00:02:09,300 --> 00:02:12,000
with my tips and tricks in the
industry, and get the latest on

39
00:02:12,000 --> 00:02:14,700
the podcast that has been called
your go to if you don't make it

40
00:02:14,700 --> 00:02:18,200
to the PPC chat live discussions
and even if you do then like,

41
00:02:18,200 --> 00:02:21,900
follow share and retweets on,
that's Twitter with my handle,

42
00:02:21,900 --> 00:02:24,900
the marketing on you, or join us
on our LinkedIn group.

43
00:02:24,900 --> 00:02:28,100
PPC, chat, Roundup, or if you're
on Instagram, why don't you

44
00:02:28,108 --> 00:02:32,000
check us out, at PPC, chat
underscore Round Up to get

45
00:02:32,000 --> 00:02:35,000
quotes and Snippets from our
previous episodes.

46
00:02:35,300 --> 00:02:38,900
So we have Julie bikini again
leading us on another great

47
00:02:38,900 --> 00:02:40,500
topic.
As I mentioned earlier on, we're

48
00:02:40,500 --> 00:02:44,900
going to be talking about PPC
for lead gen and yeah.

49
00:02:44,900 --> 00:02:47,200
What working?
What's not working?

50
00:02:47,700 --> 00:02:50,700
And also seeing the card types
of lead, Jen's going to be seen

51
00:02:50,800 --> 00:02:53,700
What our clients are working on,
whether how many of them are

52
00:02:53,700 --> 00:02:56,700
working on lead-gen, that's or
definitely going to decide who

53
00:02:56,700 --> 00:02:58,600
joins today and who's going to
be lacking.

54
00:02:58,900 --> 00:03:00,100
Before we get into the
questions.

55
00:03:00,100 --> 00:03:03,900
I'm going to mention like
Julie's, PSA, which is before we

56
00:03:03,900 --> 00:03:07,900
get to questions, this chat is
intended for PPC, Professionals

57
00:03:07,900 --> 00:03:10,300
of all levels.
So if you have something you

58
00:03:10,300 --> 00:03:13,900
want to share, please, do we are
a friendly and supportive

59
00:03:13,900 --> 00:03:15,900
Community.
Please don't be afraid to

60
00:03:15,900 --> 00:03:18,500
participate.
Lurkers and podcast listeners.

61
00:03:18,500 --> 00:03:22,000
Of course, of course, always
He's welcome to.

62
00:03:22,000 --> 00:03:24,700
Yes.
Thank you for joining us today.

63
00:03:25,100 --> 00:03:27,700
I'll quickly do a roll call of
you know who we haven't got

64
00:03:27,700 --> 00:03:30,600
Julie advice because yeah,
she--of course, she welcomes us

65
00:03:30,600 --> 00:03:33,600
and says hello to everybody.
Julie advice joins us, Lawrence

66
00:03:33,600 --> 00:03:36,300
chases.
Well as a mallee, Fowler Curt

67
00:03:36,300 --> 00:03:40,000
Hennig de as well and Diana
Alina as well.

68
00:03:40,000 --> 00:03:44,100
Joins us and Harrison Jay Happ
champs-elysees went to and

69
00:03:44,100 --> 00:03:47,200
Chantal a Ashton Clark, one of
my new favorites are meaner

70
00:03:47,200 --> 00:03:50,600
Farid and love to see how
because she's part of our women

71
00:03:50,600 --> 00:03:54,500
in PPC group, and for all the
women listening on this podcast,

72
00:03:54,500 --> 00:03:58,100
please join our women in PPC
slack if you want to know how

73
00:03:58,100 --> 00:04:02,100
just DM me, I would be happy to
share that link with you as low

74
00:04:02,100 --> 00:04:07,900
as well as Glenn Smith Lake
smartly joining us today as

75
00:04:07,900 --> 00:04:09,800
well.
So yeah, let's get into question

76
00:04:09,800 --> 00:04:12,300
one.
Julie asks if you are doing PPC

77
00:04:12,300 --> 00:04:16,300
for lead-gen for what industry
or Industries are you currently

78
00:04:16,300 --> 00:04:18,800
advertising?
Yeah we then have a card

79
00:04:18,800 --> 00:04:20,700
hanniger responding to in
currently Lon.

80
00:04:20,899 --> 00:04:25,300
Just Industries property
management and yeah Molly goes

81
00:04:25,300 --> 00:04:29,100
this chat Is My Jam.
She does Health Services HVAC

82
00:04:29,200 --> 00:04:33,900
trauma scene, clean-up, dumpster
rental, window-washing dentists

83
00:04:33,900 --> 00:04:37,300
and Coring and drilling Concrete
Plus more.

84
00:04:37,300 --> 00:04:41,100
I can't immediately recall.
Those are some very like random

85
00:04:41,100 --> 00:04:44,200
out there Industries.
I glove are in this chant

86
00:04:44,200 --> 00:04:48,100
because you realize how many
Industries and how many loads of

87
00:04:48,108 --> 00:04:50,400
different kind of local
companies and local.

88
00:04:50,800 --> 00:04:53,700
Businesses will need paid search
and its really nice to see the

89
00:04:53,700 --> 00:04:57,900
kind of local services that also
used paid search because why not

90
00:04:57,900 --> 00:05:02,000
their customers on Google Diana.
Lee knows will response question

91
00:05:02,000 --> 00:05:06,000
one saying I currently do
in-house PPC for a SAS Julie

92
00:05:06,000 --> 00:05:08,300
goes education.
And what I'll put under the

93
00:05:08,300 --> 00:05:11,500
umbrella of Business Services on
my lead gen clients.

94
00:05:11,500 --> 00:05:14,200
Right now, Julie advice goes not
much at all.

95
00:05:14,200 --> 00:05:18,300
We track rebate, forms likely,
Jen, but it's not used in the

96
00:05:18,308 --> 00:05:21,400
same way.
And Lead would be put into CRM

97
00:05:21,400 --> 00:05:24,000
and acted on.
She continues in the past.

98
00:05:24,000 --> 00:05:26,300
I've used it for travel
Harrison, Jay.

99
00:05:26,300 --> 00:05:28,700
Happ responsive, I'm currently
doing lead-gen.

100
00:05:28,700 --> 00:05:32,600
Work in healthcare Finance,
construction, B2B software,

101
00:05:32,600 --> 00:05:35,000
landscaping, and Commercial
Furniture.

102
00:05:35,000 --> 00:05:37,400
Just realized.
I'm all over the place.

103
00:05:37,400 --> 00:05:40,800
Yes, you are America's best way
to be a bit more recession,

104
00:05:40,800 --> 00:05:44,000
pandemic world, and world event
proof.

105
00:05:44,000 --> 00:05:46,500
That's a great Point.
Harrison goes, I worked for an

106
00:05:46,500 --> 00:05:49,000
agency.
That was overwhelming.

107
00:05:49,200 --> 00:05:52,600
Real estate prior.
To 2007-2008.

108
00:05:52,700 --> 00:05:55,900
They almost got wiped out when
the economy crashed?

109
00:05:55,900 --> 00:05:58,300
Yes.
So, don't put all your eggs in

110
00:05:58,300 --> 00:06:01,100
one industry basket.
I think is what they're trying

111
00:06:01,100 --> 00:06:02,800
to say, which I totally agree
with.

112
00:06:03,100 --> 00:06:06,000
Lawrence Chase goes, yes,
medical is my biggest one.

113
00:06:06,000 --> 00:06:09,400
But also travel Auto and
property malygos.

114
00:06:09,400 --> 00:06:12,500
Hello, personalized advertising
in health care policy?

115
00:06:12,900 --> 00:06:15,400
Yes, Lawrence girls.
And whether hospital or even

116
00:06:15,400 --> 00:06:19,500
Dental, there are lots of rules.
A lot of Veterinary companies

117
00:06:19,500 --> 00:06:23,400
are also very Active about
privacy even without the same

118
00:06:23,700 --> 00:06:26,500
rules and they act and clock as
well.

119
00:06:26,500 --> 00:06:29,500
Response saying, currently
managing clients across a pretty

120
00:06:29,500 --> 00:06:32,800
wide range of Industries,
including Financial Services

121
00:06:32,800 --> 00:06:36,700
construction, real estate and
commercial food and beverage,

122
00:06:36,700 --> 00:06:39,900
Sean, any response, A Little Bit
of Everything, Medical cause

123
00:06:40,200 --> 00:06:42,400
conferences, medical calls, and
conferences.

124
00:06:42,800 --> 00:06:45,300
I need to have a chat about the
conference's one.

125
00:06:45,300 --> 00:06:49,100
I am going to be listening to
this chat, very intently,

126
00:06:49,100 --> 00:06:51,800
especially with Sean's answer.
Has Miley read.

127
00:06:51,800 --> 00:06:54,800
I read that as one thing Medical
Care conferences.

128
00:06:54,800 --> 00:06:59,600
So ambulance events, no Sean
goes strictly, ambulance and

129
00:06:59,600 --> 00:07:03,600
help mobile conferences.
Very nice, very nice indeed.

130
00:07:04,100 --> 00:07:07,100
I remain a response in
technology industry, providing

131
00:07:07,100 --> 00:07:10,800
business tech services, and
solutions like application,

132
00:07:10,800 --> 00:07:14,500
development, security,
intelligent, automation, Etc.

133
00:07:14,500 --> 00:07:18,300
We are now diving into account
based marketing and need to

134
00:07:18,300 --> 00:07:21,400
generate lead based on ABM.
Strategy.

135
00:07:21,400 --> 00:07:24,500
Glen response to question once
and currently technology and be

136
00:07:24,500 --> 00:07:28,000
to be manufactured goods.
Julie then takes us on to

137
00:07:28,000 --> 00:07:30,600
question 2 saying, which
advertising platforms are you

138
00:07:30,600 --> 00:07:34,700
currently using for your lead
gen PPC, does it vary At All by

139
00:07:34,700 --> 00:07:37,200
industry performance?
On the platforms will be the

140
00:07:37,200 --> 00:07:40,900
next question.
Roscoe's, our Max spent is with

141
00:07:40,900 --> 00:07:43,900
Google but we are spreading out
on almost all channels.

142
00:07:44,100 --> 00:07:47,100
Glenn response saying LinkedIn
is a platform that's common to

143
00:07:47,100 --> 00:07:51,000
all, but one of our clients in
past there's always Has been a

144
00:07:51,008 --> 00:07:54,200
bit of Twitter Cora for lead gen
Coral.

145
00:07:54,200 --> 00:07:55,400
Yeah.
Nice I've heard really good

146
00:07:55,400 --> 00:08:00,100
things about Korra for B2B.
Yeah, Jay goes, I sometimes feel

147
00:08:00,100 --> 00:08:04,000
like Korra is some kind of weird
best-kept, CPC secret.

148
00:08:04,000 --> 00:08:06,800
If you want to reach the people
who bring the options to the

149
00:08:06,800 --> 00:08:10,800
people who make the decisions
Cora should be in your mix.

150
00:08:11,100 --> 00:08:13,600
You want to reach the people who
bring the options to the people

151
00:08:13,600 --> 00:08:16,600
who make the decisions Cora
should be in your mix, shouts

152
00:08:16,600 --> 00:08:19,900
out to JD Potter for getting me
into Coral.

153
00:08:19,900 --> 00:08:24,300
Yeah, JT Is to be like a proper
one of the account, managers at

154
00:08:24,300 --> 00:08:26,800
quora, and he's talked about the
best ways to do it.

155
00:08:26,800 --> 00:08:30,500
So, yeah, I'm sure he still has
some tips as well.

156
00:08:30,500 --> 00:08:33,600
So, yeah, we have then.
Oh, yeah, we've given you a

157
00:08:33,600 --> 00:08:35,500
question to.
So, if you're Logan, then

158
00:08:35,600 --> 00:08:39,200
response to question one saying
to SAS a flooring company on a

159
00:08:39,200 --> 00:08:43,200
solicitor, but mainly SAS, Julia
voice response to question 2 as

160
00:08:43,200 --> 00:08:45,900
well only, of course, mainly
Google, Microsoft metal,

161
00:08:45,900 --> 00:08:48,700
properties, and lots of
awareness media.

162
00:08:49,000 --> 00:08:51,900
Cloud goes, do you personally
work on On all those platforms

163
00:08:51,900 --> 00:08:55,300
or is that what your team works
on and delivers goes?

164
00:08:55,300 --> 00:08:57,700
Yeah, what a great question.
My team works on these but I'm

165
00:08:57,700 --> 00:09:00,900
in there quite a bit.
I do leave the TV and billboard

166
00:09:00,900 --> 00:09:03,900
buying so, the experts though
card goes.

167
00:09:03,900 --> 00:09:05,000
Interesting.
Yeah.

168
00:09:05,000 --> 00:09:08,400
And Julia goes there's too many
programs for me to do everything

169
00:09:08,400 --> 00:09:11,100
but I do.
I do need to keep my platform

170
00:09:11,100 --> 00:09:14,600
knowledge up.
Delegation is a skillet short is

171
00:09:15,000 --> 00:09:16,100
cut goes.
I always find it.

172
00:09:16,100 --> 00:09:18,900
Good to know, at least a bit
about other platforms even

173
00:09:18,900 --> 00:09:22,400
offline gives fantastic.
Text delegation is indeed a

174
00:09:22,400 --> 00:09:25,700
skill Universe goes, right?
Very helpful to know that The

175
00:09:25,700 --> 00:09:29,200
Tick-Tock Pinterest LinkedIn
platform looks like, even if

176
00:09:29,200 --> 00:09:32,900
you're mainly in a different
medium and then we have Curt

177
00:09:32,900 --> 00:09:35,600
Hennig a respondents question to
saying, good old Google ads,

178
00:09:35,600 --> 00:09:38,000
Microsoft ads.
I'll throw in YouTube as well

179
00:09:38,300 --> 00:09:41,400
even though it's part of the
Google app platform.

180
00:09:41,600 --> 00:09:43,900
And then we have fashion clock
responded, to question to say,

181
00:09:43,900 --> 00:09:46,900
mainly using Google ads with
some Microsoft advertising and

182
00:09:46,900 --> 00:09:50,600
Linkedin ads mixed in as well,
doesn't vary as much.

183
00:09:50,700 --> 00:09:54,700
By industry, always down to test
a new platform, but mostly

184
00:09:54,700 --> 00:09:58,600
depends on if the client has
enough budget and it's in our

185
00:09:58,600 --> 00:10:02,300
scope of work Julius well, so
response to question 2, saying,

186
00:10:02,300 --> 00:10:05,900
I'm heavily in Google ads with
some Microsoft ads at the

187
00:10:05,900 --> 00:10:10,100
moment, always working to expand
being talking LinkedIn, Twitter

188
00:10:10,100 --> 00:10:13,900
and Cora for a while.
But getting green light is slow

189
00:10:13,900 --> 00:10:15,000
right now.
Oh yeah.

190
00:10:15,000 --> 00:10:18,100
Microsoft ads.
How soon I forget, Julie, go.

191
00:10:18,100 --> 00:10:20,600
Sadly, that could probably be
there.

192
00:10:20,800 --> 00:10:26,000
Hag lighthouse in I forget Lord
calling in everybody glamorous.

193
00:10:26,000 --> 00:10:29,500
Phones are made a response in
Google search and Linkedin the

194
00:10:29,600 --> 00:10:33,400
Diana Elena response.
I do advertise on Google ads

195
00:10:33,400 --> 00:10:36,200
where most of the budget is
spent followed by LinkedIn.

196
00:10:36,200 --> 00:10:41,000
Instagram pic Bing Pinterest,
Twitter Tick-Tock and capped era

197
00:10:41,200 --> 00:10:45,100
in the recent past we also used
to advertise on quora and Reddit

198
00:10:45,200 --> 00:10:49,600
but due to low performance we
decided to pose ads Harrison

199
00:10:49,600 --> 00:10:52,400
goes 0 cap.
Interesting, do you see results

200
00:10:52,400 --> 00:10:54,600
there?
I've never tried that, but I do

201
00:10:54,600 --> 00:10:57,300
have a client in the software
World down ago.

202
00:10:57,300 --> 00:11:01,000
We invest very few dollars.
Have dust volume of leads is low

203
00:11:01,000 --> 00:11:04,700
as well but depending on the
month we see up to 10 trials

204
00:11:04,700 --> 00:11:08,300
hair at decent cost, you can
give it a try and also start

205
00:11:08,300 --> 00:11:12,300
slow and see how that goes for
your brand.

206
00:11:12,500 --> 00:11:15,100
So figures agreed.
We see low volumes that we

207
00:11:15,100 --> 00:11:19,400
aren't spending a huge amount so
we can't complain too much.

208
00:11:19,700 --> 00:11:22,900
There seems to be more
Competition on the recently

209
00:11:22,900 --> 00:11:27,100
though and Reserve prices have
increased so CPA is steadily

210
00:11:27,100 --> 00:11:28,800
Rising.
That sounds interesting.

211
00:11:28,800 --> 00:11:33,600
I might have to do that and I
malygos we are response question

212
00:11:33,600 --> 00:11:37,000
to saying Google ads with a hit
of Microsoft ads.

213
00:11:37,000 --> 00:11:41,300
In terms of non-paid, there's a
lot of push for SEO and content

214
00:11:41,300 --> 00:11:43,600
as well.
Lawrence taste response saying

215
00:11:43,600 --> 00:11:47,100
Omni for life, under in response
to question 2, there is no one

216
00:11:47,100 --> 00:11:50,300
channel really anymore.
We try and test them all and put

217
00:11:50,300 --> 00:11:52,100
the dough.
Dollars where we see the best

218
00:11:52,100 --> 00:11:54,700
returns LinkedIn, Google,
Microsoft and meta.

219
00:11:55,100 --> 00:11:58,300
All the big ones though.
Roscoe's, if you don't test and

220
00:11:58,300 --> 00:12:01,500
are not agile and Nimble, you
are done and dusted in this

221
00:12:01,500 --> 00:12:05,900
industry, change and learning
other only constants that we

222
00:12:05,900 --> 00:12:08,500
have.
And we have yeah, malagant

223
00:12:08,500 --> 00:12:12,200
continue Hans question to saying
generally, do not do other

224
00:12:12,200 --> 00:12:15,100
platforms with my clients,
especially not matter with the

225
00:12:15,100 --> 00:12:18,900
budget or Industries.
I work with Sheila on early

226
00:12:18,900 --> 00:12:21,900
response to question twos.
As I say, I am excited for his

227
00:12:21,900 --> 00:12:24,400
answer.
Considering he does events

228
00:12:24,400 --> 00:12:27,500
varies by industries by have
campaigned on Google Bing

229
00:12:27,500 --> 00:12:30,700
YouTube, LinkedIn, and Facebook,
I'm thinking of doing some

230
00:12:30,700 --> 00:12:34,500
boosting campaigns for my
conference and they are boosting

231
00:12:34,500 --> 00:12:37,500
like the events got.
So yeah, that I've pushed it up,

232
00:12:37,500 --> 00:12:41,100
Jude 20, September 29th.
We've got the next event at the

233
00:12:41,108 --> 00:12:44,900
shot, the tallest building in
London, 15 pounds of tickets.

234
00:12:44,900 --> 00:12:48,000
The cheapest you will find for
any event.

235
00:12:48,000 --> 00:12:52,800
Anyway, I digress.
We then have Circle again

236
00:12:52,800 --> 00:12:55,000
responding to question 2 saying
for SAS clients.

237
00:12:55,000 --> 00:12:57,300
It's usually both Google and
Microsoft.

238
00:12:57,300 --> 00:13:02,000
It's a specific platform such as
capture and G2 added to my mix

239
00:13:02,000 --> 00:13:07,000
to trust, which it who is the
CEO of victress agency based out

240
00:13:07,000 --> 00:13:11,200
in Sheffield who are sponsoring
PVC live UK for the second event

241
00:13:11,200 --> 00:13:12,700
at the show.
I'm so excited.

242
00:13:12,800 --> 00:13:14,000
She goes.
Yeah, yeah.

243
00:13:14,000 --> 00:13:18,200
So if he goes M, also covers
LinkedIn for a lot of our SAS

244
00:13:18,200 --> 00:13:22,100
client to save and continue For
our nonce, ask lines.

245
00:13:22,100 --> 00:13:26,500
They mainly stick to Google ads
and Facebook and then Rush then

246
00:13:26,500 --> 00:13:27,800
goes on to answer, question
Tuesday.

247
00:13:27,800 --> 00:13:32,100
And our Max band is with Google
but we are spread out on almost

248
00:13:32,100 --> 00:13:34,800
all channels.
Then Julie takes us on to

249
00:13:34,800 --> 00:13:37,700
question 3 saying, which
platforms are having the most

250
00:13:37,700 --> 00:13:41,600
success for your lead gen PPC.
Efforts currently Is this

251
00:13:41,600 --> 00:13:45,600
different from where you have
found success in the past.

252
00:13:45,900 --> 00:13:49,100
I mean a response always been
Google search when compared to

253
00:13:49,100 --> 00:13:52,000
LinkedIn but this Does not mean
Google ads.

254
00:13:52,000 --> 00:13:55,400
Does a good job for B2B
advertisers LinkedIn.

255
00:13:55,400 --> 00:13:59,700
Needs to be needs to up its game
by positioning the platform as a

256
00:13:59,700 --> 00:14:02,900
problem.
Solver for B2B pain points than

257
00:14:02,900 --> 00:14:05,400
just hiring a recruiting Julie
response.

258
00:14:05,400 --> 00:14:09,300
We have talked about, we have
talked before about how much

259
00:14:09,300 --> 00:14:12,600
opportunity opportunity, there
is for LinkedIn and then

260
00:14:12,600 --> 00:14:16,600
continue to very slow rolling.
Slowly rolling things out.

261
00:14:16,600 --> 00:14:19,500
It's a bit baffling.
I mean it goes.

262
00:14:19,500 --> 00:14:22,500
I know when I talk to Family and
friends, who are decision makers

263
00:14:22,500 --> 00:14:26,400
in B2B space, they go to Google
to find solutions to their be

264
00:14:26,400 --> 00:14:29,000
any problems.
The perception is your high on

265
00:14:29,000 --> 00:14:31,200
LinkedIn.
That platform should become

266
00:14:31,200 --> 00:14:35,000
perfect for B2B because because
of the Sue relevant information

267
00:14:35,400 --> 00:14:38,700
on the company.
And we have digital Sam.

268
00:14:38,700 --> 00:14:43,500
I am responding to question 2
saying really runs the gamut

269
00:14:43,500 --> 00:14:47,300
primarily Google search and
Linkedin, but I had a ton of

270
00:14:47,300 --> 00:14:50,100
success recently with metal lead
forms.

271
00:14:50,100 --> 00:14:52,500
Go figure.
Figure in the Health Care Plus

272
00:14:52,500 --> 00:14:55,500
recruiting space Metal.
He's forms.

273
00:14:55,500 --> 00:14:58,500
How interesting a malygos how's
the quality of those leads?

274
00:14:58,500 --> 00:15:01,800
I remember a few years ago, they
were just total crap.

275
00:15:01,900 --> 00:15:05,500
So I'm goes roughly 3 and 10 are
qualified but we're averaging a

276
00:15:05,500 --> 00:15:09,900
CPL of around 18 dollars over
the past two months.

277
00:15:10,200 --> 00:15:14,800
So a CP quality, lead of $54 is
very reasonable.

278
00:15:14,800 --> 00:15:19,500
Just more legwork on the clients
and in terms of Outreach, he

279
00:15:19,500 --> 00:15:22,600
continues of the I do we
schedule interviews with one

280
00:15:22,600 --> 00:15:25,900
plus we hire one in five of the
scheduled interviews.

281
00:15:25,900 --> 00:15:29,000
So we're looking at a cost per
hire of nine hundred and four

282
00:15:29,200 --> 00:15:33,000
dollars, which is one-tenth the
recruiter or agency fee.

283
00:15:33,300 --> 00:15:36,300
We'd pay.
That's a way to look at it

284
00:15:36,300 --> 00:15:39,600
relative, it's all about
relative to what else you'd pay

285
00:15:39,600 --> 00:15:43,200
out there and compared to what
you'd pay for a recruiter?

286
00:15:43,200 --> 00:15:45,700
Yeah, that is a very good cost
per hire.

287
00:15:46,200 --> 00:15:48,200
And then, we have a mallee
responded to question three

288
00:15:48,200 --> 00:15:50,400
saying, depending on your
definition of success go.

289
00:15:50,600 --> 00:15:53,600
Google search, if we are looking
at least quality and volume,

290
00:15:53,600 --> 00:15:56,900
although I found across the
board with Target CPA.

291
00:15:56,900 --> 00:16:01,100
These days, my cpcs are becoming
almost unmanageable.

292
00:16:01,100 --> 00:16:05,800
So I've gone back to Max clicks
on occasion with hot weather and

293
00:16:05,800 --> 00:16:07,100
have Rush responding to
question.

294
00:16:07,100 --> 00:16:10,400
Three, seen success has a very
different definition for us.

295
00:16:10,700 --> 00:16:15,200
Our success may not be a success
for our platforms and may not

296
00:16:15,200 --> 00:16:18,800
translate to success.
For our users, we have positive

297
00:16:18,800 --> 00:16:22,600
reviews and experiences.
People come from such and

298
00:16:22,600 --> 00:16:26,500
targeted, look-alike, social or
display audiences.

299
00:16:27,100 --> 00:16:29,400
And then, we have shown earlier
responding to question. 3

300
00:16:29,400 --> 00:16:32,100
saying, Google being a LinkedIn.
Depends on ad.

301
00:16:32,100 --> 00:16:36,600
Type leads ads, have been good
recently, typically do the best

302
00:16:36,600 --> 00:16:40,400
in terms of CPA, but Google
always has the upper hand.

303
00:16:40,400 --> 00:16:44,600
In terms of volume Facebook has
been terrible recently.

304
00:16:44,600 --> 00:16:47,300
I don't want to hear that.
I feel it's the was going to be

305
00:16:47,300 --> 00:16:50,500
my easy go to.
But yeah maybe not you device.

306
00:16:50,600 --> 00:16:54,700
Wants to question a three going
such as definitely it for us.

307
00:16:54,700 --> 00:16:58,800
But again, awareness media will
get people searching outside of

308
00:16:58,800 --> 00:17:02,500
Google and Microsoft.
Twitter does quite well for B2B

309
00:17:02,500 --> 00:17:07,099
leads and Instagram did very
well in terms of travel leads.

310
00:17:07,099 --> 00:17:10,300
Interesting, so if it goes on to
answer question 3, as well as in

311
00:17:10,300 --> 00:17:12,200
Google, has always been the best
converter.

312
00:17:12,200 --> 00:17:16,099
But Microsoft has been quickly,
gaining much more traction over

313
00:17:16,099 --> 00:17:19,900
the past six to eight months.
I'm glad to see this shift for

314
00:17:19,900 --> 00:17:24,400
our As the conversions are
typically much cheaper and have

315
00:17:24,400 --> 00:17:28,500
a higher lead to sail rate, Curt
Hennig a response to question.

316
00:17:28,500 --> 00:17:32,800
Three seeing Google ads as it's
the quickest and most efficient

317
00:17:32,800 --> 00:17:37,300
to scale with multi-location.
Lead generation, Ashton clogged

318
00:17:37,300 --> 00:17:40,000
response, question 3, as well as
in Google ads has consistently

319
00:17:40,000 --> 00:17:43,500
been the top performer for
several years now, Microsoft has

320
00:17:43,500 --> 00:17:47,400
done well to especially in terms
of CPA because it's generally

321
00:17:47,400 --> 00:17:50,400
generally less expensive than
Google LinkedIn.

322
00:17:50,500 --> 00:17:54,000
Is a mixed bag, but remarketing
has been best.

323
00:17:54,000 --> 00:17:56,000
Interesting, there is Chase
response.

324
00:17:56,000 --> 00:17:59,600
Question 3 seeing very tough
one, as it seems to vary quite a

325
00:17:59,600 --> 00:18:03,500
bit with the right creative, it
really can be any platform.

326
00:18:03,800 --> 00:18:07,100
Google still has the best.
The if you are looking for

327
00:18:07,100 --> 00:18:10,400
Volume Plus quality of leads,
the other platforms, just kind

328
00:18:10,400 --> 00:18:15,100
of skill like Google can today
and then yeah IM Aly response to

329
00:18:15,100 --> 00:18:18,200
question 3, seeing lots of my
clients offer emergency

330
00:18:18,200 --> 00:18:21,700
services.
So part of the Is getting people

331
00:18:21,700 --> 00:18:25,300
to know who they want to call in
an emergency before the

332
00:18:25,300 --> 00:18:30,700
emergency while capturing others
during their emergent search.

333
00:18:30,700 --> 00:18:33,900
And then we have Harrison Jap
responding to Jay Happ even

334
00:18:34,100 --> 00:18:36,400
responding to question three
saying, most of the success I'm

335
00:18:36,400 --> 00:18:39,500
seen in lead-gen right now is on
Google ads.

336
00:18:39,500 --> 00:18:43,300
The other platforms work well
here and there, but most don't

337
00:18:43,300 --> 00:18:47,500
hold up against Google ants.
And we have Julie responded to

338
00:18:47,500 --> 00:18:50,400
question 3 as well as in Google
ads has been a bit all over.

339
00:18:50,500 --> 00:18:52,200
The place for the lead gen
accounts.

340
00:18:52,200 --> 00:18:56,100
I work on over the past year.
It has the most volume, so it

341
00:18:56,100 --> 00:19:00,300
ends up being the top source of
PPC leads, Microsoft when it

342
00:19:00,300 --> 00:19:04,200
hits is great too when it hits,
if it hits a.

343
00:19:04,200 --> 00:19:07,900
Yeah, that's always the question
of their Diana than response to

344
00:19:07,900 --> 00:19:11,600
question 3, saying I see the
most success referring to leads

345
00:19:11,600 --> 00:19:15,600
generated and cost per leads on
Google ads more specifically on

346
00:19:15,600 --> 00:19:19,200
display and Discovery
remarketing search even on

347
00:19:19,200 --> 00:19:23,000
performance Max.
The least on video and we have

348
00:19:23,000 --> 00:19:25,500
another answer to question.
Three from Julie going worth

349
00:19:25,500 --> 00:19:28,700
mentioning here, that search
Google and Microsoft are

350
00:19:28,700 --> 00:19:33,000
capturing demand people only see
search ads, when they sensually

351
00:19:33,000 --> 00:19:37,000
ask for them, other networks
networks, not same Dynamic.

352
00:19:37,000 --> 00:19:40,900
So criteria should be different
in terms of success.

353
00:19:40,900 --> 00:19:42,900
Absolutely true.
That's a good way of putting it.

354
00:19:42,900 --> 00:19:46,200
So, if you're looking goes, if I
have a one dollar for every time

355
00:19:46,200 --> 00:19:50,000
I had to remind the clients do
this again worth mentioning

356
00:19:50,000 --> 00:19:53,700
here, that's Search are
capturing demand people only see

357
00:19:53,700 --> 00:19:57,900
search ads when they essentially
ask a for them so it's needs to

358
00:19:57,900 --> 00:20:01,200
be something that they already
searching for but so basically

359
00:20:01,200 --> 00:20:04,100
paid search does not create
demand.

360
00:20:04,400 --> 00:20:07,400
Dinah continues another on to
question 3, saying next, best

361
00:20:07,400 --> 00:20:10,700
performing channel for our SAS
is Instagram in the past,

362
00:20:10,700 --> 00:20:12,900
remarketing on this platform,
rocked for us.

363
00:20:13,200 --> 00:20:16,100
Now we barely see the same
performance but we have to get

364
00:20:16,100 --> 00:20:19,400
good performance there on very
static ads and unreal with

365
00:20:19,400 --> 00:20:22,300
interest related.
Getting she continues.

366
00:20:22,300 --> 00:20:26,300
LinkedIn also performs great for
us, especially on retargeting,

367
00:20:26,300 --> 00:20:30,000
and for Gathering leads on the
fourth and fifth place, our

368
00:20:30,000 --> 00:20:32,600
Bing.
And surprisingly or not

369
00:20:32,600 --> 00:20:35,700
Pinterest, Julie goes, we could
have a whole chat about the

370
00:20:35,700 --> 00:20:38,300
Myriad of ways.
How clients dropped the ball

371
00:20:38,500 --> 00:20:41,100
with their leads?
And this is yeah, when Julie

372
00:20:41,100 --> 00:20:43,900
invited said, hey teen, do we
likely Jan ads with the form?

373
00:20:43,900 --> 00:20:48,400
Built-in, are we all using
Salesforce or is it low enough

374
00:20:48,400 --> 00:20:50,400
volume that we just manually
pull the forms out?

375
00:20:50,500 --> 00:20:53,500
Out of the platform regularly
malygos, I don't like them

376
00:20:53,500 --> 00:20:56,800
because my clients generally
generally don't do the legwork

377
00:20:56,800 --> 00:21:00,200
on the other side to answer them
fast enough to make them convert

378
00:21:00,200 --> 00:21:03,500
and then you actually goes how
many times declined to drop the

379
00:21:03,500 --> 00:21:04,900
ball.
Am I goes?

380
00:21:04,900 --> 00:21:08,300
And yet when leads drop it,
somehow always ppc's fault.

381
00:21:08,300 --> 00:21:11,300
I said to a client the other day
how do you know it is?

382
00:21:11,300 --> 00:21:14,200
These leads that are lower
quality and they couldn't answer

383
00:21:14,200 --> 00:21:16,700
because they don't know for
sure.

384
00:21:16,900 --> 00:21:20,100
Delivers girls have I got a
program for you will pour a

385
00:21:20,100 --> 00:21:22,100
drink.
One day and I'll take you

386
00:21:22,100 --> 00:21:24,100
through it.
We need to have that on a woman.

387
00:21:24,100 --> 00:21:27,000
In people see chat.
Anyway, civilian goes, there is

388
00:21:27,000 --> 00:21:30,900
a massive problem for us, but we
do try and work with our clients

389
00:21:30,900 --> 00:21:35,400
to have them fed back on lead to
sail rates week on week.

390
00:21:35,400 --> 00:21:38,200
There's much room for
improvement Heather but it's a

391
00:21:38,200 --> 00:21:41,300
tricky one.
When you're not in house Miley

392
00:21:41,300 --> 00:21:44,500
goes in this case, I don't even
know that it's dropping the ball

393
00:21:44,500 --> 00:21:47,200
for me because they are
typically small business owners

394
00:21:47,200 --> 00:21:50,300
without a sales team out in the
field.

395
00:21:50,500 --> 00:21:54,000
And so yeah continue
conversation goes there but that

396
00:21:54,000 --> 00:21:56,700
is a bit of a tangent Army
nothing answers question, 3

397
00:21:56,700 --> 00:22:00,200
saying always been Google search
when compared to LinkedIn, but

398
00:22:00,200 --> 00:22:03,000
this does not mean Google as
does a good job for B2B

399
00:22:03,000 --> 00:22:06,100
advertisers LinkedIn.
Needs to up its game by

400
00:22:06,100 --> 00:22:08,000
positioning the platform as a
problem.

401
00:22:08,000 --> 00:22:13,100
Solver for B2B pain points than
just hiring and recruiting.

402
00:22:13,100 --> 00:22:14,200
Yes.
So yes sir.

403
00:22:14,200 --> 00:22:16,300
That's a repeated answer worth
mentioning.

404
00:22:16,600 --> 00:22:20,300
I'm not going to repeat the
replies to that and we then

405
00:22:20,500 --> 00:22:24,100
Julie take notes on to question.
Forcing, what is your biggest

406
00:22:24,100 --> 00:22:29,200
challenge in lead gen PPC?
Right now has it changed in the

407
00:22:29,200 --> 00:22:34,500
last six to 12 months and I'm
Ali goes one acronym, CPC Rush

408
00:22:34,500 --> 00:22:36,800
goes not a challenge as it is
constant.

409
00:22:36,800 --> 00:22:40,600
Pull and push that is the nature
of the job but sometimes people

410
00:22:40,600 --> 00:22:44,100
do not have the patience to let
time became mature.

411
00:22:44,100 --> 00:22:47,600
The lead is frustrating as hell,
and he continues.

412
00:22:47,600 --> 00:22:49,200
Don't even get me started on
those.

413
00:22:49,200 --> 00:22:51,800
Haha, that is a huge problem.
Problem, every morning, I wake

414
00:22:51,800 --> 00:22:55,700
up and lay in bed thinking, what
new hell got Unleashed on the

415
00:22:55,700 --> 00:22:58,000
marketer.
I mean a response in the long

416
00:22:58,000 --> 00:23:01,300
road from lead-gen to sales and
none of the app platforms.

417
00:23:01,300 --> 00:23:05,000
Cookie policy attribution,
zigzag customer journey, and

418
00:23:05,000 --> 00:23:09,000
Company CRM, segmentation and
proper tagging give credit to

419
00:23:09,000 --> 00:23:12,200
our hard work.
This has not changed in the last

420
00:23:12,300 --> 00:23:15,800
12 months. 12, we have been
managing responded.

421
00:23:15,800 --> 00:23:18,600
Question forcing lead quality
with the expansion of match

422
00:23:18,600 --> 00:23:22,300
types and smart bidding it An
ongoing challenge to ensure

423
00:23:22,500 --> 00:23:26,900
lead, quality remains High
correspond, same P Max, reading

424
00:23:26,900 --> 00:23:30,200
the performance, Max tea, leaves
and aroused question.

425
00:23:30,200 --> 00:23:34,300
For a cigar cigarette spawns,
the in its inability to get

426
00:23:34,300 --> 00:23:36,400
lead.
Nurturing data from the client

427
00:23:36,600 --> 00:23:39,800
or inability to understand how
leads are converted into sales

428
00:23:39,800 --> 00:23:43,100
and also lack of control on ADD
assets.

429
00:23:43,100 --> 00:23:45,800
It's frustrating when there's no
understanding of what

430
00:23:45,800 --> 00:23:47,800
combinations of our essays are
getting me.

431
00:23:47,800 --> 00:23:51,700
My results are essays.
Duty Goes On, Are such a data

432
00:23:51,700 --> 00:23:54,900
black hole.
Yeah, Google need to do better

433
00:23:54,900 --> 00:23:58,600
with that, delivers response,
conversion, volume, these hugely

434
00:23:58,600 --> 00:24:02,300
smart algorithms cannot deal
with less than 30 a month.

435
00:24:02,300 --> 00:24:05,400
That's not how leads work,
Julie, response to question,

436
00:24:05,400 --> 00:24:08,400
forcing Automation and machine
learning struggles with low

437
00:24:08,400 --> 00:24:13,000
conversion, volume campaigns or
account it just does yes.

438
00:24:13,000 --> 00:24:17,000
So much this Harrison goes as
well and then we have to feel

439
00:24:17,000 --> 00:24:19,400
again responded to question.
Forcing for SAS.

440
00:24:19,400 --> 00:24:22,500
I'd say to the anchor.
In competition while it's to be

441
00:24:22,500 --> 00:24:24,400
expected.
As the industry continues to

442
00:24:24,400 --> 00:24:28,600
grow rapidly clients who have
been advertising for a while

443
00:24:28,600 --> 00:24:33,200
struggle to be okay with the
increase in CPC and CPA and she

444
00:24:33,200 --> 00:24:36,300
continues, they wanted the good
old days back and see the

445
00:24:36,300 --> 00:24:40,000
increases as being issues with
the account or management and

446
00:24:40,000 --> 00:24:43,400
nothing to do with the entire
auction process or platform

447
00:24:43,400 --> 00:24:44,800
changes.
Julie goes.

448
00:24:44,800 --> 00:24:47,900
This is a great Point too.
I think clients sometimes just

449
00:24:47,900 --> 00:24:51,800
don't think that another brand.
Could be pushing heavily into

450
00:24:51,800 --> 00:24:54,700
search advertising.
For example, they can be quite

451
00:24:54,700 --> 00:24:58,100
rigid in their competitive
competition ideas.

452
00:24:58,400 --> 00:25:01,400
So if your response, absolutely,
especially when it comes to

453
00:25:01,400 --> 00:25:06,100
keeping up with the New Kids on
the Block Tony's re response,

454
00:25:06,100 --> 00:25:09,700
VC, VC, and their hockey stick
requirements for growth.

455
00:25:09,700 --> 00:25:12,800
Tend to over invest in ads
drives up prices.

456
00:25:13,100 --> 00:25:15,300
Slashed noise for the rest of
the market.

457
00:25:15,500 --> 00:25:20,200
Julie goes, we could do a whole
chat on that topic 2.

458
00:25:20,500 --> 00:25:22,600
So an area as well, goes down
response to question.

459
00:25:22,600 --> 00:25:27,300
Forcing cpcs they are up or seem
to be up on every platform.

460
00:25:27,300 --> 00:25:30,400
So clients are paying more for
every lead.

461
00:25:30,600 --> 00:25:33,200
Rush goes, what's your take on
volume versus quality, poor

462
00:25:33,200 --> 00:25:36,800
quality at lower CBC or good
quality at high CPC.

463
00:25:37,000 --> 00:25:40,000
Sean goes all about quality even
clients that only care about

464
00:25:40,000 --> 00:25:42,300
CPA.
I try to get them to take the

465
00:25:42,300 --> 00:25:45,900
quality side.
Under consideration, Roscoe's,

466
00:25:45,900 --> 00:25:48,600
quality and quantity are
quantity are such a delicate

467
00:25:48,600 --> 00:25:51,300
mix.
I never knew How crazy lead

468
00:25:51,300 --> 00:25:53,700
Jen's is until I got knee-deep
into it.

469
00:25:53,900 --> 00:25:56,200
Julie goes that is really the
root of it.

470
00:25:56,200 --> 00:25:59,000
All, finding a high volume of
quality.

471
00:25:59,000 --> 00:26:03,300
Leads way easier said than done,
I didn't think it can be done.

472
00:26:03,300 --> 00:26:05,600
Rush goes.
I didn't just get my salt and

473
00:26:05,600 --> 00:26:07,800
pepper.
Look, lead-gen, gave it to me.

474
00:26:07,800 --> 00:26:10,500
Might me trying to be funny.
Jesus Christ.

475
00:26:10,500 --> 00:26:13,900
I should stop trying to be funny
and we get to our last question

476
00:26:13,900 --> 00:26:16,200
of the day.
Julie asked takes us on to

477
00:26:16,200 --> 00:26:20,200
question five asking, have you
tried anything new lately, or

478
00:26:20,400 --> 00:26:23,500
You wanting to try anything new
for your lead gen.

479
00:26:23,800 --> 00:26:26,900
PPC accounts Diner response to
question.

480
00:26:26,900 --> 00:26:30,900
Five saying we plan on testing
DV 360 and Spotify in the next

481
00:26:30,900 --> 00:26:33,400
quarter.
Ashton clock, responds saying

482
00:26:33,400 --> 00:26:36,600
performance, Max is the main
one, we're seeing good results

483
00:26:36,600 --> 00:26:40,600
for b2c lead gen client.
So I'm intrigued about testing

484
00:26:40,600 --> 00:26:43,800
in other accounts.
Now, also leaning into more

485
00:26:43,800 --> 00:26:47,300
campaign or ad group
consolidation to account for the

486
00:26:47,300 --> 00:26:50,300
changes in matching Ashton
continues.

487
00:26:50,400 --> 00:26:53,500
We've also seen good results on
Spotify for an e-commerce

488
00:26:53,500 --> 00:26:55,500
client.
So I would love to be able to

489
00:26:55,500 --> 00:27:00,000
test podcast targeting for B2B
and lead a Jen.

490
00:27:00,400 --> 00:27:02,100
And then, gradually takes us on
answers.

491
00:27:02,100 --> 00:27:05,700
Question 5, saying, I'd love to
do some typos.

492
00:27:05,800 --> 00:27:09,500
Some type of video advertising
for my lead gen clients.

493
00:27:09,800 --> 00:27:11,300
I'm not holding my breath,
though.

494
00:27:11,300 --> 00:27:14,800
Again, I'd love to do some type
of video advertising for my lead

495
00:27:14,800 --> 00:27:18,000
gen clients, but I'm not holding
my breath, though.

496
00:27:18,300 --> 00:27:22,400
I'd be happy if they got get.
Onto or back on to other

497
00:27:22,400 --> 00:27:25,100
platforms beside just search at
this point.

498
00:27:25,100 --> 00:27:28,600
So, if you Logan goes one of my
goals for the remainder of 2022

499
00:27:28,800 --> 00:27:31,500
is to run a video campaign for
one of my sass clients.

500
00:27:31,800 --> 00:27:36,000
The issue comes to the
resources, it takes to create a

501
00:27:36,000 --> 00:27:39,400
great asset and they are
unlikely to instantly generate a

502
00:27:39,400 --> 00:27:41,600
lead.
That's not what my clients want

503
00:27:41,600 --> 00:27:44,300
to hear, pulling goes.
I think our plan that includes

504
00:27:44,300 --> 00:27:48,000
videos, sometimes something like
product, demo videos, like

505
00:27:48,000 --> 00:27:50,200
various custom audiences and
then remarked it.

506
00:27:50,300 --> 00:27:53,600
It to those who watch the video.
Glenn response to a question

507
00:27:53,600 --> 00:27:58,400
fighting with coaxing them.
One by one to try short videos

508
00:27:58,800 --> 00:28:01,700
Harrison Jay Happ response to
question five saying not testing

509
00:28:01,700 --> 00:28:05,300
anything major at the moment
because there have been so many

510
00:28:05,300 --> 00:28:09,400
changes in Google, considering
running some P Max test for lead

511
00:28:09,400 --> 00:28:13,600
gen and I've heard a lot of bad
stories there.

512
00:28:13,900 --> 00:28:16,800
Yeah, and England goes, I know
Lee Jen's not the largest

513
00:28:16,800 --> 00:28:21,400
advertising segment props to
Julie for being Standard bearer

514
00:28:21,400 --> 00:28:23,900
of this so it gets some air
time.

515
00:28:23,900 --> 00:28:25,900
So yeah Angela goes, thank you.
It's my jam.

516
00:28:25,900 --> 00:28:28,000
So I love when we get to talk
about it.

517
00:28:28,000 --> 00:28:31,900
Yeah there's loads of different
industries that you know that

518
00:28:32,000 --> 00:28:35,900
outside retail, their loads of
companies are outside the big

519
00:28:35,900 --> 00:28:37,600
retail.
The big, you know, we can do

520
00:28:37,600 --> 00:28:41,300
this, went on shopping, we can
do this on display and pmax that

521
00:28:41,300 --> 00:28:44,200
need attention as well.
They know their customers are on

522
00:28:44,200 --> 00:28:47,700
Google but finding it hard to do
that connect.

523
00:28:47,700 --> 00:28:50,200
So I'm really happy for this
chat.

524
00:28:50,300 --> 00:28:52,700
That as well.
And yes, with looking also

525
00:28:52,700 --> 00:28:55,900
mentions about, you know,
getting some video for some of

526
00:28:55,900 --> 00:28:58,400
her clients just thought I'd end
on that.

527
00:28:58,400 --> 00:29:01,200
So yeah, I'm also thinking we
had a great recording of PPC

528
00:29:01,200 --> 00:29:04,200
live over the first one.
So yeah, I think I'll probably

529
00:29:04,200 --> 00:29:08,000
do some a video ad from that
ring would contact someone on

530
00:29:08,000 --> 00:29:11,100
Fiverr to help me with that
anyway.

531
00:29:11,100 --> 00:29:14,000
So I hope you've taken some
great takeaways about this chat,

532
00:29:14,000 --> 00:29:18,100
but if you want to talk more
about, you know, PPC and PC lead

533
00:29:18,100 --> 00:29:21,300
gen campaigns and your, you have
Very interesting.

534
00:29:21,300 --> 00:29:24,400
Forced to share with us what you
missed the Twitter chat.

535
00:29:24,400 --> 00:29:27,700
Why don't you join us on
Thursday at 5:00 p.m.

536
00:29:27,700 --> 00:29:31,800
BST but British summer time,
which is 12 p.m. eastern time

537
00:29:31,800 --> 00:29:35,200
where we'll be continuing this
chat on Twitter spaces.

538
00:29:35,300 --> 00:29:39,100
Again led by Julie for any
feedback about the podcast or

539
00:29:39,100 --> 00:29:42,000
even, maybe some correction and
anything that has been shared.

540
00:29:42,300 --> 00:29:43,700
Do you get in touch with me on
Twitter?

541
00:29:43,700 --> 00:29:48,100
My DM's are open, on the handle,
at the marketing, a new or on

542
00:29:48,100 --> 00:29:49,400
LinkedIn.
We had.

543
00:29:49,400 --> 00:29:52,700
Do you have a PC Chat Roundup
podcast group there.

544
00:29:52,700 --> 00:29:55,600
So, yeah, you know, I would love
to have you if you want to join

545
00:29:55,600 --> 00:29:58,900
us and share your thoughts about
PPC, Legion forms or anything

546
00:29:58,900 --> 00:30:02,600
else, it also be great for any
of my long-standing members, 20

547
00:30:02,600 --> 00:30:04,800
brand new listings who have been
listening for more than 30

548
00:30:04,800 --> 00:30:09,600
seconds to leave a review or a
rating on Spotify, especially

549
00:30:09,600 --> 00:30:13,000
Wilson Apple, they'll be great
to see which link that you can

550
00:30:13,000 --> 00:30:17,000
get to.
You can go to link tree.com /p P

551
00:30:17,000 --> 00:30:24,500
c-- chat on the score round up,
so that's Tre e.com, /p P c--

552
00:30:24,500 --> 00:30:28,100
chat underscore Roundup.
And yeah, but I also want to

553
00:30:28,100 --> 00:30:32,700
mention that September 29th.
We've got the PPC live second

554
00:30:32,700 --> 00:30:39,000
event in the tallest building in
London, in The Shard on the 22nd

555
00:30:39,000 --> 00:30:40,600
floor.
It's going to be in fantastic

556
00:30:40,600 --> 00:30:45,600
view, but more so amazing talks
from Crystal Carter of wakes

557
00:30:45,600 --> 00:30:49,800
from your good friend of mine,
Chris Ridley of evoluted, who

558
00:30:49,800 --> 00:30:52,900
works in A shuffled.
We got a first time speaker,

559
00:30:52,900 --> 00:30:56,300
Veronica room or and I'm sure
she's going to be killing it on

560
00:30:56,300 --> 00:31:01,500
her topic about what it really
means to be data forward.

561
00:31:01,700 --> 00:31:05,500
Data-driven even data for data
driven.

562
00:31:05,800 --> 00:31:08,400
Anyway, enough of the chatter,
but yeah, please.

563
00:31:08,400 --> 00:31:10,800
Yeah.
Do you consider getting a ticket

564
00:31:10,800 --> 00:31:15,000
for September 29th for the
second PPC, live UK?

565
00:31:15,000 --> 00:31:20,200
Just go to T.L why /p P c-- live
at UK.

566
00:31:20,400 --> 00:31:25,700
SE PT 22.
And finally remember for your

567
00:31:25,700 --> 00:31:28,500
campaigns or businesses to run
smoothly.

568
00:31:28,800 --> 00:31:31,600
There's a lot of hard work hard
work needed beneath the surface.

569
00:31:31,600 --> 00:31:34,800
So keep us one's kicking by and
speak to you next week.